Services on Demand
Article
Indicators
Related links
- Cited by Google
- Similars in Google
Share
South African Dental Journal
On-line version ISSN 0375-1562
Print version ISSN 0011-8516
S. Afr. dent. j. vol.79 n.3 Johannesburg Apr. 2024
http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/sadj.v79i03.16395
RESEARCH
Knowledge and attitudes of oral health care workers on HIV-associated oral lesions: A study at PHC facilities in Gauteng
NM DhlodhloI; NA Mukhari-BaloyiII; TK MadibaIII
IBChD, MPH, Tshwane Oral Health District, Gauteng Department of Health, Pretoria, South Africa ORCID: 0000-0002-8702-4405
IIBDS, Adv Dip (Community Dentistry), MDS (Community Dentistry), MChD (Community Dentistry), Department of Community Dentistry, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa ORCID: 0000-00024374-0186
IIIB.Dent, Ther, BDS, DHSM, MChD (Community Dentistry), Department of Community Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Pretoria, South Africa ORCID: 0000-0002-0171-0595
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Oral health care workers (OHCWs) are critical in providing holistic treatment and preventing the spread of HIV disease. They are uniquely placed to identify, diagnose, manage and treat HIV-related oral lesions.
AIM: To determine oral health clinicians' knowledge and attitudes towards HIV-associated oral lesions.
METHODOLOGY: A descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted at Gauteng's primary health care (PHC) facilities. Data collection targeted the three categories of OHCWs - dentists, dental therapists and oral hygienists.
RESULTS: The response rate was 67.5% (n=110), majority of the participants, 76.4% (n=84), were female. Nearly all participants, 91.8% (n=100), agreed that oral lesions are common in people living with HIV and AIDS (PLWHA) and that early diagnosis of HIV/treatment increases PLHIV's life expectancy. More than three-quarters (80%) reported that they had no problem treating patients diagnosed with HIV Almost a third, 36.4% (n=40), listed necrotising periodontal conditions and oral candidiasis 34.5% (n=38) as the most common oral manifestations. Most respondents correctly identified oral candidiasis (92.7%), Kaposi sarcoma (84.5%) and necrotising ulcerative periodontal conditions (80.9%).
CONCLUSION: Although OHCWs had sound knowledge of oral manifestations of HIV, training programmes must be prioritised for knowledge transfer. Dental facilities can be used as a health-promoting platform and a viable location for provider-initiated testing and counselling (PICT) and client-initiated counselling and testing (CICT), also known as voluntary counselling and testing (VCT). The use of HIV rapid testing kits is an option to be explored in the dental facility by OHCWs.
Keywords: Oral health clinicians (OHC), oral manifestations, HIV, AIDS, knowledge and attitudes
BACKGROUND
The mouth is perceived as the mirror of a patient's overall health; it may manifest with symptoms that alert a clinician to an underlying systemic condition such as diabetes, sexually transmitted infections, anaemia and Sjogren's syndrome.1 Literature has shown that Human Immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection causes oral lesions.2 An estimated 67% of the 38.4 million people living with HIV (PLWH) globally in 2021 were from Sub-Saharan Africa. Sub-Saharan Africa was responsible for 670,000 of the 1.5 million new infections and 280,000 of the 650,000 AIDS-related deaths reported globallyin 2021.3 With an estimated 7.8 million people living with HIV in 2023, South Africa has the world's largest and most visible HIV epidemic.4 There were 160,000 new HIV infections in South Africa in 2022, and 45,000 people died from AIDS-related illnesses.5 The prevalence of HIV in South Africa remains high with the infection stratified according to gender. The most pronounced differences in HIV prevalence by gender were seen among younger populations which calls for focused interventions. Compared to males of the same age groups, HIV prevalence was approximately two-fold in females aged 15-19 years (5.6% vs 3% respectively) and 20-24 years (8% vs 4% respectively) and three-fold higher in females aged 25-29 (20% vs 6% respectively).4
Despite the abundance of literature on HIV oral manifestations, literature is scant on oral health care workers' (OHCWs) knowledge and the efficacy of their management of oral HIV lesions in a country like South Africa. Oral health care workers ought to have knowledge of the HIV disease process, its oral manifestations and modes of transmission as they are strongly associated with patient readiness to receive treatment and management thereof.1
There is a link between oral health and systemic infections, and that has prompted a call for all healthcare providers to increase their knowledge of oral health; thus the World Health Organization (WHO) oral health programme has emphasised the importance of oral examinations for all patients to reduce common health problems, such as HIV disease.2,6 Between 70% and 90% of HIV-infected people will have at least one oral manifestation during the infection, and OHCWs regularly encounter patients with oral lesions associated with HIV and require adequate knowledge of these conditions for diagnosis and management.1,7
Oral lesions associated with HIV presenting in undiagnosed individuals may indicate early clinical signs of HIV infection; they also predict disease progression and may be indicative of HAART non-compliance and are clinical markers for HIV staging and classification.2,7
In 1994, the European Economic Community-Clearinghouse (EEC-Clearinghouse) on oral problems related to HIV infection and the WHO Collaborating Centre on oral manifestations of the human immunodeficiency virus classified these lesions into three distinct groups and in 1993 revised their classification, which is currently in use.8-10
Group 1 Lesions that are strongly associated with HIV infection:
• Oral candidiasis (erythematous, pseudomembranous and angular cheilitis)
• Oral hairy leucoplakia
• Periodontal diseases (linear gingival erythema, necrotising gingivitis and periodontitis)
• Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
• Kaposi sarcoma
Group 2 Lesions less commonly associated with HIV infection:
• Melanotic hyperpigmentation
• Ulcer not otherwise specific
• Herpes simplex virus infection
• Herpes zoster
• Decreased salivary flow rate
Group 3 Lesions seen in HIV infection:
• Recurrent aphthous ulcers
• Molluscum contagiosum
• Lechenoid reactions
• Facial palsy
• Erythema multiform
Care providers' negative attitudes and biases toward people living with HIV are reported across the world with care providers also admitting reluctance among some to provide adequate care to people who are HIV positive.11 Oral health care workers' attitudes towards patients living with HIV are formed primarily through a learning process which can take several forms, including classical conditioning, operant conditioning, observational learning and imitation.12 It is therefore important that the knowledge and attitudes of OHCWs towards HIV be assessed in clinical settings in South Africa. The study, therefore, sought to determine the knowledge and attitudes of oral health clinicians on HIV-associated oral lesions in primary health care (PHC) facilities in Gauteng. To the authors' knowledge, this study has never been undertaken in PHC facilities in Gauteng.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study design and population
Ethical approval was obtained from the University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg human research ethics committee (Ref M210831A). No personal details of the participants were disclosed, and all information was strictly confidential and anonymous. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at primary health care facilities across Gauteng province in 2022. The survey population included dentists, dental therapists and oral hygienists referred to as oral health care workers. The Gauteng province is divided into five districts namely Tshwane, Ekurhuleni, West Rand, Joburg Metro and Sedibeng and the populations of the study were invited from all the five districts.
The recently updated estimates of OHCWs in Gauteng indicated a total of two hundred and eighty (280). The Raosoft software was used for computing the sample size (Raosoft,2004).13 With the margin of error of 5% and the confidence level at 95% a representative sample was calculated to be 163 participants. The ages of the participants were grouped into three, being 21-30, 41-40 and >40 age groups.
Data collection
A pretested, self-administered questionnaire was used to collect information on the sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge and attitude of oral health care workers regarding HIV-associated oral lesions.11 Participants were, for example, asked to list five common oral lesions associated with HIV, given pictures of HIV-associated lesions for identification and asked if they could get infected with HIV from a needle stick injury, to test their knowledge. To test their attitudes, questions were asked such as can they safely treat patients with HIV, whether they fear or are concerned with treating patients with HIV because of fear of infection, and if they think patients infected with HIV should have their files specifically marked so that they as health workers should be aware to take specific protective measures.
The analytical tool used was SPSS Version 28 software. Quantitative variables were summarised as proportions, frequencies and mean with standard deviations, ranges and percentages. A Chi-squared test was utilised to test the association between variables. The level of significance was set at p<0.05.
RESULTS
Demographic profile of participants
Out of the estimated representative sample of 163, there was a 67.5% (n=110) response rate. The majority of participants (76.4%) were female. The majority age range of the participants was the >40 age group. Nearly two-thirds (65.5%) were dentists. Just over half (53.6%) had work experience of fewer than 10 years. More than a third (35.5%) worked in the Tshwane metropolitan area, and nearly half (44.5%) were practising in clinics. Nearly all (95.5%) of the participants worked full time. Other demographic features are listed in Table 1.
Knowledge
The majority of respondents (91.8%) agreed that oral lesions are common in people living with HIV and AIDS (PLWHA) and that early diagnosis/treatment increases PLWHA's life expectancy. More than a third (36.4%) listed necrotising periodontal conditions and oral candidiasis (34.5%) as the most common oral manifestations observed. Most respondents correctly identified oral candidiasis (92.7%), Kaposi sarcoma (84.5%), necrotising ulcerative periodontal conditions (80.9) and nearly a third (27.3%) correctly identified Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The most common lesions seen in the participants' area of work can be seen in Table 2.
Dentists generally managed to correctly identify all the lesions except for Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, as only 29% correctly identified it. Ninety-five percent (95%) of dental therapists managed to identify oral candidiasis lesions correctly. Oral hygienists (94%) also correctly identified oral candidiasis. See Table 3.
Nearly two-thirds (63%) perceived the risk of contracting HIV in the dental clinic to be high. Nearly all participants (97.3%) think needlestick injury can transmit HIV. Most of the participants (80%) think the dental staff are more prone to cross-contamination.
Attitudes
More than three-quarters (80%) reported that they had no problem treating patients diagnosed with HIV, 8% were uncomfortable treating the patients and 12% reported not being sure. The majority (80.9%) felt that all patients with HIV-associated oral lesions must be referred to the relevant department and handled by dental staff.
More than two-thirds of respondents (70.9%) thought introducing HIV testing in the dental facility was feasible and would improve the patient's prognosis. Close to half of the participants thought rapid HIV testing and HIV counselling needed to be routine in the dental facility, 41.8% and 47% respectively. See Table 5.
Associations concerning knowledge
The association between correctly identifying the lesion and the category of the clinician can be seen in Table 6.
Significantly more dentists were able to correctly identify Kaposi sarcoma, followed by oral hygienists, p=0.001. As far as linear gingival erythema was concerned significantly more dentists, followed by oral hygienists, were able to correctly identify it as compared to dental therapists, p=0002. For both lesions dental therapists performed the least. As far as necrotising gingivitis, Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, oral candidiasis, necrotising ulcerative periodontitis and hairy leukoplakia there was no difference in correctly identifying the lesions whether one was a dentist, oral hygienist or dental therapist, p>0.005.
There was no association between knowledge and area of practice, knowledge of the testing for HIV, age category and length of experience, p>0.005.
Associations concerning attitude
Association between attitude and the level of experience of the clinician in connection with the need to avoid treating an HIV positive patient and sending them elsewhere can be seen in Table 7.
Statistically more than half the clinicians with more than 10 years of experience had a positive attitude of treating the patients who are HIV positive and not sending them away to someone else to avoid treating them, p=0.005. Twenty-nine percent (29%) of the respondents with 0-5 years of experience would like to send HIV-positive people to be treated by someone else in order to avoid treating them.
Association between attitude and category of staff who wanted files to depict HIV status
There was no association between attitude and category of staff who wanted patients' files marked with HIV status, p=0.521. This is despite the fact that the majority of staff who thought this was not a good idea participated (61%). See Table 8.
DISCUSSION
Oral health care workers play an essential role in the management of HIV/AIDS. Oral manifestations are frequently the first signs of HIV infection and play a crucial role in predicting disease progression. Oral health care workers ought to enhance their knowledge about the disease, its oral manifestations and management to provide effective clinical management. Appropriate knowledge may also instil confidence in the ability of the oral health clinician to manage oral manifestations of HIV/AIDS.
About half (53.6%) of the participants in the study had work experience of >10 years in public service. This may be because most qualified oral health practitioners stay in public service for various reasons, including job security and comfort.14 Yet the gaps identified warrant the need for an urgent invention in the continued professional development of oral manifestations associated with HIV/AIDS.
KNOWLEDGE
Overall, respondents in this study illustrated sound knowledge of oral manifestations of HIV/AIDS. However, there were some significant yet disturbing gaps in knowledge as 40.9% of the respondents did not know that western blot is a definite test for HIV/AIDS diagnosis and 23.6% of the participants agreed that HIV could be transmitted by aerosols through handpieces. Aerosol transmission is considered the least likely cause of infection as it does not lead to any HIV seroconversion.15 Similarly, a study conducted among medical professionals in India revealed that there was a significant level of incomplete knowledge of HIV/AIDS infection.15
However, the study revealed that participants had significant knowledge about the transmission of HIV and the modes of transmission as 75.5% of the participants did not agree that saliva can be a vehicle for the transmission of HIV/AIDS.16 Saliva has a relatively low viral load; thus, OHCWs have a lower risk of being infected with HIV through saliva.17 Some study participants (58%) believed that OHCWs can act as intermediaries for the transmission of HIV. This general misconception is consistent with other studies.18-20
The most commonly observed oral lesion was necrotising ulcerative gingivitis (seen by 36.4% of respondents), followed by oral candidiasis at 34.5%. Contrary to other studies, oral candidiasis was the most commonly observed oral lesion in HIV-infected patients.20-21 Oral candidiasis is the most common lesion linked to HIV disease progression. Candidiasis presents on the oral mucosa during the early stages of HIV and may indicate early HIV infection. It may also be a warning sign of immunological and virologic failure in patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART).22
To further test the participants' knowledge, they were asked to identify seven unlabelled photographic images depicting lesions strongly associated with HIV. More than three-quarters of the participants correctly identified the two lesions strongly associated with HIV, Kaposi sarcoma (84.5%) and oral hairy leucoplakia (78.2%). Nearly all participants in the present study correctly identified oral candidiasis as the most common oral HIV lesion, similar to other studies.21-22 Regardless, this shows that OHCWs need more training in recognising such lesions to avoid delayed diagnosis, which can result in poor health and quality of life due to discomfort, dysfunction and impairment.14, 25
Attitudes
While numerous studies have been conducted on the knowledge, attitudes and practices of dentists concerning HIV/AIDS, few have focused on other OHCWs such as dental therapists, oral hygienists and dental assistants.
The present study found that an overwhelming majority did not mind treating PLWHA. This might be related to the high prevalence of HIV in South Africa and the frequency of dental care provision to PLWHA. These are commendable findings and suggest the level of trust between the patients and the OHCWs and their knowledge of the disease process.26 A Canadian study by McCarthy et al. (1999) indicated adequate knowledge of HIV/AIDS and awareness of the ethical responsibility to treat (all) patients as factors associated with willingness to treat patients.27 The high response on willingness to treat concurred with other studies;19,28-32 but is contrary to a much earlier South African study in which only 45% reported willingness to deliver dental care to HIV-positive patients.22 In 2006, a study also reported that although there was a growing acceptance to the management of PLWHA, dentists still experienced a moderate to extremely high fear and anxiety of transmitting HIV to oneself or other patients.33 This difference in the findings may be explained by the current wealth of knowledge on HIV and its transmission routes, which was very low in the early 1990s. The high willingness reported in the present study may indicate that OHCWs are aware of their ethical obligation to provide treatment to all patients.
CONCLUSION
Overall, participants in this study illustrated sound knowledge of oral manifestations of HIV/AIDS. However, there were some significant gaps in knowledge. The study also revealed that participants had sufficient knowledge about the transmission of HIV and the modes of transmission.
While most OHCWs showed a willingness to treat HIV/ AIDS patients and displayed good attitudes in managing oral lesions associated with HIV, specific considerations such as the patient's referral for further management may be made due to the patient's compromised immune state. However, training programmes should continue to prioritise knowledge transfer on basic HIV/AIDS concepts, particularly transmission. Based on the increase in the prevalence and incidence of HIV cases, oral healthcare workers are likely to be exposed to oral manifestations. Improving OHCW skills in diagnosing and managing HIV/AIDS oral manifestations cannot be overstated. There is a need to increase awareness of clinical signs and symptoms of underlying infection and the ability to detect them and refer patients for additional testing.
In a nutshell, better-structured education targeted at all healthcare professionals working in both rural and urban hospital settings, apart from classroom teaching, in the form of health talks/seminars, in-service training, continuing medical education, quizzes and debates would improve the HIV/AIDS knowledge of health care providers most efficiently and effectively but also contribute towards ending the HIV/AIDS epidemic.16
LIMITATIONS
While KAP methodology surveys help research general public health information on knowledge and treatment practices, it has been criticised for several reasons, including its ability to measure attitudes and practices. Often participants gave responses that they believed were acceptable to the researcher resulting in acquiescence bias. Therefore, the answers may not have been a true reflection of the actions of OHCWs. The KAP methodology has also been criticised for the rigid nature of the questionnaire design with very few open-ended questions. In some instances, participants had few choices with the close-ended questions and were limited in their responses. The colour photographs used to depict oral lesions were not accompanied by patients' medical histories and may have limited diagnostic abilities. Also, cross-sectional studies' limitation includes their inability to assess the incidence and make causal inferences.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The study provides additional insight into the knowledge and attitudes of this critical group of health care workers. Particular emphasis should be placed on developing skills for OHCWs in the areas of communicating with and counselling HIV/AIDS patients. Integrating these topics into undergraduate curricula, induction workshops and continuous professional programmes would be advantageous.34
HIV risk assessments of OHCWs frequently focus solely on the occupational risk of transmission, ignoring other potential contributory factors such as gender. The dental surgery should be used as a health-promoting platform and a viable location to investigate preventive strategies such as voluntary counselling and testing (VCT) as well as provider-initiated testing and counselling (PICT).16 The use of HIV rapid testing kits is an option to be explored in the dental facility by OHCWs.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Support from Wits HREC, FREPT programme leader Dr Ikalafeng, Gauteng multi district research team led by Prof S Moosa, Gauteng oral health supervisors Dr Sanele Poswa (Gauteng province) and Dr Suzana Reinprecht (Tshwane district) is acknowledged.
REFERENCES
1. Ramphoma KJ, Naidoo S. 2014. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of oral health care workers in Lesotho regarding the management of patients with oral manifestations of HIV/AIDS. South African Dental Journal, 69(10):446-53 [ Links ]
2. Okolo A. Knowledge, attitude & practice of non-dental health care providers in relation to the oral manifestations of HIV/AIDS in Butha-buthe district, Lesotho. 2016 [ Links ]
3. Moyo E, Moyo P, Murewanhema G, Mhango M, Chitungo I, Dzinamarira T. Key populations and Sub-Saharan Africa's HIV response. Front Public Health. 2023;11. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1079990 [ Links ]
4. The Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC). New HIV Survey Highlights Progress and Ongoing Disparities in South Africa's HIV epidemic: Sixth South African National HIV Prevalence, Incidence and Behaviour Survey. 2023. Available on https://hsrc.ac.za/press-releases/hsc/new-hiv-survey-highlights-progress-and-ongoing-disparities-in-south-africas-hiv-epidemic. Accessed 12 March 2024 [ Links ]
5. UNAIDS Data book. 2023. Available on https://www.unaids.org>files>data-book-2023_en.Pdf. Accessed 12 March 2024 [ Links ]
6. Petersen LA, Woodard LD, Urech T, Daw C, Sookanan S. 2006. Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care? Annals of Internal Medicine, 145(4):265-72 [ Links ]
7. Lee C, Fan Y, Starr JR, Dogon IL. 2017. Dentists' and dental students' attitudes, knowledge, preparedness, and willingness related to the treatment of people living with HIV/AIDS in China. Journal of Public Health Dentistry, 77(1):30-8 [ Links ]
8. Berberi A, Aoun G. 2017. Oral lesions associated with Human Immunodeficiency Virus in 75 adult patients: A clinical study. Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 43(6):388 [ Links ]
9. Kuteyi T, Okwundu CI. Topical treatments for HIV-related oral ulcers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012; (1) [ Links ]
10. Coogan MM, Greenspan J, Challacombe SJ. Oral lesions in infection with human immunodeficiency virus. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2005; 83:700-6 [ Links ]
11. Galane, Mpatikana Leslie. Knowledge, attitude and practices regarding HIV/AIDS among dental students at Medunsa Oral Health centre. URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10386/1093 [ Links ]
12. Boakye DS, Mavhandu-Mudzusi AH. Nurses' knowledge, attitudes and practices towards patients with HIV and AIDS in Kumasi, Ghana. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences. 2019; 11:100147 [ Links ]
13. Calculator, Raosoft (2004) Sample size. Raosoft. http://www.rasoft.com/samplesize.html [ Links ]
14. Clark-Alexander B. Dental hygienists' beliefs, norms, attitudes, and intentions toward treating HIV/AIDS patients. 2008 [ Links ]
15. Corstjens PL, Abrams WR, Malamud D. Saliva and viral infections. Periodontology 2000. 2016; 70(1):93-110 [ Links ]
16. Doda A, Negi G, Gaur DS, Harsh M. Human immunodeficiency virus/Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome: a survey on the knowledge, attitude, and practice among medical professionals at a tertiary health-care institution in Uttarakhand, India. Asian Journal of Transfusion Science. 2018 Jan;12(1):21 [ Links ]
17. Heir J, Ziccardi VB. Transmission of infectious disease in the dental setting. The Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, New York. 1998; 65(5-6):378-82 [ Links ]
18. Maupomé G, Borges-Yáñez SA, Díez-de-Bonilla FJ, Irigoyen-Camacho ME. Attitudes toward HIV-infected individuals and infection control practices among a group of dentists in Mexico City - a 1999 update of the 1992 survey. American Journal of Infection Control. 2002; 30(1):8-14 [ Links ]
19. Gachigo J, Naidoo S. HIV/AIDS: The knowledge, attitudes and behaviour of dentists in Nairobi, Kenya. SADJ: Journal of the South African Dental Association. 2001; 56(12):587-91 [ Links ]
20. Kaste LM, Bednarsh H. The third decade of HIV/AIDS: A brief epidemiologic update for dentistry. Journal of the Canadian Dental Association. 2007; 73(10) [ Links ]
21. Darling M, Arendorf T, Samaranayake LP. Oral care of HIV-infected patients: The knowledge and attitudes of South African dentists. SADJ, The Journal of the Dental Association of South Africa 1992; 47(9):399-402 [ Links ]
22. Rudolph M, Ogunbodede E. HIV infection and oral health care in South Africa. SADJ: Journal of the South African Dental Association. 1999; 54(12):594-601 [ Links ]
23. Ledergerber B, Egger M, Opravil M, Telenti A, Hirschel B, Battegay M, et al. Clinical progression and virological failure on highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 patients: A prospective cohort study. The Lancet. 1999; 353(9156):863-8 [ Links ]
24. Mirchandani K. Knowledge, attitudes and behaviour of PHC nurses with regard to oral HIV in Bisho district in Eastern Cape. 2016 [ Links ]
25. Agbelusi G, Adeola H, Ameh P. Knowledge and attitude of plwha concerning oral lesions of HIV/AIDS among patients of Pepfar clinic in Lagos University Teaching Hospital (LUTH), Lagos, Nigeria. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2011; 18(2):120-5 [ Links ]
26. Yengopal V, Naidoo S. Do oral lesions associated with HIV affect quality of life? Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2008; 106(1):66-73 [ Links ]
27. Siegel K, Abel SN, Pereyra M, Liguori T, Pollack HA, Metsch LR. Rapid HIV testing in dental practices. American Journal of Public Health. 2012; 102(4):625-32 [ Links ]
28. Scully C, McCarthy G. Management of oral health in persons with HIV infection. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology. 1992; 73(2):215-25 [ Links ]
29. Coleman DC, Bennett DE, Sullivan DJ, Gallagher PJ, Henman MC, Shanley DB, et al. Oral candida in HIV infection and aids: New perspectives/new approaches. Critical reviews in microbiology. 1993; 19(2):61-82 [ Links ]
30. Godin G, Naccache H, Brodeur JM, Alary M. Understanding the intention of dentists to provide dental care to HIV+ and Aids patients. Community dentistry and oral epidemiology. 1999; 27(3):221-7 [ Links ]
31. Bodhade A, Dive A, Khandekar S, Dhoble A, Moharil R, Gayakwad R, et al. Factors associated with refusal to treat HIV-infected patients: National survey of dentists in India. Sci J Public Health. 2013; 1(2):51-5 [ Links ]
32. Rabiee M, Kazennezhad E. Knowledge and attitude of general dentists regarding HIV and Hepatitis Infections in Rasht. Res Med Educ. 2012;4(1):58-67 [ Links ]
33. Askarian M, Mirzaei K, McLaws M-L. Attitudes, beliefs, and infection control practices of Iranian dentists associated with HIV-positive patients. Am J Infect Control. 2006;34(8):530-3 [ Links ]
34. Taher E, Abdelhai R. Nurses' knowledge, perceptions and attitudes towards HIV/ AIDS: Effects of a health education intervention on two nursing groups in Cairo University, Egypt. Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology. 2011 Apr;3(4):144-54 [ Links ]
Correspondence:
Name: Prof TK Madiba
Email: thommy.madiba@gmail.com/thommy.madiba@up.ac.za
Author's contribution
1. Dr Ndlelanhle M Dhlodhlo - principal author (40%)
2. Dr Ntsakisi A Mukhari-Baloyi - second author (30%)
3. Prof Thomas K Madiba - third author (30%)