SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.114 issue11 author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

SAMJ: South African Medical Journal

On-line version ISSN 2078-5135
Print version ISSN 0256-9574

SAMJ, S. Afr. med. j. vol.114 n.11 Pretoria Nov. 2024

http://dx.doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2024.v114i11.2065 

RESEARCH

 

Evaluation of clinical, laboratory, radiographical and histopathological characteristics in patients with spinal tuberculosis in the context of HIV infection: An analysis of 52 patients from a South African tertiary hospital

 

 

J SchererI, II; S CasteleinI; M LocketzIII; R DunnIV; M HeldV; F ThienemannVI, VII

IMD; Orthopaedic Research Unit, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa
IIMD; University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
IIIMMed (Path); Department of Histopathology, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, South Africa
IVMMed (Ortho); Orthopaedic Research Unit, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa
VPhD; Orthopaedic Research Unit, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa
VIPhD; University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
VIIPhD; General Medicine and Global Health Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa

Correspondence

 

 


ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND. South Africa (SA) has the highest prevalence of people with tuberculosis (TB) and HIV coinfection globally. People living with HIV have an increased risk of TB infection, and are more likely to develop extrapulmonary TB. Approximately 10 - 20% of extrapulmonary TB accounts for skeletal TB, with spinal involvement in 50 - 60% of instances. Previous studies have shown highly heterogenic results regarding the effect of HIV status on clinical and laboratory characteristics in patients with spinal TB (STB).
OBJECTIVE. To describe the clinical, laboratory, radiographical and histopathological characteristics of patients diagnosed with STB stratified by HIV status.
METHODS. Data from patients who were treated for STB at the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Groote Schuur Hospital, SA, between 2013 and 2016 were analysed. We compared clinical, laboratory, radiographical and histopathological parameters of STB patients with HIV infection to those without HIV infection. To assess differences in means between the two groups, an independent samples t-test was used for normally distributed continuous data, and a
χ2 test for categorical data. To assess correlations between continuous data groups, the Pearson correlation coefficient was used.
RESULTS. We assessed 52 patients with STB (mean (standard deviation (SD) age 38 (15.2) years, range 17 - 80 years), of whom 55.8% were female, and 59.6% HIV infected. Five (9.6%) patients were identified with multidrug-resistant TB of the spine, with four (19.0%) in the HIV-infected cohort and one in the HIV-uninfected cohort (p=0.058). Significantly more STB patients without HIV infection presented with neurogenic symptoms (29%, p=0.029). The mean (SD) overall erythrocyte sedimentation rate was 69.3 (35.9) mm/h, with no significant difference between HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected patients (p=0.086). The rate of vertebral collapse was higher in the HIV-infected cohort (39% v. 67%, p=0.048). HIV-infected patients showed a higher count of involved vertebrae (mean 3.0 v. 3.85; p=0.034). There was no correlation between CD4 count and the number of involved vertebrae. The mean (SD) number of granulomata per low-power field was 10 (12.6), with no difference between the two cohorts. However, we found a positive correlation between granuloma count and CD4 cell count in HIV-infected STB patients (Pearson 0.503, p=0.02), with significantly higher formation of granulomata at a CD4 cell count >400 cells/
μL (p=0.045).
CONCLUSION. In our cohort, HIV-infected patients with STB were more likely to present with vertebral collapse, and more vertebrae on average were diseased compared with HIV-uninfected patients with STB. CD4 cell count may affect granuloma formation, and it seems that HIV infection has a negative effect on cellular immunoresponse in STB, which emphasises the need for early antiretroviral therapy initiation.

Keywords: spinal tuberculosis, tuberculous spondylodiscitis, Pott's disease, cohort study, South Africa


 

 

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a serious global health concern. In 2022, an estimated 10.6 million people fell ill with TB, of whom 1.3 million died, including 167 000 individuals living with HIV.[1] Globally, the highest numbers of TB cases have been reported from South-East Asia (44%), followed by Africa (24%) and the Western Pacific (18%.)[2] TB is considered the 'illness of the poor', and is transmitted through droplets containing Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb).[3,4] TB is the leading cause of death due to an infectious disease worldwide, and the leading cause of death in people living with HIV. [5,6] There were ~39 million people living with HIV globally in 2022, of whom 20.8 million lived in sub-Saharan Africa.[7] South Africa (SA) is the most affected country, with >10% of the population infected with HIV.[7] HIV causes immunosuppression with depletion and dysfunction of CD4 cells, macrophages and monocytes, which increases the risk of primary and reactivated TB.[8,9] Patients with TB/HIV co-infection are more likely to develop extrapulmonary TB (EPTB).[10-14] Extrapulmonary disease may occur during any stage of HIV infection, but risk increases with advanced stage of immunosuppression.[10,11,15,16] Overall, EPTB occurs in 15 - 20% of immunocompetent TB patients, and in >50% of patients with TB/HIV co-infection.[17] Approximately 10 - 20% of EPTB manifests as skeletal TB, with spinal involvement in more than half of these patients. [18-22] Spinal TB (STB), also called Pott's disease, usually results in local back pain, neurological deficit, spinal instability and constitutional symptoms. Duration from initial symptoms to diagnosis can take several years.[4,19,23-25] The influence of HIV infection on tissue samples and laboratory markers from patients with STB has been well studied; however, the results of these previous studies are highly heterogeneous.[26] Further, studies examining the effect of concomitant HIV infection on radiographical parameters such as degree of vertebral collapse and spinal distribution of diseased vertebrae are inconsistent.[27,28] Therefore, the aim of this study was to describe the clinical, radiographical and histopathological characteristics of patients diagnosed with STB stratified by HIV status to better understand the influence of HIV infection on STB.

 

Methods

Study design and cohort

This was a retrospective cohort study. All patients >16 years old and being treated for STB at the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, SA, from January 2013 to December 2016 were included in this analysis. The laboratory reports, including HIV-1/2 Ab/Ag ELISA, microbiology and histology were accessed through the National Health Laboratory System. Patients' demographic data as well as clinical assessments were retrospectively accessed through the patients' clinical files. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was assessed for number of involved vertebrae, vertebral collapse, abscess formation and abscess location. Histopathological specimens were assessed for granuloma type, granuloma formation count and degree of inflammation. Degree of inflammation was defined as 0 (0 inflammatory cells per low-power field), 1 (1 inflammatory cell per low-power field) or 2 (>2 inflammatory cells per low-power field).

Patients treated at this academic hospital are mostly from low-income households, and often live in densely populated areas or informal settlements with high TB and HIV incidence.

Definition of spinal tuberculosis

STB was defined as a positive TB spinal tissue culture (mycobacteria growth indicator tube (MGIT)) or positive GeneXpert for Mtb (GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay, USA), or acid-fast bacilli on microscopy with apparent Langerhans cells or granulomatous infection. Patients with no tissue diagnosis, no alternative diagnosis, MRI findings suggestive of STB (Fig. 1) and clinical improvement on TB treatment were considered as cases of STB.[29]

Data are presented as frequencies (%) and means (standard deviations (SD)). To assess differences in means between the two groups, an independent samples f-test was used for normally distributed continuous data, and a χ2 test for categorical data. To assess differences in means between the two groups, the Mann-Whitney U-test was used for not normally distributed continuous data (Shapiro-Wilk <0.05). To assess correlations between continuous data groups, the Pearson correlation coefficient was used. The level of statistical significance was set at p<0.05. All statistical analyses were performed in SPSS Statistics version 29.0 for Mac OS (SPSS, USA).

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town (ref. no. HREC 597/2015). The study adhered to the ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects outlined in the Helsinki Declaration of 1975 (revised 2013).[30]

A study protocol was prepared for ethical approval. No registration of the protocol was done.

 

Results

Study cohort

In total, 57 patients were recruited into the STB cohort (Table 1). Five were excluded from the final analysis due to unknown HIV status or missing CD4 cell count values. The HIV-uninfected cohort, designated 'STBHIV-; comprised 59.6% (n=31) of patients; 40.4% (n=21) of the patients were included in the HIV-infected cohort, designated as 'STBHIV+'.

Demographics and comorbidities

Table 1 summarises the demographic characteristics and comorbidities of the STB cohort, stratified by HIV status. Overall, 44.2% (n=23) of the patients were male. The mean (SD) age of the cohort was 38 (15.2) years (range 17 - 80), with no significant difference between StbHIV- and STBHIV+. Overall, 9.6% of patients were identified with multidrug-resistant (MDR)-STB, 19.0% STBHIV+ and 3.2% STBHIV-. A total of 76.2% of STBHIV+ patients were receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) at time of presentation. Thirteen patients received TB treatment before undergoing spinal surgery, whereas 33 patients received TB treatment afterwards. In six cases, the timing of TB treatment start was undocumented.

Neurological deficit and neurogenic symptoms[31,32]

A total of 65% of patients presented with at least one neurological symptom. This included either sensory loss, radicular pain, limb weakness or inability to walk (Table 2). No significant differences were detected between the two cohorts except for neurogenic symptoms, which were more common in the STBHIV- cohort. Six (66.7%) of the nine patients with neurogenic symptoms suffered from either urinary or stool incontinence, or both.

Laboratory results

Table 3 summarises the key laboratory results. The mean (SD) overall erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was 69.3 (35.9) mm/hr, with no significant difference between STBHIV- and STBHIV+. No statistical difference between the groups was found regarding white cell count. CD4 cell count in STBHIV+ ranged from 10 to 900 CD4 cells/μL.

Table 4 summarises spinal tissue microbiology. Microbiological results were available in 43 of 52 patients (82.7%). A total of 35/43 patients (81.4%) with tissue microbiology had a positive MGIT culture result for Mtb, whereas 40/43 (93.0%) had a positive Xpert result. No difference was found between the STBHIV- and STBHIV+.

Radiology

Table 5 summarises the MRI findings. The mean (SD) count of involved vertebrae was 3.40 (2.35), without significant differences between STBHIV- and STBHIV+. Half of the patients suffered from vertebral collapse. The rate of collapse was significantly higher in STBHIV+ (39% v. 67%, p=0.048). Spinal abscess formation was similar in both groups. There was no correlation between CD4 cell count and the number of involved vertebrae.

Histopathology

Table 6 summarises the histopathological findings. The predominant granuloma type was caseous (48.1%), followed by solid cellular (44.2%), suppurative and solid fibrous (each 1.9%). There was no statistical difference in granuloma formation between STBHIV- and STBHIV+. The mean (SD) number of granulomata per low-power field at (x40 magnification) was 10.2 (12.6), with no difference between the two cohorts. Of the spinal tissue samples, 73.1% showed high-grade inflammation (inflammatory cells easily visible at x40 magnification), 7.7% showed moderate inflammation (inflammatory cells easily visible at x100 magnification) and 19.2% had a low-grade inflammation (inflammatory cells not visible at x100 magnification). There was no significant difference between STBHIV- and STBHIV+. In the STBHIV+ cohort, a significantly higher formation of granulomata at a CD4 cell count value of 400 CD4 cells was found (stepwise Student's t-test p=0.045; Shapiro-Wilk >0.05). We also found a positive correlation between granuloma count and CD4 cell count (Pearson 0.503, p=0.02) (Fig. 2), but no correlation was found between granuloma count and ART administration. Furthermore, there was no correlation between the amount of inflammation and ART administration or CD4 cell count, respectively.

 

Discussion

The aim of the present study was to identify the epidemiology, clinical findings, radiographical findings and laboratory parameters among patients with confirmed STB, stratified by their HIV status in a country with a high disease burden, to gain further insight into the influence of HIV status on STB disease burden. To our knowledge, this is the second largest sample size of TB spine cases with regard to HIV status reported yet.[20,33] Almost half of our study population was HIV infected, reflecting a higher incidence of STB in people living with HIV than reported in the literature.[34,35] Almost 10% of the observed patients had MDR-TB, which is consistent with a reported prevalence of 5.8 - 11.8% in SA.[29,36] A total of 34 patients presented with neurological symptoms of varying severity, including limb weakness, sensory loss and radiating pain to the lower limb. A previous study has shown that HIV-uninfected patients with STB have higher rates of collapsed vertebrae than HIV-infected patients, which could explain the significantly higher incidence of neurogenic symptoms in the present STBHIV- group.[27] The mean ESR in our study was 69.3 mm/hr among all patients. There was a trend towards higher ESR (p=0.086) and lower white cell counts (p=0.113) in STBHIV+, which is consistent with findings from previous studies.[27,37] Previous studies investigating the correlation between HIV and spinal infections have found very low CD4 counts in STB. A case series conducted in the USA investigating six HIV-infected patients with STB reported a mean CD4 cell count of 57.2 cells/μL, whereas another study from SA reported mean counts of 424 CD4 cells/μL.[38,39] We report a mean CD4 cell count of 362/ μL among the 21 HIV-infected patients, of whom 16 received ART. Another study reported a mean CD4 cell count of 496 cells/μL in HIV-infected patients with STB, where none of the assessed patients were receiving ART.[40] We did not assess the CD4 cell counts of the HIV-uninfected cohort, but believe that there is a significant difference between the two groups, as reported in a previous study from the Eastern Cape Province in SA.[35]

Data on the vertebral involvement in STB are inconsistent. A larger study including 597 STB patients reported on average 2.7 involved vertebrae.[41] Another smaller study reported a mean number of 3.2.[42] We report a mean count of 3.40 involved vertebrae among all assessed patients, with significantly more involved vertebrae in the STBHIV+ group, which is inconsistent with two previous studies showing no difference between immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients regarding the number of vertebrae involved.[28,43] We detected significantly more collapsed vertebrae in StbHIV+, which is consistent with findings from investigations by Marais et al.[28] (274 patients), but contrary to findings from Anley et al.[27] (50 patients).[27,28] HIV has a negative impact on granuloma formation in TB, and therefore compromises the patient's immunity towards Mtb.[44] Our histological analysis revealed predominantly caseous and solid cellular granulomata, with no difference between StbHIV- and STBHIV+. Danaviah et al.[35] reported similar findings of granuloma organisation, and described a shift towards CD8 cells in HIV-infected patients, with STB as a compensation mechanism for the depletion of CD4 cells.[30] We observed a trend towards a decreased grade of inflammation and fewer granulomata in STBHIV+, which seems logical, since inflammation and formation of granulomata is T-cell dependent, and cellular immunoreaction is impaired in patients living with HIV.[45] Our results showed a significant positive correlation between CD4 cell count and the observed number of granulomata at a cut-off of 400 CD4 cells. Several studies have focused on the question of whether CD4 cell counts are affecting TB granuloma formation.[5] To our knowledge, only one study focused on the histopathological features of HIV-infected STB patients, but did not examine the correlation between CD4 cell count and the number of granulomata.[30] An Italian study focusing on pulmonary TB found a reduction of granuloma count associated with HIV infection, which is consistent with our findings.[46] A study conducted in Zimbabwe investigating pleural TB did not find any significant difference of granuloma formation or count between HIV-infected and uninfected patients.[47] A systematic review conducted in 2016 assessing the interaction of HIV infection and granuloma formation in TB patients revealed no significant change of granuloma formation in HIV-infected TB patients. However, most of the reviewed studies, apart from two, reported slight reduction of granulomata, and only one of the studies showed statistical significance.[48] Therefore, to our knowledge, with this study, we provide evidence of the first significant positive correlation between CD4 count and the number of granulomata in patients with STB and concomitant HIV infection.

Study limitations

Unfortunately, time of HIV diagnosis and time of ART initiation were not recorded, which leaves us unable to explain our findings regarding CD4 cell count and timing of ART initiation. Furthermore, this lack of information does not allow us to understand the dynamics between HIV infection, ART effectiveness and the development of spinal TB. Further, we were not able to assess the duration from spinal infection to tissue sampling. The more frequently seen abscess formation within the STBHIV- could be due to long-existing TB infection before sampling. Another hypothesis is that abscess formation is a result of immunological activation, which is decreased in HIV-infected patients. In addition, we believe that some of our non-significant findings are due to the rather small sample size of our study population. Furthermore, in this retrospective folder analysis, clinical findings were not standardised, and could be biased depending on the degree of rigorous note making of the clinicians. Future studies, including the Spinal TB X cohort that we initiated in 2022, will focus on the mechanism of granuloma and abscess formation, mechanism of bony destruction and spread of the disease, as well as the role of CD4 cells in STB, based on a larger sample size.[49]

 

Conclusion

In our cohort, HIV-infected patients with STB were more likely to present with vertebral collapse, and had on average more involved vertebrae compared with HIV-uninfected patients. CD4 cell count seems to play a role in STB granuloma formation, and therefore lower CD4 cell counts may affect the spread of the disease to multilevel vertebral disease. Our results confirm the negative effect of HIV infection on the cellular immunoresponse in patients with STB, which emphasises the need for early ART in HIV-infected patients with STB.

Data availability. Data are available from the corresponding author on request.

Declaration. None.

Acknowledgements. None.

Author contributions. JS: conceptualisation, initial draft, analysis, editing/rewriting; ML: data curation, editing/rewriting; SC: data curation, editing/rewriting; RD: editing/rewriting; MH: data curation, editing/ rewriting; FT: editing/rewriting, supervision.

Funding. FT received support from the EDCTP2 programme supported by the European Union (grant number RIA2017T-2004-StatinTB). The Orthopaedic Research Unit and General Medicine and Global Health Research Unit of the University of Cape Town provided institutional support. The Spinal TB X project is supported by the AO Foundation, AO Spine (AOS-DIA-22-029-TRA). AO Spine is a clinical division of the AO Foundation - an independent medically guided not-for-profit organisation based in Davos, Switzerland.

Conflicts of interest. None.

 

References

1. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2023. Geneva: WHO, 2023.         [ Links ]

2. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2020. Geneva: WHO, 2020.         [ Links ]

3. Koch R. Die Aetiologie der Tuberkulose. Berliner Klinische Wochenschrift 1882;19:221-230.         [ Links ]

4. Raviglione MC, O'Brien RJ. Tuberculosis. In: Loscalzo J, Fauci A, Kasper D, et al (eds). Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc, 2008:1012.         [ Links ]

5. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2013. Geneva: WHO, 2014.         [ Links ]

6. Diedrich CR, O'Hern J, Wilkinson RJ. HIV-1 and the Mycobacterium tuberculosis granuloma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Tuberculosis 2016;1(98):62-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tube.2016.02.010        [ Links ]

7. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. Global HIV and AIDS statistics - fact sheet. UNAIDS, 2023. https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/fact-sheet (accessed 30 December 2023).         [ Links ]

8. Bender BS, Davidson BL, Kline R, Brown C, Quinn TC. Role of the mononuclear phagocyte system in the immunopathogenesis of human immunodeficiency virus infection and the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Clin Infect Dis 1988;10(6):1142-1154.         [ Links ]

9. Selwyn PA, Hartel D, Lewis VA, et al. A prospective study ofthe risk of tuberculosis among intravenous drug users with human immunodeficiency virus infection. N Engl J Med 1989;320(9):545-550.         [ Links ]

10. Pitchenik AE, Cole C, Russell BW, Fischl MA, Spira TJ, Snider Jr DE. Tuberculosis, atypical mycobacteriosis, and the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome among Haitian and non-Haitian patients in South Florida. Ann Intern Med 1984;101(5):641-645.         [ Links ]

11. Sunderam G, McDonald RJ, Maniatis T, Oleske J, Kapila R, Reichman LB. Tuberculosis as a manifestation of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). JAMA 1986;256(3):362-366.         [ Links ]

12. Chaisson RE, Schecter G, Theuer C, Rutherford G, Echenberg D, Hopewell P. Tuberculosis in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987;136:570-574.         [ Links ]

13. Theuer CP, Hopewell PC, Elias D, Schecter GF, Rutherford GW, Chaisson RE. Human immunodeficiency virus infection in tuberculosis patients. J Infect Dis 1990;162(1):8-12.         [ Links ]

14. Kramer F, Modilevsky T, Waliany AR, Leedom JM, Barnes PF. Delayed diagnosis of tuberculosis in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Am J Med 1990;89(4):451-456.         [ Links ]

15. Pitchenik AE, Burr J, Suarez M, Fertel D, Gonzalez G, Moas C. Human T-cell lymphotropic virus-III (HTLV-III) seropositivity and related disease among 71 consecutive patients in whom tuberculosis was diagnosed: A prospective study. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987;135(4):875-879.         [ Links ]

16. Barnes PF, Bloch AB, Davidson PT, Snider DE, Jr. Tuberculosis in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. N Engl J Med 1991;324(23):1644-1650. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199106063242307        [ Links ]

17. Sharma SK, Mohan A. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Indian J Med Res 2004;120(4):316-353.         [ Links ]

18. Kaya A, Topu Z, Fitoz S, Numanoglu N. Pulmonary tuberculosis with multifocal skeletal involvement. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 2004;61(2):133-135. https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2004.714        [ Links ]

19. Turgut M. Spinal tuberculosis (Pott's disease): Its clinical presentation, surgical management, and outcome. A survey study on 694 patients. Neurosurg Rev 2001;24(1):8-13.         [ Links ]

20. Garg RK, Somvanshi DS. Spinal tuberculosis: A review. J Spinal Cord Med 2011;34(5):440-454. https://doi.org/10.1179/2045772311Y.0000000023        [ Links ]

21. Esteves S, Catarino I, Lopes D, Sousa C. Spinal tuberculosis: Rethinking an old disease. J Spine 2017;6(358):2.         [ Links ]

22. Trecarichi EM, Di Meco E, Mazzotta V, Fantoni M. Tuberculous spondylodiscitis: Epidemiology, clinical features, treatment, and outcome. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2012;16(Suppl 2):S58-S72.         [ Links ]

23. Flamm ES. Percivall Pott: An 18th century neurosurgeon. J Neurosurg 1992;76(2):319-326. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1992.76.2.0319        [ Links ]

24. Batirel A, Erdem H, Sengoz G, et al. The course of spinal tuberculosis (Pott disease): Results of the multinational, multicentre Backbone-2 study. Clin Microbiol Infect 2015;21(11):1009-e1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2015.07.013        [ Links ]

25. Ansari S, Amanullah MF, Ahmad K, Rauniyar RK. Pott's spine: Diagnostic imaging modalities and technology advancements. N Am J Med Sci 2013;5(7):404-411. https://doi.org/10.4103/1947-2714.115775        [ Links ]

26. Diedrich CR, O'Hern J, Wilkinson RJ. HIV-1 and the Mycobacterium tuberculosis granuloma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Tuberculosis 2016;98:62-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tube.2016.02.010        [ Links ]

27. Anley CM, Brandt AD, Dunn R. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in spinal tuberculosis: Comparison of HIV positive and negative patients. Indian J Orthop 2012;46 (2):186-190. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.93688        [ Links ]

28. Marais S, Roos I, Mitha A, Mabusha SJ, Patel V, Bhigjee AI. Spinal tuberculosis: Clinicoradiological findings in 274 patients. Clin Infect Dis 2018;67(1):89-98. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy020        [ Links ]

29. Held M, Laubscher M, Zar HJ, Dunn RN. GeneXpert polymerase chain reaction for spinal tuberculosis: An accurate and rapid diagnostic test. Bone Joint J 2014;96-B(10):1366-1369. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.96B10.34048        [ Links ]

30. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013;310(20):2191-2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053        [ Links ]

31. Truzzi JC, de Almeida FG, Sacomani CA, Reis J, Rocha FET. Neurogenic bladder - concepts and treatment recommendations. Int Braz J Urol 2022;48(2):220-243. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677-5538.Ibju.2021.0098        [ Links ]

32. Wippold FJ II. Focal neurologic deficit. Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29(10):1998-2000.         [ Links ]

33. Godlwana L, Gounden P, Ngubo P, Nsibande T, Nyawo K, Puckree T. Incidence and profile of spinal tuberculosis in patients at the only public hospital admitting such patients in KwaZulu-Natal. Spinal Cord 2008;46(5):372-374. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3102150        [ Links ]

34. Dunn R, Zondagh I, Candy S. Spinal tuberculosis: Magnetic resonance imaging and neurological impairment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36(6):469-473. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e3181d265c0        [ Links ]

35. Danaviah S, Sacks JA, Kumar KP, et al. Immunohistological characterisation of spinal TB granulomas from HIV-negative and -positive patients. Tuberculosis 2013;93(4):432-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tube.2013.02.009        [ Links ]

36. Churchyard GJ, Mametja LD, Mvusi L, et al. Tuberculosis control in South Africa: Successes, challenges and recommendations. S Afr Med J 2014;104(3 Suppl 1):S244-S248. https://doi.org/10.7196/samj.7689        [ Links ]

37. Polley P, Dunn R. Noncontiguous spinal tuberculosis: Incidence and management. Eur Spine J 2009;18(8):1096-1101.         [ Links ]

38. Weinstein MA, Eismont FJ. Infections of the spine in patients with human immunodeficiency virus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87(3):604-609. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.C01062        [ Links ]

39. Dunn RN, Castelein S, Held M. Impact of HIV on spontaneous spondylodiscitis. Bone Joint J 2019;101-B(5):617-620. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.101B5.BJJ-2018-0960.R1        [ Links ]

40. Govender S, Annamalai K, Kumar KP, Govender UG. Spinal tuberculosis in HIV positive and negative patients: Immunological response and clinical outcome. Int Orthop 2000;24(3):163-166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002640000125        [ Links ]

41. Wang P, Liao W, Cao G, Jiang Y, Rao J, Yang Y. Characteristics and management of spinal tuberculosis in tuberculosis endemic area of Guizhou Province: A retrospective study of 597 patients in a teaching hospital. Biomed Res Int 2020:1468457. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1468457        [ Links ]

42. Jain AK. Tuberculosis of spine: Research evidence to treatment guidelines. Indian J Orthop 2016;50(1):3-9. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.173518        [ Links ]

43. Sagane SS, Patil VS, Bartakke GD, Kale KY. Assessment of clinical and radiological parameters in spinal tuberculosis: Comparison between human immunodeficiency virus-positive and human immunodeficiency virus-negative patients. Asian Spine J 2020;14(6):857-863. https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2019.0251        [ Links ]

44. Geldmacher C, Zumla A, Hoelscher M. Interaction between HIV and Mycobacterium tuberculosis: HIV-1-induced CD4 T-cell depletion and the development of active tuberculosis. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 2012;7(3):268-275. https://doi.org/10.1097/COH.0b013e3283524e32        [ Links ]

45. Hilhorst M, Shirai T, Berry G, Goronzy JJ, Weyand CM. T cell-macrophage interactions and granuloma formation in vasculitis. Front Immunol 2014;5:432. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2014.00432        [ Links ]

46. Di Perri G, Cazzadori A, Vento S, et al. Comparative histopathological study of pulmonary tuberculosis in human immunodeficiency virus-infected and non-infected patients. Tuber Lung Dis 1996;77(3):244-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0962-8479(96)90008-8        [ Links ]

47. Heyderman RS, Makunike R, Muza T, et al Pleural tuberculosis in Harare, Zimbabwe: The relationship between human immunodeficiency virus, CD4 lymphocyte count, granuloma formation and disseminated disease. Trop Med Int Health 1998;3(1):14-20. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3156.1998.00167.x        [ Links ]

48. Kennedy DJ, Lewis WP, Barnes PF. Yield of bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Chest 1992;102(4):1040-1044. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.102.4.1040        [ Links ]

49. Scherer J, Mukasa SL, Wolmarans K, et al Comparing gene expression profiles of adults with isolated spinal tuberculosis to disseminated spinal tuberculosis identified by 18FDG-PET/CT at time of diagnosis, 6- and 12-months follow-up: Classifying clinical stages of spinal tuberculosis and monitoring treatment response (Spinal TB X cohort study). J Orthopaedic Surg Res 2024;19(1):376. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-04840-7        [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence:
J Scherer
schjul017@myuct.ac.za

Received 26 March 2024
Accepted 30 July 2024.