SHORT REPORT

 

Cultivating leaders for primary health care: A revised approach for transformative development

 

 

Klaus B. von Pressentin^I; Angela de Sá^{I, II}; Paddy Pampallis^III; Tasleem Ras^I

^IDepartment of Family, Community and Emergency Care, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
^IIDepartment of Health and Wellness, Western Cape Government, Cape Town, South Africa
^IIIIntegral Africa: The Coaching Centre, Cape Town, South Africa

Correspondence

 

 

---

ABSTRACT

Family physicians require leadership skills to strengthen team-based primary care services. Interviews with South African district managers confirmed the need to develop leadership skills in family physicians. The updated national programmatic learning outcomes for South African family physician training were published in 2021. They sparked the need for curriculum renewal at the University of Cape Town's Division of Family Medicine. A review of the leadership and governance module during registrar training showed that the sessions were perceived to be content heavy with insufficient opportunities for reflection. Following a series of stakeholder engagements, the module convenors co-designed a revised module that was blueprinted on the updated learning outcomes. The module incorporates a group coaching style, facilitating learning through reflection on one's experiences. The revised module was implemented in 2022. It aims to provide a transformative learning experience centred on students' perceptions of themselves as leaders, as well as professional identity formation and resilience building. This short report describes preliminary insights from the revised module's developmental phase and forms part of an ongoing iterative evaluation process.
CONTRIBUTION: Family physicians should lead across all their defined roles. Formal and informal learning opportunities are needed to facilitate their growth as leaders and help them to meet the health needs of communities served by an evolving health care system. This short report describes an example of a revised postgraduate module on leadership and governance, which may be of value to clinician educators and academic departments exploring innovative methods for the African region

Keywords: leadership; primary health care; family practice; education; medical; graduate; coaching.

---

 

 

Introduction

The political commitment to high-quality primary health care has been renewed several times over the past few decades, both globally and regionally.¹ South Africa shares this commitment and recognises the role of family physicians (FPs) as members of high-quality primary care teams in its national development plan.²

The recent pandemic's disruptive effect on society and health services is compounded by the rising burnout among health workers.^3,4 A renewed focus on self-awareness and caring for health workers adds to the growing awareness of the need to shift how health care teams and systems are managed at all levels.⁵ The notion of the complex adaptive system is supported by the need to establish a learning organisational culture and a values-based approach to leadership strategies.^6,7 These 'messy realities' are also manifested at the primary care level, and managers and leaders are grappling with the need for how best to support their teams to improve the quality of services with a shrinking budget in a changing health care landscape.⁸

Family physicians are seen as leaders of interventions to strengthen the district health system (DHS) within their sphere of influence via their teams. Previous research has demonstrated that FPs must develop essential leadership skills to influence their context.⁹ Interviews with district managers revealed that FPs lacking leadership skills or unable to integrate into their clinical teams were deemed 'at the mercy of the system'. Family physicians with leadership skills and qualities, resilience and the ability to be change agents were seen as able to shape their context. A consequent expectation of FPs in the DHS is that they will help the health care system to improve, expand and develop.¹⁰

The updated programmatic learning outcomes for training South African FPs were published in 2021.¹¹ These learning outcomes define the postgraduate specialist training of FPs across all nine programmes. Unit standard 1 of these learning outcomes describes the leadership and clinical governance skills and capabilities required of graduates.

 

The postgraduate programme at the University of Cape Town: A need for curriculum change

The University of Cape Town (UCT) Division of Family Medicine has engaged with these outcomes to revise the training of registrars in this domain. The Division offers postgraduate training at diploma, Masters (MMed) and doctoral levels. Formal training in leadership and governance has been part of the MMed programme for several years and was resumed in 2021 after a 1-year hiatus during the COVID-19 pandemic. At the end of 2021, as part of the annual review with staff and students, the need for curriculum change was identified to align with the updated national learning outcomes. The feedback from the 2021 student cohort demonstrated the need to provide more time for the sessions and opportunities for reflection on how the theory relates to practice, professional identity formation and building resilience.

 

A revised curriculum, revisiting educational principles and growing new partnerships in delivering the module

The module was revised in a participatory and engaging manner. A series of engagements with key stakeholders (students, facilitators and external stakeholders) were held at the start of 2022 to review and plan the revised module (content and delivery). We collaborated with a certified leadership coaching centre via one of our joint appointee academic staff members, A.d.S, who was trained via this centre as an accredited coach and joined K.v.P as co-convenor. The revised leadership and governance module was piloted in 2022 and has the following changes as informed by stakeholder engagement:

• The module content was blueprinted on the national programmatic learning outcomes in the domain of leadership and governance (Unit Standard 1), which encompasses sub-domains addressing developing self optimally as a leader, offering leadership within the DHS, leading clinical governance activities in the DHS and influencing DHS corporate governance.¹¹

• The module duration was expanded from seven sessions over 4 months in the second semester of year 3 of the MMed programme to 12 sessions spread over both semesters in year 3.

• To help participants discover their leadership personality profile, the Five Lenses Enneagram was employed. This tool explored emotional resilience, personal mastery, social drives (values, building on a developmental view), energy centres (head, heart and gut), and the Enneagram.¹² This was followed by an initial personal debrief with a certified coach focusing on the first three lenses, which in turn was followed by ongoing group reflections on habitual strategies and styles of being in the world.

• We incorporated a group coaching approach across the 12 sessions to help frame the learning content by linking it to the context of the students to facilitate the transferability of the learning.¹³ The coaching approach fosters self-discovery and uses inquiry to evoke awareness and insight. Here, the coach serves as a thought partner who uses deep questions and close listening to facilitate personal development to sustain change. The need for a positive, supportive process that recognises the difficulties presented by the context in which we work supported our decision to incorporate this coaching approach to enable participants to take a third-person perspective when viewing their roles from the individual and collective perspectives: how we show up and live out our internal drives, how we view and engage with our relationships and organisational culture spaces and how we interpret the manifestations of our explicit organisational system structure.

• The 12 sessions were organised across the unit standards, with four of the 12 sessions focusing on leadership development at the individual and team levels (unit standards 1.1 and 1.2) and the remaining eight sessions focusing on leadership and governance content presented by content experts (unit standards 1.3 - 1.5) followed by a facilitated reflection. The example in Table 1 demonstrates how the 90 min content session by a content expert is complemented by a 90 min facilitated reflection on learning by a coaching expert.

• We invited additional participants from our context to ensure the group size was between 8 and 10. Our third-year registrar cohort usually only consists of three to five students. These additional participants included recent postgraduate diploma graduates and early-career FPs working in the local setting. A mixed group experience was an opportunity to incorporate different experiences into the group coaching sessions.

 

 

Early feedback and navigating the transition: Looking back to plan forward

The class of 2022's reflections confirmed the module's value in facilitating self-awareness to ensure wellness and meaning making. The group size (eight participants) and mix of career stages and experiences were seen as valuable in providing a rich learning environment. The participants appreciated the role of the group coaching approach in facilitating learning at individual and collective levels. Some participants also experimented with using the coaching approach in their teams, enabling them to listen more intently and offer leadership to junior colleagues.

As a group of conveners, we will continue to develop this module in the spirit of co-creation by involving current students and recent graduates in the design and updating of the curriculum. We also include students in assisting the convenors in the curriculum evaluation. Growth as a leader beyond the module and programme is a desirable outcome, and we are actively engaged in managing transitions into new roles and contexts. This links well with the SAAFP Next5 initiative, which started in 2021 at a national level to support newly qualified family medicine specialists.¹⁴

 

Lessons learned that may assist regional training programmes in family medicine and primary care

Leadership training and practice in primary care have been dominated by the historic power relationship between the 'higher' levels of specialist care provided in secondary and tertiary levels of health care.^15,16 The dominant discourse is that of specialist care representing expert and superior care, which is a complete departure from the international commitment to primary health care, which has been shown to provide better health outcomes at lower costs to users and governments. The renewed commitment by the South African government to strengthen primary health care via the DHS requires specific educational interventions and leadership development programmes relevant to our setting.¹⁷ These clinician leaders and their teams face the realities represented by the confluence of the harsh realities of the social determinants of health and the discordant supply of human resources between the public and private sectors, the urban and rural context and the primary and specialist levels of care.¹⁸

The revised curriculum at the UCT allowed both students and facilitators to bring their lived experiences into the conversation during the group reflections facilitated by the coach. This module engaged participants in a learner-centred manner, allowing them to grow as self-aware clinical leaders capable of supporting transformation in primary care and health service teams. This adult learning style incorporates critical and social learning theories, which underpin reflection and professional identity formation.¹⁹ The coaching approach includes integral theory for understanding the full spectrum of human consciousness and development, providing a platform for vertical and horizontal leadership development.²⁰ We appreciate that being, becoming and growing as a leader is not simple. Box 1 expands on the interpretations of key terms typically associated with leadership practice and development, as shared by the coaching expert who collaborated in revising the module. Guiding conversations allow for transformative learning experiences by disrupting the status quo assessments of self and context. Each cohort can share their growth journey by developing stretch goals and shared accountability in the group.

 

 

Conclusion

We believe that the revised module contributes to a transformed curriculum, allowing for growth and leadership development. These changes also allow for deep and meaningful learning experiences to facilitate resilience and grow a community of learning and practice. The group coaching approach ensures a commitment to support each other, honour the privileged information shared during sessions and allow for a transformative learning experience in a safe environment. Our educational research will inform the MMed module delivery and the development of a planned short course aimed at leaders in primary care teams. We hope our experience may benefit the wider African region as we work together to identify contextually relevant educational strategies to develop future primary care leaders.

We as the authors would like to acknowledge the support from the division and departmental leadership team. We would also like to acknowledge the contribution of the students and recent graduates for their role in cocreating and shaping the revised module. We acknowledge the support of the UCT in awarding the team its Curriculum Change Grant 2023, which was used to deliver and evaluate the revised module.

 

References

1. World Health Organization. Declaration of Astana [homepage on the Internet]. World Health Organization; 2018 [cited 2023 Nov 14]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/WHO-HIS-SDS-2018.61        [ Links ]

2. National Planning Commission, Department: The Presidency. Chapter 10: Promoting health. In: National development plan 2030. 1st ed. Pretoria: Government of South Africa, 2013; p. 330-351.         [ Links ]

3. Robertson LJ, Maposa I, Somaroo H, Johnson O. Mental health of health care workers during the COVID-19 outbreak: A rapid scoping review to inform provincial guidelines in South Africa. S Afr Med J. 2020;110(10):1010-1019. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2020.v110i10.15022        [ Links ]

4. Griffin BJ, Weber MC, Hinkson KD, et al. Toward a dimensional contextual model of moral injury: A scoping review on health care workers. Curr Treat Options Psychiatry. 2023;10:199-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40501-023-00296-4        [ Links ]

5. Newton-Lewis T, Munar W, Chanturidze T. Performance management in complex adaptive systems: A conceptual framework for health systems. BMJ Global Health. 2021;6(7):e005582. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005582        [ Links ]

6. Greenhalgh T, Papoutsi C. Studying complexity in health services research: Desperately seeking an overdue paradigm shift. BMC Med. 2018;16(1):1-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1089-4        [ Links ]

7. Herbert CP. Perspectives in primary care: Values-driven leadership is essential in health care. Ann Fam Med. 2015;13(6):512-513. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1877        [ Links ]

8. Sturmberg JP, O'Halloran DM, Martin CM. Understanding health system reform - A complex adaptive systems perspective. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012;18(1):202-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01792.x        [ Links ]

9. Von Pressentin KB, Mash RJ, Baldwin-Ragaven L, Botha RP, Govender I, Steinberg WJ. The bird's-eye perspective: How do district health managers experience the impact of family physicians within the South African district health system? A qualitative study. S Afr Fam Pract. 2018;60(1):13-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/20786190.2017.1348047        [ Links ]

10. Mash R, Blitz J, Malan Z, Von Pressentin K. Leadership and governance: Learning outcomes and competencies required of the family physician in the district health system. S Afr Fam Pract. 2016;58(6):232-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/20786190.2016.1148338        [ Links ]

11. Mash R, Steinberg H, Naidoo M. Updated programmatic learning outcomes for the training of family physicians in South Africa. S Afr Fam Pract. 2021;63(3):a5342. https://doi.org/10.4102/safp.v63i1.5342        [ Links ]

12. Adam C. The 'why' & 'what' of the five lens?. Five lens people development [homepage on the Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Nov 14]. Available from: https://fivelens.co.za/the-why-what-of-the-five-lens/        [ Links ]

13. Kets De Vries MF. The group coaching conundrum. Int J Evid Based Coach Mentor. 2014;12(1):79-91.         [ Links ]

14. Van Der Bijl C, Nair A, Von Pressentin KB. Next5 - A new South African Academy of Family Physicians initiative ('You didn't come this far, to only come this far'). S Afr Fam Pract. 2021;63(4):a5405. https://doi.org/10.4102/safp.v63i1.5405        [ Links ]

15. Swanwick T, Varnam R. Leadership development and primary care [homepage on the Internet]. BMJ Leader. 2019 [cited 2023 Nov 14]. Available from: https://bmjleader.bmj.com/content/leader/early/2019/05/02/leader-2019-000145.full.pdf        [ Links ]

16. Muramoto M, Rankin P, Rodgers A. Leadership development for the future of family medicine: Training essential leaders for health care. Fam Med. 2021;53(7):650-653. https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2021.125016        [ Links ]

17. Johnson O, Begg K, Kelly AH, Sevdalis N. Interventions to strengthen the leadership capabilities of health professionals in Sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review. Health Policy Plann. 2021;36(1):117-133. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaa078        [ Links ]

18. Bai H. Focus: Medical education: Modernizing medical education through leadership development. Yale J Biol Med. 2020;93(3):433.         [ Links ]

19. Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Boudreau JD, Snell L, Steinert Y. A schematic representation of the professional identity formation and socialization of medical students and residents: A guide for medical educators. Acad Med. 2015;90(6):718-725. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000700        [ Links ]

20. Jakonen JP, Kamppinen M. Integral framework as a systemic foundation for coaching. Philos Coach Int J. 2018;3(2):27-43. https://doi.org/10.22316/poc/03.2.03        [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence:
Klaus von Pressentin
klaus.vonpressentin@uct.ac.za

Received: 14 Nov. 2023
Accepted: 26 Mar. 2024
Published: 22 Apr. 2024