Services on Demand
Journal
Article
Indicators
Related links
- Cited by Google
- Similars in Google
Share
South African Journal of Animal Science
On-line version ISSN 2221-4062Print version ISSN 0375-1589
S. Afr. j. anim. sci. vol.52 n.2 Pretoria 2022
https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v52i2.12
Evaluation of growth, carcass and meat quality characteristics of grain-fed Charolais and Charolais x Nguni bulls
P.E. StrydomI, #; M. Hope-JonesII
IDepartment of Animal Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7602, South Africa
IIAnimal Production Institute, Agricultural Research Council, Private Bag X2, Irene, South Africa
ABSTRACT
The study investigated the effect of crossbreeding Charolais bulls with Nguni cows on carcass and lean yield and meat quality characteristics. The intact Charolais bulls (n=10) served as control group against the Charolais x Nguni (n=10). The Nguni dam proved a good option for a dam line because of the hardiness of the breed, its mothering ability, ease of calving, and low maintenance cost. In contrast, the Charolais had excellent growth and carcass characteristics. It was a late maturing breed with better growth performance and higher yields than Charolais x Nguni, which could be classified as a medium maturing beef breed. Over the same duration and conditions of feeding the Charolais calves had better feed conversion and growth rates and produced larger carcasses than Charolais x Nguni calves. Owing to the large difference in carcass size, the Charolais had better meat to bone ratio than the Charolais x Nguni (P <0.001). Both breeds produced meat with a desirable appearance and good eating quality and no differences were recorded in the related traits. It could be concluded that Charolais and Charolais x Nguni weaned calves were well suited to the grain-fed market and would produce meat of acceptable quality.
Keywords: calpains, cross-breeding, meat colour, meat tenderness
Introduction
Efficiency of meat production is continuously under pressure for economic and environmental reasons. On the one hand, estimated exponential human population growth to 8.9 billion in 2050 - coupled with increased per capita consumption of meat by the growing middle class in developing countries - would lead to an increase in demand of 32% for meat in developing countries and 14% in developed countries by 2030 (Alexandratos et al., 2006). On the other hand, agriculture and meat production contribute to a large proportion of anthropogenic greenhouse gasses and to the carbon footprint (Steinfeld et al., 2006). Advancements in genetics, nutrition, animal health management and reproductive performance could reduce greenhouse gasses (Capper, 2011; Place et al., 2011; Mokolobate et al., 2019). Opinions are divided about optimal animal size in relation to sustainable production and production efficiency. It seems that this controversy revolves around production systems. For rangeland production, Scasta et al. (2016) reported that smaller cow size allowed for larger herds, leading to higher beef yields and a higher efficiency ratio. In contrast, under intensive production systems, animals with higher slaughter weights were sought after (Capper, 2011; Place et al., 2011).
Africa has a large number of indigenous breeds that have adapted to climatic conditions (Scholtz, 1988; Scholtz & Lombard, 1992; Mirkena et al., 2010; Scholtz et al., 2010; Marufu et al., 2011; Mokolobate et al., 2014). Since most beef animals produced in South Africa are grain fed, the low mature size of the Nguni negates its favourable characteristics. Scholtz & Theunissen (2010), supported by Calegare et al. (2007), therefore proposed that the Nguni cow should be used in terminal crossbreeding programmes using larger beef breeds as sire lines. Offspring should then be finished in grain-fed systems. Dystocia has long been a concern with the use of terminal sire breeds (Sagebiel et al., 1969). Scholtz & Theunissen (2010) recorded no calving difficulties when Chianina, Charolais, Simmental and Hereford were used as sire lines on Nguni cows and concluded that the Nguni dam could suppress birth weight without material consequence for subsequent growth. The ratio of weaning weight of the calf to the dam weight, the estimate of cow herd productivity, was 57.2 for the Charolais-Nguni cross compared versus 49.3 for the pure Nguni and 43.8 for the national average of all breeds in South Africa. In efficiency parameters (Scholtz & Theunissen, 2010), the Charolais was superior when utilized as terminal sire in cross-breeding, which agreed with Olentine et al. (1976), Southgate et al. (1982), Baker et al. (1987), and Casas & Cundiff (2003). Charolais-Brahman crossed steers grown on pasture and in feedlots also showed superior carcass characteristics to Brahman crosses with Santa Gertrudis, Hereford, Angus and Shorthorn, and were matched only by Limousin crosses (Schutt et al., 2009a).
Compared to other breeds tested under the National Beef Cattle Performance Testing Scheme (Anonymous 2010), Charolais ha higher growth potential. However, because of the climate, the pure bred Charolais is not suitable for large parts of southern Africa.
Although carcass yield and efficiency will be of paramount importance in meeting increased demand for meat over the next decades, consumers have the final say in appearance and palatability of the product (Acebrón & Dopico, 2000; Grunert et al., 2004). MacNeil & Matjuda (2007) emphasised traits such as calf survival and weaning weight when using the Charolais as sire breed on the Nguni dam in a multi-trait selection programme. In this study the authors attempted to demonstrate the suitability of the Nguni dam and Charolais sire, by characterizing the carcass and meat yield and meat quality of Nguni-Charolais crossbred animals compared with purebred Charolais under grain-fed conditions.
Materials and Methods
The procedures for sourcing, transporting, feeding and slaughtering the animals were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Agricultural Research Council (ARC), Animal Production Campus (APIEC 01/2003). Treatment groups consisted of 10 intact male animals of pure Charolais origin and 10 intact male Charolais-Nguni crosses. Charolais weaned calves, 8-9 months old and unrelated to each other, were selected and supplied by the Charolais Cattle Breeders' Society of South Africa as a representative group of Charolais animals. Charolais-Nguni crosses were selected from the crossbreeding scheme of the ARC at Loskop Experimental Farm (25.1674° S, 29.3987° E), Groblersdal, Mpumalanga, South Africa. The Nguni cows that produced these calves had been inseminated by selected Charolais bulls provided by the Charolais Cattle Breeders' Society of South Africa.
All the animals were weighed twice on consecutive days, tagged and processed upon arrival at ARC-Animal Production Research Institute, Irene, Gauteng, South Africa, where they were grain fed and slaughtered. All yield and meat quality evaluations were performed at the same institute. Anabolic implants were not applied. Because of poor rainfall and thus early weaning, Charolais-Nguni animals (average weight 171 kg) were adapted to concentrate for 21 days to a starting weight of 190 kg. Charolais animals were adapted for 14 days. The animals of each group were kept in two feeding pens (10 m x 20 m). Feed intake was monitored on a group basis. After initial processing, live weights were recorded weekly to determine average daily gain (ADG). A balanced dry feedlot ration, providing 11 MJ ME energy/kg, 135 g crude protein/kg, 4 g phosphorus/kg , 8 g calcium/kg and 80 g crude fibre/kg on a dry matter basis (DM), was used throughout the trial (after adaptation). The diet consisted (DM base per/kg) of 62 g hominy chop, 15 g wheat bran, 10 g molasses meal, 5 g cotton oil cake meal, 4.5 g grass hay, 1.6 g feed lime, 1.3 g urea, salt and a vitamin/mineral premix.
Because of the relatively low starting weight, to reach a marketable carcass weight of at least 220 kg and fat code 2 (Anonymous, 1999), the Charolais-Nguni were grain fed for 140 days, whereas the Charolais calves were fed for 120 days. Carcasses were stimulated electrically (500 V, 2A output and 15 oscillations per second) after exsanguination. Warm carcass weights were recorded to calculate total yield and dressing percentage. Carcasses were chilled directly after dressing until a deep buttock muscle temperature of 10 °C was reached. Cold carcass weights were recorded before processing. One side of each carcass was processed into 15 retail cuts (Figure 1). Each cut was separated into meat (muscle and intermuscular fat), subcutaneous fat and bone. Carcass composition was calculated per cut and on an individual tissue basis (fat, bone and lean).
All samples were collected from the Musculus longissimus thoracis et lumborum (LT, LL) from the eighth rib in the direction of the rump after rigor mortis. These tests were conducted: i) meat tenderness measured by Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF), and myofibril fragment length (MFL) on LL at three days and 14 days post mortem at 2 ± 1 °C; ii) sarcomere length measured at 24 hours post mortem; iii) proteinase enzyme measured as μ and m-calpain and calpastatin activity at 24 hours post mortem; iv) collagen properties; v) Instrumental colour on fresh samples 24 hours post mortem; and vi) proximate analyses of muscle fat (intramuscular fat).
Aged LL samples for WBSF were frozen at -20 °C and processed into 30 mm steaks with a band saw. The frozen steaks were thawed at 2 ± 1 °C for 24 hours and cooked with an oven-broiling (Mielé, model H217, Mielé & Cie, Gütersloh, Germany) method with direct radiant heat (American Meat Science Association (AMSA), 1995). The steaks were broiled at 260 °C (pre-set) to 70 °C internal temperature. Internal temperature was monitored individually with a 30-gauge thermocouple placed in the geometric centre of the steak and attached to a digital monitor (Comark C9003, Comark Ltd, Hertfordshire, UK). The steaks were turned when the internal temperature reached 35 °C to attain a final temperature of 70 °C before being removed from the oven and cooled to 18 °C. Six round cores (12.7 mm diameter) were removed from the steaks parallel to the muscle fibres (AMSA, 1995). Each core was sheared once through the centre, perpendicular to the fibre, with a Warner-Bratzler shear device mounted on Universal Instron apparatus (Model 4301, Instron Ltd, Buckinghamshire, England) (crosshead speed 20 mm/min). The means of six recordings were used as a shear value measured in Newtons.
Samples for sarcomere lengths of a fresh LT muscle (24 hours post mortem), were prepared (Hegarty & Naudé, 1970) with distilled water instead of Ringer Locke solution (Dreyer et al., 1979). Fifty sarcomeres per sample were measured with video image analysis (VIA) with an Olympus B x 40 system microscope at 1000 x magnification equipped with CC12 video camera (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). AnalySIS Life Science software package (Soft Imaging Systems Gmbh, Münster, Germany) was used to process and quantify measurements. Myofibril fragment lengths of LL aged for three days and 14 days post mortem were measured with VIA. Myofibrils were extracted according to Culler et al. (1978) as modified by Heinze & Bruggemann (1994). One hundred myofibril fragments per sample were examined and measured with an Olympus B x 40 system microscope at 400 x magnification. Samples collected for enzyme studies (24 hours post mortem) were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and preserved at -70 °C. Calpastatin, μ-calpain and m-calpain were extracted from 5 g of the LL frozen samples (Dransfield,1996) and separated with the two-step gradient ion-exchange chromatography-method (Geesink & Koohmaraie, 1999). Calpain assays were determined with azo-casein as substrate (Dransfield, 1996). The use of azo-casein eliminates background absorbance of non-specific proteins in the extracts. One unit of calpain activity was defined as an increase in absorbance at 366 nm of 1.0 per hour, at 25 °C. One unit of calpastatin activity was defined as the amount that inhibited 1 unit of m-calpain activity. Results were expressed as units per gram of muscle. Frozen samples of the LL were analysed for collagen content and solubility (Bergman & Loxley, 1963; Hill, 1966; Weber, 1973) and for chemical composition of protein, fat, moisture and ash (AOAC, 2019).
Meat colour was measured with a Minolta meter (Model CR200, Osaka, Japan) on fresh samples (24 hours post mortem). Two freshly cut steaks of 15 mm thickness each of the LL were allowed to bloom for 60 minutes at chiller temperatures (4 °C ± 2 °C) before recording. Three recordings were performed on each steak. The data were obtained as L* (dark to light); a* (green to red) and b* (blue to yellow) values from which colour intensity, chroma (S) saturation index = ((a2 + b2)1/2 ), and hue angle, or the movement away from the fundamental red colour, were calculated (MacDougal, 1977).
Data of WBSF, MFL and enzyme activities were subject to analysis of variance for a split-plot design using the GenStat® software (VSN International Ltd., Hemel Hempstead, UK). There were two breed groups (Charolais and Charolais-Nguni) as whole plots and two ageing periods (3 and 14 days, and 1 and 24 hours post mortem) as sub-plots. The rest of the data were subject to normal analysis of variance with breed as main effect. Statistical analyses were not performed on growth performance data because each breed type was fed in a single group and only raw mean values were tabled. The data were normally distributed with homogeneous treatment variances. No significant interactions were detected between breed and post mortem ageing. Means were separated with Fisher's protected t-test least significant difference at the 5% level of significance (Snedecor & Cochran, 1980).
Results and Discussion
Means for growth performance and carcass measurements are presented in Table 1. The Charolais and Charolais-Nguni started the trial at average live weights of 236 and 171 kg, respectively. The weight of the Charolais calves coincided with the national average weaning. However, the Charolais-Nguni calves were almost 20 kg heavier than the average Nguni weaning weight according to NBCIS (Anonymous 2010). The Charolais gained 800 g/day more weight than the Charolais-Nguni, and needed 0.5 kg less feed per kg weight gain. The Charolais gained 281 kg and the Charolais-Nguni 208 kg over 122 and 140 days. Charolais produced a carcass of 311 kg, 87 kg heavier than the Charolais-Nguni on average, and dressed out 1.5% points higher than the Charolais-Nguni because of higher slaughter weight. Larger animals at the same carcass fat level would dress out higher than smaller animals (Berg & Butterfield, 1978). Jones et al. (1984) and Strydom et al. (2008) confirmed this maturity type effect, accounting for the differences in dressing percentage to lower proportional yields of the fifth quarter parts for the larger animals.
The rib fat measurements of both breeds indicated very lean carcasses in the fat code 1 category (1.0 to 3.6 mm rib fat thickness; fat class range 0 to 6) (Government Notice R.342 of 19 March 1999). Average daily gain of the Charolais-Nguni was lower (200 g/day) but the feed conversion ratio (FCR) was better (1.1 kg feed per kg gain) than data recorded by Scholtz & Theunissen (2010). Whereas this study showed a better performance for Charolais-Nguni, the current study recorded much better performances for Charolais. The diet composition was not published, but animals were tested in the phase C performance testing programme, consisting of a 35-day adaptation period followed by a 140-day test. Diet composition might have contributed to the differences between the studies. Strydom et al. (2008) reported on feedlot performances of pure Nguni steers implanted twice with anabolic growth promoters and raised on the same diet as the present trial. In two trials Nguni gained 1.3 and 1.5 kg per day on average with FCRs of 5.2 to 5.9 kg feed/kg gain over 97 days and 132, respectively. The animals started the trial at 151 kg and 169 kg, which was higher in the second trial than the breed standard weaning weight of 151 kg (Anonymous 2010). In the light of this evidence, the growth potential of the Charolais-Nguni group was expected to be better, but could be ascribed to a low weaning weight, consequent slow adaptation to feedlot conditions, and double anabolic implants in the steer trial. Carcass weights of Charolais-Nguni bulls were higher than the first group of Nguni steers (188 kg) but the same as the second group, whereas Charolais-Nguni dressed out higher than both groups (55% and 58% vs. 59%). Both Nguni groups were fatter than the animals in the present trial at slaughter (7 mm vs. 2.9 mm rib fat).
The carcass of the Charolais had slightly less subcutaneous fat (SCF) (P =0.08), significantly less bone (1.5% units) and more meat (meat = muscle + intramuscular fat) (2.3 % units) (P <0.001) than the Charolais-Nguni carcass (Table 2). Because the percentage of SCF (visible fat on the dressed carcass) was almost the same, it meant that for every kg bone the Charolais and Charolais-Nguni had 5.3 and 4.7 kg meat, a difference of 0.6 kg. Berg & Butterfield (1978), Kempster (1978), De Bruyn (1991) and Casas & Cundiff (2003) reported that carcasses of larger later maturing breeds had a greater meat to bone ratio at the same fatness, although there were exceptions. Kempster (1978) found that early maturing Angus showed a higher meat to bone ratio than the larger Simmentaler at a similar conformation score and SCF level.
The yields of 15 wholesale cuts were expressed relative to carcass weight. Significant differences were recorded between the breeds for the yields of the chuck, brisket, topside, thick flank, thin flank and loin cuts. However, these differences was relatively small and probably of little commercial significance. The differences were <0.4% for the neck, shin, shoulder, prime rib, wing rib, topside, silverside, loin, fillet and rump; and between 0.5% and 0.9% for the thick flank, and thin flank, with only the chuck differing by 1%. Strydom et al. (2008) recorded yield from steers for the buttock that was trimmed only of excess SCF and intermuscular fat. Although carcass weight of the second Nguni group in that study was comparable with those evaluated in this study, trimmed fat was more than 12%, whereas trimming in the present trial would have been minimal. Therefore the Charolais-Nguni cross should yield more meat at comparable carcass fatness than pure Nguni. For similar reasons, the Charolais in this study yielded more meat (36 kg) than the Charolais-Nguni. When the proportional yields of the prime rib, wing rib, topside, silver side, loin, thick flank, fillet and rump were added together, there was no significant difference in the total high-priced cuts between the two breeds. These cuts made up 40% of the carcass weight. In addition, the distributions of SCF, meat and bone in the high-priced cuts were similar, so proportionally the two groups had the same distribution of tissue in the more expensive hindquarter cuts. On average, 24%, 43% and 47% of the total carcass bone, meat and SCF, respectively, were present in the high-priced cuts that are normally sold as deboned trimmed cuts. Strydom et al. (2000a) showed that there was little variation in distribution of meat, fat and bone among breeds, including the Nguni, when they were compared at a constant SCF level that was similar to that of the present trial. Schutt et al.(2009a) found that only Brahman-Limousin crossbreds had a higher retail beef yield adjusted to common carcass weights in a crossbreeding study that included Charolais, Belmont Red, Santa Gertrudis, Hereford, Angus, Shorthorn as sire breeds and pure Brahman. The Limousin and Charolais carcasses were leanest at a common carcass weight. This would have been the case in the present trial. The Charolais-Nguni recorded a higher proportion of kidney and channel fat than the Charolais (P <0.001) (Table 2). On average at carcass weights of 224 kg and 312 kg, the amount of kidney fat was 7.4 kg for Charolais-Nguni and 7.9 kg for Charolais.
Meat quality related data are presented in Table 3. Marbling, measured as intramuscular fat (IMF), did not differ between the two groups. Marbling level was very low ranging between 16.5 g/kg and 17.5 g/kg loin muscle, which could be attributed to the general young age and lean condition of both groups at slaughter. Schutt et al. (2009b) recorded an IMF fat level of 2.72% (27.2 g/kg) for Charolais x Brahman cross animals finished on pasture at two years old, whereas the P8 fat measurement was 9.1 mm. This IMF value was lower only than Shorthorn and Angus crosses, which also recorded higher P8 fat values.Shear force values for Charolais and Charolais-Nguni were similar at three and 14 days post mortem. In terms of threshold values for consumer acceptability (Shackelford et al., 1991) - namely 45 N and 38 N for 'retail' and 'food service' beef - two days ageing was not sufficient to ensure consumer satisfaction, irrespective of breed. Prolonged ageing would satisfy the consumer. According to Boleman et al. (1997), 95% of consumers would have paid a premium for the steaks that were aged for 14 days. Meat varies in tenderness at slaughter because of ante-mortem factors (breed, nutrition, age) and conditions during slaughter and then improves during post-mortem ageing (Koohmaraie et al., 2003). Electrical stimulation counteracts excessive rigor shortening in extreme chilling conditions, but could facilitate further improvement in tenderness via enhancing or accelerating proteolysis (Ferguson et al., 2000, Devine et al., 2001). Therefore, electrical stimulation contributed to the low final WBS values recorded for both breeds. With regard to rigor shortening, Marsh & Leet (1966) stated that post-mortem sarcomere length changes of less than 20% produced almost negligible effects on beef tenderness. If resting sarcomere length of bovine muscle were taken as 2.1 nm (Marsh & Carse, 1974), then mean percentage shortening for the Charolais and Charolais-Nguni would have been 9% and 18%, respectively. Therefore, shortening differences between the two groups in this low range (<20%) would be expected to exert little effect, although the slightly higher WBS value of the Charolais-Nguni at two days may have caused by mild shortening (toughening), despite electrical stimulation. Postmortem tenderisation was characterized by measuring the amounts of active calcium dependent protease at 24 hours post mortem and of structural breakdown by measuring the myofibrillar lengths at two and 14 days post mortem. The calcium dependent protease system (CDP), consisting of two proteolytic enzymes, m- and mu-calpain and calpastatin, an inhibitor, is a significant role player in meat tenderization (Koohmaraie & Geesink, 2006) . Although m (P =0.079) and mu calpain (P = 0.055) activities tended to be higher in Charolais samples (P<0.10), this did not reflect in a higher level of tenderization in Charolais LL. In addition, the degree of myofibrillar breakdown (shorter MFLs) was the same for the two groups at three and 14 days, which supported the low and similar WBSF values at 14 days for both groups.
As well as sarcomere shortening and the CDP system, connective tissue properties (stromal proteins) are the third factor involved in tenderness. Connective tissue forms the basic framework of muscle structure and consists mainly of collagen. Because proteolytic weakening of this structure post mortem is limited (Nishimura et al., 1995), connective tissue is involved mostly in baseline tenderness (Valin, 1995). Although the total LD collagen content of the breed types was the same, Charolais samples had a higher soluble (P <0.001) and lower heat stable collagen proportion (P =0.003) compared with the Charolais-Nguni. Similar to the differences in the CDP, μ-calpain, differences in collagen properties did not reflect in WBSF values. The total collagen concentration and mature crosslinks of muscle have an additive (negative) effect on meat tenderness (McCormick, 1994). However, the loin muscle is a low connective tissue muscle (Rhee et al., 2004) and differences in connective tissue properties between the breeds did not probably play a significant role in tenderness expression.
The initial tenderness of the two breeds compared favourably with breeds from the first trial of Strydom et al. (2008) (Bonsmara, Nguni, Drakensberger, Tuli; implanted steers) and was better than that of the Brahman. Tenderness after ageing was slightly better (±5 N) in the present trial and coincided with shorter MFLs after 14 days compared with Strydom et al. (2008) after 14 days. Under slaughter conditions like those used in the present trial, the sarcomere lengths of the breeds in Strydom et al. (2008) were similar to those of the Charolais-Nguni (1.7μm). The total collagen levels compared favourably with various South African breeds (Strydom et al., 2000b) (Bonsmara, Brown Swiss, Afrikaner, Nguni), whereas the soluble collagen portion of Charolais was much higher than these breeds (37% vs 15% to 21%) probably suggesting a breed phenomenon. The soluble fraction of the Charolais-Nguni (20%) coincided with that of the Nguni (21%) in Strydom et al., 2000b.
The ratios for bound water (water-binding capacity) and drip loss were the same for the Charolais and Charolais-Nguni. Similar values for the two attributes were reported by Strydom et al. (2008), whereas there was little variation among breeds such as Nguni, Bonsmara, Brahman, Drakensberger and Tuli. Similarly, Schutt et al. (2009b) recorded very small differences in cooking loss among breed crosses (Brahman dam), including Charolais, Limousin Hereford, Belmont Red, Santa Gertrudis, Shorthorn and Angus. Only pure Brahman recorded higher cooking loss. When related only to moisture loss, cooking loss is an indication of water-holding capacity (Honikel, 1998).
Colour is an important quality characteristic of meat for the consumer at the point of purchase. Most consumers prefer and willing pay premiums for bright cherry red coloured beef (Troy & Kerry, 2010). Colour can be adversely affected by numerous factors (Kropf, 1993, Manchini & Hunt, 2005). In the present study muscle colour was determined only at a single point after blooming. Neither chroma nor reflectance differed between groups. The hue angle of Charolais tended to be higher than that of Charolais-Nguni (P <0.07), indicating a less redness and more metmyoglobin in the Charolais samples. Therefore under controlled production slaughter conditions, small or no differences in meat colour are expected between these groups. Although actual trial conditions may have an effect on colour display in meat, Strydom et al. (2008) showed slightly higher values for chroma for Nguni loins in one trial and similar values in a second trial. Differences in chroma in both phases of the project were small, and only Bonsmara steers recorded higher chroma in phase 1 compared with other breed groups. Thus large breed differences in colour are not expected when production and processing conditions are ideal. Reflectance or lightness in the current trial corresponded with values reported by Strydom et al. (2008) for Nguni and other breeds.
Conclusions
Crossbreeding with extreme maturity types such as Nguni and Charolais produced carcass weight that should be more acceptable than that of the smaller breed. However, the carcass of the crossbred animal would have a lower meat-to-bone ratio in general, and a similar ratio in higher priced cuts of the hindquarter and mid carcass. The authors recommend a crossbreeding programme that utilizes a large frame sire breed such as the Charolais and a smaller frame dam breed such as the Nguni to produce high-quality carcasses suitable for a market aimed medium-size carcasses, that is, 220-230 kg. Such a programme would take advantage of the lower maintenance costs, reproduction efficiency and hardiness of the Nguni and superior growth and carcass characteristics of the Charolais.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the personnel of Agricultural Research Council-Animal Production Campus, Irene, for assistance with the experimental work, Mrs Marie Smith for assistance with statistical analyses of data, Agricultural Research Council for use of facilities, and the Charolais and Nguni Cattle Breeders' Societies for financial and in-kind support.
Authors' contributions
PES developed the original hypotheses, designed the experiments, collaborated in interpreting the results, and finalized the manuscript. PES and MHJ collected the data for this study, conducted the statistical analyses in collaboration with Mrs M. Smith, and collaborated in interpretation of the results. PES wrote the initial draft of this manuscript, and both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict of interest declaration
The authors have no conflict of interest relative to the contents of this study.
References
Acebrón, L.B. & Dopico, D.C., 2000. The importance of intrinsic and extrinsic cues to expected and experienced quality: An empirical application for beef. Food Qual. Pref. 11, 229-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0950-3293(99)00059-2 [ Links ]
Alexandratos, N., Bruinsma, J., Bödeker, G., Schmidhuber, J., Broca, S., Shetty, P. & Grazia Ottaviani, M., 2006. World Agriculture: Towards 2030/2050. Interim Report: Prospects for Food, Nutrition, Agriculture and Major Commodity Groups, Global Perspective Studies Unit, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Roma. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/esag/docs/Interim_report_AT2050web.pdf [ Links ]
AMSA (American Meat Science Association), 1995. Research guidelines for cookery, sensory evaluation and instrumental tenderness of fresh meat. National Livestock and Meat Board. Chicago, USA. [ Links ]
Anonymous, 1999. Government Notice No. R.342 of 19 March 1999. Regulations regarding the classification and marking of meat. Government Gazette of the Republic of South Africa, 19 March 1999. [ Links ]
Anonymous, 2010. Statistics of the National Beef Cattle Improvement Scheme 1993-1998. In: M.M. Scholtz (ed). Beef breeding in South Africa. Second edition. Agricultural Research Council, Animal Improvement Institute, Irene, South Africa. Pp. 147-149 [ Links ]
AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists), 2019. Official methods of analysis. 21st edition. AOAC, Washington DC. [ Links ]
Baker, J.F., Bryson, W.L. & Knutson, R., 1987. Feed intake and growth during finishing of Angus-, Charolais- and Piedmontese-sired calves when slaughtered at similar measurements of subcutaneous fat. J. Anim. Sci. 65 (Suppl.), 10-12. [ Links ]
Berg, R.T. & Butterfield, R.M., 1978. New concepts of cattle growth. Edition 2. Sydney University Press, Sydney. [ Links ]
Bergman, I. & Loxley, R., 1963. Two improved and simplified methods for the spectrophotometric determination of hydroxyproline. Anal. Chem. 35, 1961-1965. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60205a053 [ Links ]
Boleman, S.J., Boleman, S.L., Miller, R.K., Taylor, J.F., Cross, H.R., Wheeler, T.L., Koohmaraie, M., Shackelford, S.D., Miller, M.F., West, R.L., Johnson, D.D. & Savell, J.W., 1997. Consumer evaluation of beef of known categories of tenderness. J. Anim. Sci. 75,1521-1524. https://doi.org/10.2527/1997.7561521x [ Links ]
Calegare, L., Alencar, M.M., Packer, I.U. & Lanna, D.P.D., 2007. Energy requirements and cow/calf efficiency of Nellore and continental and British Bos taurus χ Nellore crosses. J. Anim. Sci. 85, 2413-2422. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-448 [ Links ]
Capper, J.L., 2011. The environmental impact of beef production in the United States: 1977 compared with 2007. J. Anim. Sci. 89, 4249-4261. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3784 [ Links ]
Casas, E. & Cundiff, L.V., 2003. Maternal grandsire, granddam, and sire breed effects on growth and carcass traits of crossbred cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 81, 904-911. https://doi.org/10.2527/2003.814904x [ Links ]
Culler, R.D., Parrish, F.C. Jr., Smith G.C. & Cross, H.R., 1978. Relationship of myofibril fragmentation index to certain chemical, physical and sensory characteristics of bovine longissimus muscle. J. Food Sci. 43, 1177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1978.tb15263.x [ Links ]
De Bruyn, J.F., 1991. Production and product characteristics of different cattle genotypes under feedlot conditions. DSc. thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa. [ Links ]
Devine, C.E., Wells, R., Cook, C.J. & Payne, S.R., 2001. Does high voltage electrical stimulation of sheep affect rate of[ tenderisation. New Zeal. J. Agric. Res. 44, 53-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.2001.9513462 [ Links ]
Dransfield, E., 1996. Calpains from thaw rigor muscle. Meat Sci. 43, 311-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0309-1740(96)00022-8 [ Links ]
Dreyer, J.H., Van Rensburg, A.J.J., Naudé, R.T., Gouws, P.J., & Stiemie, S, 1979. The effect of chilling temperatures and mode of suspension of beef carcasses on sarcomere length and meat tenderness. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 9, 1-9. [ Links ]
Ferguson, D.M., Jiang, S-T., Hearnshaw, H., Rymill, S.R. & Thompson, J.M., 2000. Effect of electrical stimulation on protease activity and tenderness of M. longissimus from cattle with different proportions of Bos indicus content. Meat Sci. 55, 265-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0309-1740(99)00131-x [ Links ]
Geesink, G.H., & Koohmaraie, M., 1999. A rapid method for quantification of calpain and calpastatin activities in muscle. J. Anim. Sci. 77, 3225-3229. https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.77123225x [ Links ]
Gerrard, F. & Mallion, F.J., 1977. The complete book of meat. Virtue & Co., London, UK. [ Links ]
Grunert, K.G., Bredahl, L., & Bruns0, K., 2004. Consumer perception of meat quality and implications for product development in the meat sector - A review. Meat Sci. 66, 259-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0309-1740(03)00130-x [ Links ]
Government Notice No. R.342 of 19 March 1999. Regulations regarding the classification and marking of meat. Government Gazette of the Republic of South Africa. Government Printer, Pretoria. [ Links ]
Heinze, P.H. & Bruggemann, D., 1994. Ageing of beef: Influence of two ageing methods on sensory properties and myofibrillar proteins. Sci. Aliments. 14, 387. [ Links ]
Hill, F., 1966. The solubility of intramuscular collagen on meat animals of various ages. J. Food Sci. 31, 161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1966.tb00472.x [ Links ]
Hegarty, P.V.J. & Naudé, R.T., 1970. The accuracy of measurement of individual skeletal muscle fibres separated by a rapid technique. Lab. Pract. 19, 161. [ Links ]
Honikel, K.O., 1998. Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat. Meat Sci. 49, 447-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0309-1740(98)00034-5 [ Links ]
Jones, S.D.M., Rompala, R.E., Wilton, J.W. & Watson, C.H., 1984. Empty body weights, carcass weights and offal proportions in bulls and steers of different mature size. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 64, 53-57. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas84-007 [ Links ]
Kempster, A.J.,1978. Bone growth and development with particular reference to breed differences in carcass shape and lean to bone ratio. In: H. Boer & J. Martin (eds). Patterns of growth and development in cattle. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague. Pp. 149-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9756-1_9 [ Links ]
Koohmaraie, M. &., Geesink, G.H., 2006. Contribution of postmortem muscle biochemistry to the delivery of consistent meat quality with particular focus on the calpain system. Meat Sci. 74, 34-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.04.025 [ Links ]
Koohmaraie, M., Veiseth, E., Kent, S.D., Shackleford, S.D. & Wheeler, T.L., 2003. Understanding and managing variation in tenderness. Proc. 11th International Meat Symposium, 29-30 January 2003. Agricultural Research Council of South Africa, Irene, South Africa. Pp.3-13 [ Links ]
Kropf, D.H., 1993. Colour stability. Factors affecting the colour of fresh meat. Meat Focus Int. 2, 269-275. [ Links ]
MacNeil, M.D. & Matjuda, L.E., 2007 .Breeding objectives for Angus and Charolais specialized sire lines for use in the emerging sector of South African beef production. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 37, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v37i1.4019 [ Links ]
Mancini, R.A. & Hunt, M.C., 2005. Review: Current research in meat color. Meat Sci. 71, 100-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.03.003 [ Links ]
Marsh, B.B. & Carse, W.A., 1974. Meat tenderness and the sliding filament hypothesis. J. Food Tech. 9, 129-139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1974.tb01756.x [ Links ]
Marsh, B.B., Woodhams, P.R. & Leet, N.G., 1966. Studies in meat tenderness. III. The effects of cold shortening on tenderness. J. Food Sci. 31, 450-459. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1966.tb00520.x [ Links ]
Marufu, M.,C., Qokweni, L. Chimonyo, M. & Dzama, K., 2011. Relationships between tick counts and coat characteristics in Nguni and Bonsmara cattle reared on semiarid rangelands in South Africa. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2, 172-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2011.07.001 [ Links ]
McCormick, R.J.,1994. The flexibility of the collagen compartment of muscle. Meat Sci. 36, 79. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(94)90035-3 [ Links ]
MacDougall, D. B., 1977. Colour in meat. In G. G. Birch, J. G. Brennan, & K. Parker (editors), Sensory properties of foods. Applied Science Publishers, London, England. [ Links ]
Mirkena T., Duguma G., Haile A., Tibbo, M., A.M. Okeyo, A.M., Wurzinger, M., Sölkner, J., 2010. Genetics of adaptation in domestic farm animals: A review. Livestock Sci. 132,1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.05.003 [ Links ]
Mokolobate, M.C., Scholtz, M.M. & Neser, F.W.C., 2019. Investigating novelty traits to improve cow-calf efficiency in South African Afrikaner, Angus and Charolais for climate-smart production. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 49, 605-611. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v49i4.1 [ Links ]
Mokolobate, M.C., Theunissen, A., Scholtz, M.M. & Neser, F.W.C., 2014. Sustainable crossbreeding systems of beef cattle in the era of climate change. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 44 (Supplement 1), S8-S11. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v44i5.2 [ Links ]
Nishimura, T., Hattori, A. & Takahashi, K., 1995. Structural weakening of intramuscular connective tissue during conditioning of beef. Meat Sci. 39, 127-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(95)80014-x [ Links ]
Olentine, C.G., Bradley, N.W., Boling, J.A. & Moody, W.G.,1976. Comparison of Charolais-crossbred and Angus yearling steers finished on pasture. J. Anim. Sci. 42, 1375-1380. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1976.4261375x [ Links ]
Place, S.E., Stackhouse, K.R., Wang, Q., & Mitloehner, F.M., 2011. Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from US beef and dairy production systems. In L. Guo, A.S. Gunasekara, & L. L. McConnell (eds). Understanding greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture management systems. Pp. 443-45. American Chemical Society. Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2011-1072.ch023 [ Links ]
Rhee, M.S., Wheeler, T.L., Shackelford, S D. & Khoomaraie, M., 2004. Variation in palatability and biochemical traits within and among eleven beef muscles. J. Anim. Sci. 82, 534-550. https://doi.org/10.1093/ansci/82.2.534 [ Links ]
Sagebiel, J.A., Krause, G.F., Sibbit, D., Langford, L., Comfort, J.E., Dyer, A.J. & Lasley, J.F., 1969. Dystocia in Reciprocally Crossed Angus, Hereford and Charolais Cattle, J. Anim. Sci. 29(2), 245-250. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1969.292245x [ Links ]
Scasta, D., Lalman, D.L. & Henderson, L., 2016. Drought mitigation for grazing operations: Matching the animal to the environment. Rangelands 38(4), 204-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rala.2016.06.006 [ Links ]
Scholtz, M.M., 1988. Selection possibilities for hardy beef breeds in Africa: The Nguni example. Proc. 3rd World Cong. Sheep and Beef Cattle Breed. 2, 303-319. [ Links ]
Scholtz, M.M. & Lombard, P.E., 1992. Prospects and potential of Southern African cattle breeds: The Nguni example. Proc. Aust. Assoc. Anim. Breed. Genet. 10, 47-50 http://www.aaabg.org/livestocklibrary/1992/ab92012.pdf [ Links ]
Scholtz, M.M. & Theunissen, A., 2010. The use of indigenous cattle in terminal cross-breeding to improve beef cattle production in Sub-Saharan Africa. Animal Genetic Resources 46, 33-39. DOI:10.1017/S2078633610000676 [ Links ]
Scholtz, M.M., Furstenburg, D., Maiwahse, A., Makgahlela, M.L., Theron, H.E. & Van der Westhuizen, J., 2010. Environmental-genotype responses in livestock to global warming: A Southern African perspective. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 40, 408-413. [ Links ]
Schutt, K.M., Burrow, H.M., Thompson J.M., & Bindon, B.M., 2009a. Brahman and Brahman crossbred cattle grown on pasture and in feedlots in subtropical and temperate Australia. 1. Carcass quality. Anim. Prod. Sci. 49, 426-438. https://doi.org/10.1071/ea08081 [ Links ]
Schutt, K.M., Burrow, H.M., Thompson J.M., & Bindon, B.M., 2009b. Brahman and Brahman crossbred cattle grown on pasture and in feedlots in subtropical and temperate Australia. 2. Meat quality and palatability. Anim. Prod. Sci. 49, 439-451. https://doi.org/10.1071/ea08082 [ Links ]
Shackelford, S.D., Morgan, J.B., Cross, H.R. & Savell, J.W., 1991. Identification of threshold levels for Warner-Bratzler shear force in beef top loin steaks. J. Muscle Foods 2, 289-296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4573.1991.tb00461.x [ Links ]
Snedecor, G.W. & Cochran, W.G., 1980. Statistical methods. 7th edition. Iowa State University Press. [ Links ]
Southgate, J.R., Cook, J.L. & Kempster, A.J.,1982. A comparison of the progeny of British Friesian dams and different sire breeds on 16- and 24-month beef production systems. 1. Live-weight gain and efficiency of feed utilization. Anim. Prod. 34, 155-166. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003356100000635 [ Links ]
Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Castel, V., Rosales, M., & de Haan, C., 2006. Livestock's long shadow. Environmental issues and options. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. http://www.fao.org/3/a-a0701e.pdf [ Links ]
Strydom, P.E., Naudé, R.T., Scholtz, M.M.& Van Wyk, J.B., 2000a. Characterization of indigenous cattle breeds in relation to carcass characteristics. Anim. Prod. 70, 241-252. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1357729800054709 [ Links ]
Strydom, P.E., Naudé, R.T., Scholtz, M.M. & Van Wyk, J.B., 2000b. Characterization of indigenous African cattle breeds in relation to meat quality characteristics. Meat Sci. 55, 79-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0309-1740(99)00128-x [ Links ]
Strydom, P.E., Frylinck, L., Van der Westhuizen, J., & Burrow, H.M., 2008. Growth performance, feed efficiency and carcass and meat quality of tropically adapted breed types from different farming systems in South Africa. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 48, 599-607. https://doi.org/10.1071/ea06057 [ Links ]
Troy, D.J. & Kerry, J., 2010. Consumer perception and the role of science in the meat industry. Meat Sci. 86, 214-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.05.009 [ Links ]
Valin, C., 1995. Animal and muscle variability in tenderisation: Possible causes. In: A. Ouali, D.I. Demeyer & F.J.M. Smulders (eds. Expression of tissue and regulation of protein degradation as related to meat quality. ECCEAMST, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Pp. 435-441. [ Links ]
Weber, R. 1973. The determination of hydroxyproline and chloride in meat and meat products: Simultaneous operation with nitrogen and phosphorus determinations. Technical Report 7, Technicon International Division SA, Geneva. [ Links ]
Submitted 2 October 2020
Accepted 2 October 2021
Published 9 May 2022
# Corresponding author: pestrydom@sun.ac.za