SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.52 issue5Correlation between chemical composition, EHGE and TME of corn for ducksQuantitative sperm characteristics of Tankwa goats with special reference to hyperactivated motility author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

South African Journal of Animal Science

On-line version ISSN 2221-4062
Print version ISSN 0375-1589

S. Afr. j. anim. sci. vol.52 n.5 Pretoria  2022

http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v52i5.05 

Effect of functional oil in piglet feeding and its effects on total blood count, health parameters, and gastrointestinal tract structure

 

 

G. B. SantosI; J. L. GenovaII, #; A. S. LimaIII; A. C. OliveiraIV; L. B. AzevedoV; P. E. RupoloV; R. V. NunesV; N. T. E. OliveiraV; S. T. CarvalhoV; P. L. O. CarvalhoV

IAnimal Science Department, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, BA 40100-110, Brazil
IIAgricultural Science Center - Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine, Faculdade de Ensino Superior de São Miguel do Iguaçu Ltda/UNIGUAÇU, São Miguel do Iguaçu, PR 85877-000, Brazil
IIIAnimal Science Department, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, SE 49100-000, Brazil
IVAnimal Science Department, Campus de Ciências Agrárias da Faculdades Integradas UPIS, Brasília, DF 70390-125, Brazil
VAnimal Science Department, State University of Western Paraná, Marechal Cândido Rondon, PR 85960-000, Brazil

 

 


ABSTRACT

This study was performed to evaluate the effects of a functional oil blend (castor oil plus cashew nutshell oil) on complete blood count, health parameters, and intestinal structure in nursery pigs. A total of 128 crossbreed piglets (6.79 ± 1.76 kg of body weight) were allocated in a randomized complete block design with two dietary treatments: a functional oil-free diet or a diet based on added functional oil (1500 mg functional oil blend/kg of diet). Both diets had 400-500 mg colistin sulphate/kg. Pigs fed functional oil had higher erythrocytes and monocytes on days 11 and 23, respectively. Lymphocyte concentration was reduced, and ileum pH was increased in pigs fed functional oil on day 23. On day 37, lower jejunal pH was observed. However, no treatment effect on diarrhoea occurrence was observed. The lactic acid bacteria count was greater in jejunum and ileum of pigs fed functional oil on day 23. Pigs fed functional oil had more jejunal lesions on day 37. Based on the criteria of this study, dietary supplementation to piglets with functional oil blend changed the concentration of erythrocytes and monocytes as an important role in the defence of the organism; however, it showed a reduced capacity to modify the pH in small intestinal contents, which was reflected in an absence in the incidence of diarrhoea. In addition, piglets fed the functional oil blend had improvements in lactic acid bacterial counts, without the ability to attenuate lesions in the jejunum.

Keywords: erythrocyte, feed additive, intestinal lesion, intestinal microbiology, leukogram, weaned piglet


 

 

Introduction

The nursery phase is considered the most critical for piglets (Silva et al., 2012; Li et al., 2019). During nursery, piglets are intensively challenged by stress factors such as sow separation, new social hierarchy formation, and environmental and dietary changes (Clouard et al., 2012). This can lead to growth reduction and poor performance. In this transition period, reduced feed intake, high morbidity, and susceptibility to enteric infections are commonly observed probably due to digestive immaturity of pigs (Dong & Pluske, 2007; Windisch et al., 2008).

The gastrointestinal tract immaturity of piglets affects the intestinal architecture and compromises the absorption and secretion. This impairs intestinal health of piglets, favours pathogenic microorganisms proliferation (Oetting et al., 2006), and hence the occurrence of post-weaning diarrhoea (Vannucci & Guedes, 2009). Being responsible for a marked reduction in the health of pigs, post-weaning diarrhoea is a widespread problem that affects swine production in the whole world (Zhang et al., 2012). As a preventive measure, antibiotic therapy is still used as the main therapeutic resource against diarrhoea (Rossi et al., 2015). However, the emergence of regulations banning the use of growth-promoting antibiotics in animal feed (Mendel et al., 2017) has led to the search for natural additives to replace antimicrobials, either partially or totally.

Thus, in the last decade, phytogenic additives, especially functional oils have been studied relative to their effectiveness to replace antimicrobials (Purevjav et al., 2013; Jesus et al., 2016; Ghizzi et al., 2018; Torrent et al., 2019). In fact, the effectiveness of functional oils in different species has been reported in previous studies (Purevjav et al., 2013; Jesus et al., 2016; Ghizzi et al., 2018). Reports include a possible modulation effect on the intestinal mucosa (Murakami et al., 2014). However, research on nursery pigs fed functional oils is scarce. The antimicrobial effect of functional oils could be beneficial when added to feed of weaned pigs since they have immature immune systems in the gastrointestinal tract (Li et al., 2012).

Using phytogenic additives as antimicrobial alternatives in swine production is of scientific and industrial interest (Gois et al., 2016). Thus, the search for natural products that contribute to the health and effective gastrointestinal tract functioning of piglets is paramount in intensive pig farming. Functional oils are a promising alternative. However, their effectiveness in intestinal modulation and the prevention of enteric pathogens when associated with conventional antimicrobials needs to be proven.

Thus, this study was performed to evaluate the effects of a functional oil blend (castor oil plus cashew nutshell oil) on complete blood count, health parameters, and intestinal structure in nursery pigs.

 

Material and Methods

This study was carried out in the swine facility of Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (UNIOESTE) - located in Marechal Cândido Rondon - Brazil. All animal procedures were approved by the local Ethics Committee on the Use of Animals - CEUA (approval no. 09/2019).

A total of 128 crossbreed piglets (64 uncastrated males and 64 females, Landrace χ Large White, Agroceres χ DanBred) weaned at 21 d, with an initial body weight (BW) of 6.79 ± 1.76 kg were used. Pigs were allotted randomly based on initial body weight and gender to one of the two dietary treatments in a randomized complete block design (two batches over time) with 16 replicates and four animals per experimental unit. In the beginning of the experiment, animals were weighed, tagged for identification purposes, and housed in slatted plastic floor pens (1.54 m2) equipped with a semi-automatic feeder and nipple drinker. Pigs were allowed ad íibitum access to feed and water throughout the experimental period.

Dietary treatments included a functional oil-free (FOF) diet or a diet based on added functional oil (FO). The functional oil blend was a commercially available product (Essential®, Oligo Basics Agroind. Cascavel, Brazil) produced from castor oil and cashew nutshell oil and contained 200 g cardanol/kg, 90 g ricinoleic acid/kg, and 40 g cardol/kg. The experimental dose of Essential® (1500 mg/kg feed) was based on the manufacturer's recommendations. Throughout the experiment, pigs received three diets: 1) pre-starter I (from days 1-11), 2) pre-starter II (from days 12-23), and 3) starter (from days 24-37). Diets were composed of corn, soybean meal, and synthetic amino acids (Table 1) and were formulated to meet requirements for nursery pigs (Rostagno et al., 2017) (Table 1). All diets were offered as mash.

Two animals from each experimental unit were selected for blood collection based on the closest BW relative to the average BW in each pen. Blood samples (~10 mL) were withdrawn from jugular vein (08h00) using 0.7 χ 30 mm and 0.8 χ 30 mm needles. Samples were collected at the end of each experimental phase after an 8-h period of feed fasting. Blood samples were transferred to test tubes containing anticoagulant (EDTA) and then placed on ice inside a thermal box (4 °C).

Blood samples were sent to the lab of Veterinary Hospital of the Universidade Federal do Paraná for complete blood count. Circulating blood cells, red cells (erythrocytes, haemoglobin, haematocrit, mean corpuscular volume, and mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration), white cells (leucocytes, segmented neutrophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, and monocytes), and platelets were analysed using an automated haematology analyzer (BC-2800Vet, Mindray®, Shenzhen, China).

At the end of the pre-starter II (day 23) and starter (day 37) phases, piglets were weighed and fasted for 8 h before slaughter, followed by humane slaughter methods (electronarcosis with 240 volts for 3 s followed by exsanguination). Slaughtered animals had BW similar to the average of each treatment. Twenty-four pigs (12 per treatment) were slaughtered in each phase. Immediately after evisceration, the pH of the stomach and intestinal contents (jejunum, ileum, cecum, and colon) was measured using a portable pH meter (HI99163, Hanna Instruments, São Paulo, Brazil), as previously reported by Manzanilla et al. (2004).

Faeces were observed throughout the experiment to determine the effects of treatments on diarrhoea occurrence. Faeces were scored daily as preciously described by Oetting et al. (2006) on a 3-point scale (1 = solid faeces, 2 = soft faeces (pasty), and 3 = watery faeces). Faeces scored as 2 and 3 were declared diarrhoeal. Subsequently, the occurrence of diarrhoea was calculated as the proportion of diarrhoeal scores in each treatment throughout the experiment.

At the end of the pre-starter II (day 23) and starter (day 37) phases, pigs were weighed and then fasted for 8 h before slaughter. Slaughtered animals had BW similar to the average of each treatment. Twenty-four pigs (6 per treatment) were slaughtered in each phase. After evisceration, the intestinal mucosa (jejunum, ileum, cecum, and colon) was exposed with the aid of a sterile, disposable surgical blade. Intestinal content was sampled into sterile tubes and placed on ice inside a thermal box. Microbiological analyses were carried out in the microbiology lab of Unioeste.

Each sample of intestinal content (1 g) was added to a test tube containing 100 mL of sterile distilled water and stirred. Then, 1 mL of the solution was pipetted into a test tube containing 9 mL of sterile distilled water (10-1 dilution) and vortexed for 30 s. Further dilutions (10-5 to 10-7) were vortexed for 10 s. A 100 μL aliquot of each diluted sample was spread evenly on the surface of a sterile polystyrene Petri dish conducive to lactic acid bacterial (LAB) growth with the aid of a Drigalski loop. To evaluate LAB, diluted samples were spread evenly on the surface of agar (Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe; MRS) and incubated upside-down (CO2 incubator) at 35 °C for 48 h. After the incubation period, bacterial colonies were counted using a colony counter (J-3 automatic digital colony counter, Global Trade Technology, São Paulo, Brazil). Results were log-transformed, as previously described by Silva et al. (2017).

Samples (3 cm) of small intestine (duodenum, jejunum, and ileum) were collected and then washed with saline solution (0.9%) and fixed in buffered formalin (10%) for histological slide preparation. Histological analyses were performed at the non-ruminant research lab of Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Brazil. Samples were inserted into individual histological cassettes, embedded in paraffin, and cut using a microtome (RM2125 RTS, Leica Biosystems, São Paulo, Brazil), as described by Gao et al. (2000). Slides were made for two replicates per sample (with no serial cuts) and then stained with haematoxylin and eosin.

Intestinal lesions were scored to compare possible histological alterations. Each lesion was scored by multiplying its severity by the extent, as previously reported by Kolf-Clauw et al. (2009). Lesion severity was scored as follows: 1 = mild lesion, 2 = moderate lesion, and 3 = severe lesion. Lesion extent was scored as follows: 0 = no lesion, 1 = low (<25% of intestine section with lesions); 2 = moderate (26% to 50% of intestine section with lesions), and 3 = high (>50% of intestine section with lesions) (Table 2). The final score was obtained by summing the lesion scores.

Prior to variance (ANOVA) or covariance (ANCOVA) analyses, residual error was evaluated for outliers using the Student residue (Rstudent) test. Rstudent values > 3 SD (standard errors) were considered as significant. The normality of experimental errors and the homogeneity of variances between treatments for the different variables were previously evaluated using Shapiro-Wilk and Levene tests, respectively. Data on blood parameters were analysed using the following model:

where Yjk = the dependent variable in each plot, measured in the i-th class of diet, j-th block, and in the k-th replication; m = overall mean; T = effect of treatment classes (i = 1-2); bj = effect of blocks (j = 1-2); β = regression coefficient of Y over X; Xjk = average observation of the covariate (baseline of blood) in each plot, measured in the i-th treatment class, j-th block, and in the k-th replication; X = overall average for the covariate X and sijk = random error of the plot associated with each Yjk observation.

Data on gastrointestinal tract and intestinal microbiology were analysed using the above-mentioned model without the covariate effect.

For data on diarrhoea occurrence (DO), the generalized linear model was adjusted using binomial distribution and a logit function:

where: μ = overall mean; T = effect of treatment (i = 1-2); and bj = effect of block (j = 1-2).

Treatment effects were tested via type III analysis. Data on DO were expressed as percentage. Treatment effects were analysed via ANCOVA or ANCOVA using the Fisher criterion. Statistical analyzes were performed using the general linear models procedure of SAS, University Edition (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC, USA). All normally distributed data were presented as means with standard error of the mean.

 

Results and Discussion

Pigs fed FO had higher erythrocytes (P =0.023) and monocytes (P =0.023) on day 11 and day 23, respectively (Table 3 and 4). A lower lymphocyte concentration (P =0.035) on day 23 was observed in pigs fed FO.

The erythrogram consisted of counting erythrocytes (red blood cells). The higher erythrocyte concentration on piglets fed FO on day 11 was within the reference range for pigs, according to Weiss & Wardrop (2010). Similar results were observed by Yan et al. (2012) and Czech et al. (2009), who reported a significant increase in erythrocyte concentration in pigs fed phytogenic additives, also within the species reference range.

Platelets are blood cells responsible for clotting. In the present study, platelet concentration was kept within the reference range (100 to 900 thousand/mm3) for pigs (Weiss & Wardrop, 2010) in all studied phases. Henn et al. (2010) also did not observe differences in blood platelet concentration in pigs fed dietary phytogenic additives (473 thousand/mm3), which also remained within the reference range during the experimental period.

However, in other studies (Henn et al., 2010; Yan et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2012), dietary phytogenic additives did not affect erythrogram and platelet count in pigs. Throughout the experimental period, the erythrogram and platelet count remained within the reference range for pigs. This suggests the absence of anaemia and haemorrhages in the pigs.

The leukogram is the analysis of blood cells responsible for body defence. An increased monocyte concentration was observed in pigs fed FO on day 23 and values remained within the reference range (2 to 10%) for pigs (Weiss & Wardrop, 2010). However, in a study conducted by Henn et al. (2010), a dietary phytogenic additive did not affect monocyte concentration since it is altered in cases of viral or bacterial infections.

The lower lymphocyte concentration we observed in pigs fed FO on day 23 suggests a reduced ability to mobilize lymphocytes or a lower necessity of using immune defence mechanisms. However, values remained within the reference range (39-62%) for pigs (Weiss & Wardrop, 2010). Another point worthy of mention is that, despite not being affected, leukocyte concentration was above the reference range (11000 and 1200 cells/mm3) for pigs (Weiss & Wardrop, 2010) in all studied phases in the present study. Similar results were reported in other studies (Henn et al., 2010; Yan et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2012) when dietary phytogenic additives were offered to pigs. The observed leukocytosis may have been a response of the immune system due to intestinal pathologies or be related to the immune activity of the functional oil blend. However, we cannot fully state the effects of FO on the immune response in pigs.

Higher (Ρ =0.019) ileum content pH on day 23 and lower (P =0.008) jejunum content pH on day 37 were observed in pigs fed FO (Table 5).

Weaned piglets have a high gastric pH (ranging from 4 to 5) and it is affected by age and dietary changes (Brumano & Gattás, 2009). The values of stomach pH we observed, although not significant, were not optimal for pepsin activity (should range from 2-4; Rerat & Corring, 1991). Weaned piglets have low capacity to produce HCl (Brumano & Gattás, 2009), and hence to reduce stomach pH, which was observed in the present study.

Despite being significant, ileum and jejunum pH values observed on day 23 and day 37 were below the optimal range for trypsin and chymotrypsin activity (7.8 to 8.1); these are pancreatic enzymes responsible for protein digestion in the small intestine (Makkink et al., 1994).

The dietary functional oil blend did not favour gastrointestinal content pH in the pigs, although a significant increase in jejunum and ileum LAB count was observed. Our findings may be explained by factors such as fasting time, amount of gastrointestinal content, and waiting period for pH measurement. It is possible that dietary buffering capacity prevented critical changes in pH (Costa et al., 2011). There was no effect (P >0.1) of treatments on the occurrence of diarrhoea (Table 6).

This suggests that the dietary functional oil blend was not able to reduce the occurrence of diarrhoea in the pigs. This is supported by the results reported by Li et al. (2006) and Li et al. (2011). These authors observed no reduction in the occurrence of diarrhoea in pigs fed diets containing phytogenic additives. However, different results were observed by Oetting et al. (2006) and Silva et al. (2012), who reported a lower occurrence of diarrhoea in pigs fed dietary phytogenic additives. Post-weaning period is a stressful phase for piglets. During this phase, different factors, especially dietary change, can contribute to diarrhoea occurrence. Dietary transition causes morphophysiological changes in the gastrointestinal tract. This makes piglets more susceptible to diarrhoea caused by intestinal pathogens. The non-effectiveness of the functional oil blend to reduce diarrhoea in pigs may be related to its stability in the diet and gastrointestinal tract, the dietary dose, and the health challenge the pigs were subjected to. The LAB count was higher in jejunum (P =0.05) and ileum (P =0.041) of piglets fed FO on day 23 (Table 7).

Microorganisms are not randomly distributed in the intestine of animals. The different species and population density are established according to specific traits of gastrointestinal tract segments (Mackie et al., 1999). The singularity of the gastrointestinal tract is due to changes in pH, the presence of digestive enzymes, and bile salts which create "microenvironments" that are suitable for a range of microorganisms (Pedroso et al., 2005). In general, diets supplemented with phytogenic additives can positively affect intestinal microbial balance of pigs by favouring LAB colonization and reducing pathogenic bacteria (Zhu et al., 2000). This was observed in the present study.

In pre-starter phases I and II, the dietary functional oil blend contributed to intestinal microbial balance and favoured the development of LAB in jejunum and ileum. Distal segments of small intestine have the greatest microbial diversity (Mackie et al., 1999). Similar results were observed by Li et al. (2012), who reported lower enterobacteria counts and higher LAB in the faeces of piglets fed dietary essential oils.

However, Gois et al. (2016) and Li et al. (2012) did not observe changes in the total bacterial count, enterobacteria, and LAB in the intestinal content of pigs fed dietary essential oils. The gastrointestinal tract is fully developed and has better digestive efficiency in starter piglets. This reduces the amount of feed residues that could favour pathogenic microorganism development. Functional oils aid gastric secretion and pepsin activation and increase pancreatic juice production and digestive enzymes (Costa et al., 2011).

Although the observed intestinal lesion score results suggest mild lesions, pigs fed FO had an increase (P =0.001) in jejunum lesions after 37 d on dietary treatment (Table 8).

The integrity of the intestinal epithelium is indicative of intestinal health (Xiong et al., 2015). The gastrointestinal mucosa serves as a dynamic barrier that regulates nutrient and water absorption and excludes potential pathogens. In the nursery pre-starter phase, the gastrointestinal tract of piglets is not fully developed and it is easily modified by environmental stimuli. Changes compromise the barrier function and hence cause intestinal inflammation (Wijtten et al., 2011). The jejunum is the small intestine segment with the highest concentration of microorganisms (Mackie et al., 1999). Therefore, the jejunum is the intestinal segment most prone to lesions. Undigested feed residues favour the adherence of pathogenic bacteria to the intestinal mucosa of piglets, which are more resistant to the antimicrobial action of the functional oil; however, this fact was not demonstrated in the present study. However, the intestinal lesion score can be evidenced in situations of local acidification when functional oils do not modulate intestinal pH. Other factors such as infection, desquamation, association with antibiotics, and mucus production can also be relevant.

 

Conclusions

Dietary supplementation of piglets with a functional oil blend (castor oil plus cashew nutshell oil) changed the concentration of red blood cells and monocytes, with an important role in the defence of the organism. However, they showed a reduced capacity to modify the pH in small intestinal contents, which was reflected in an absence of influence on the incidence of diarrhoea. In addition, piglets fed the functional oil blend had improvements in LAB counts, but with higher jejunum lesion scores due to the reduced pH in this intestinal segment.

 

Acknowledgements

We thank the Cooperative Copagril for supplying the animals and ingredients. We thank the company for supplying the additive tested and funding the research.

 

Authors' Contributions

All the authors contributed equally and commented on the early and final version of the manuscript.

 

Conflict of Interest Declaration

There are no conflicts of interest.

 

References

Brumano, G. & Gattás, G., 2009. Alternativas ao uso de antibióticos como promotores de crescimento em rações de aves e suínos. Nutritime 6, 856-875. (in Portugese, English abstract).         [ Links ]

Clouard, C., Meunier-Salaüna, M.C. & Val-Laillet, D., 2012. The effects of sensory functional ingredients on food preferences, intake and weight gain in juvenile pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 138, 36-46. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2012.01.016.         [ Links ]

Costa, L.B., Berenchtein, B., Almeida, V.V., Tse, M.L.P., Braz, D.B., Andrade, C., Mourão, G.B. & Miyada, V.S., 2011. Aditivos fitogênicos e butirato de sódio como alternativas aos antibióticos para leitões desmamados. Arch. Zootec. 60, 733-744. doi: 10.4321/S0004-05922011000300061.         [ Links ]

Czech, A., Kowalczuk, E. & Grela, E.R., 2009. The effect of an herbal extract used in pig fattening on the animals performance and blood components. Annales UMCS 27, 25-33. doi: 10.2478/v10083-009-0009-7.         [ Links ]

Dong, G.Z. & Pluske, J.R., 2007. The low feed intake in newly-weaned pigs: Problems and possible solutions. Asian- Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 20, 3, 440-452. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2007.440.         [ Links ]

Gao, C., Zhao, J. & Gregersen, H., 2000. Histomorphometry and strain distribution in pig duodenum with reference to zero- stress state. Dig. Dis. Sci. 45, 1500-1508. doi: 0.1023/A:1005592306587.         [ Links ]

Ghizzi, L.G., Del Valle, T.A., Takiya, C.S., Silva, G.G., Zilio, E.M.C., Scognamiglio, N.T., Martello, L.S. & Rennó, F.P., 2018. Effects of functional oils on ruminal fermentation, rectal temperature, and performance of dairy cows under a high temperature humidity index environment. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 246, 158-166. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.10.009.         [ Links ]

Gois, F.D., Cairo, P.L.G., Cantarelli, V.S., Costa, L.C.B., Fontana, R., Allaman, I.B., Sbardella, M., Carvalho Junior, F.M. & Costa, L.B., 2016. Effect of Brazilian red pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius Raddi) essential oil on performance, diarrhoea, and gut health of weanling pigs. Livest. Sci.183, 24-27. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2015.11.009.         [ Links ]

Henn, J.D., Bertol, T.M., Moura, N.F., Coldebella, A., Brum, P.A.R. & Casagrande, M., 2010. Oregano essential oil as food additive for piglets: Antimicrobial and antioxidant potential. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 39, 1761-1767. doi: 0.1590/S1516-35982010000800019.         [ Links ]

Jesus, E.F., Del Valle, T.A., Calomeni, G.D., Silva, T.H., Takiya, C.S., Vendramini, T.H.A., Paiva, P.G., Silva, G.G., Netto, A.S. & Rennó, F.P., 2016. Influence of a blend of functional oils or monensin on nutrient intake and digestibility, ruminal fermentation, and milk production of dairy cows. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 219, 59-67. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.06.003.         [ Links ]

Kolf-Clauw, M., Castellote, J., Joly, B., Bourges-abella, N., Raymond-Letron, I., Pinton, P. & Oswald, I.P., 2009. Development of a pig jejunal explant culture for studying the gastrointestinal toxicity of the mycotoxin deoxynivalenol: Histopathological analysis. Toxicol. In Vitro 23, 1580-1584. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2009.07.015.         [ Links ]

Li, Y., Hou, S., Chen, J., Peng, W., Wen, W., Chen, F. & Huang, X., 2019. Oral administration of Lactobacillus delbrueckii during the suckling period improves intestinal integrity after weaning in piglets. J. Funct. Foods. 63: 103591. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2019.103591.         [ Links ]

Li, S.Y., Ru, Y.J., Liu, M., Xu, B., Péron, A. & Shi, X.G., 2012. The effect of essential oils on performance, immunity, and gut microbial population in weaner pigs. Livest. Sci. 145, 119-123. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2012.01.005.         [ Links ]

Mackie, R.I., Sghir, A. & Gaskins, H.R., 1999. Developmental microbial ecology of the neonatal gastrointestinal tract. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 69,1035S-1045S. doi: 10.1093/ ajcn/69.5.1035s.         [ Links ]

Makkink, C.A., Berntsen, P.J.M. & Kamp, B.M.L., 1994. Gastric protein breakdown and pancreatic enzyme activities in response to two different dietary protein sources in newly weaned pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 72, 2843-2850. doi: 10.2527/1994.72112843x.         [ Links ]

Manzanilla, E.G., Perez, J.F., Martin, M., Kamel, C., Baucells, F. & Gasa, J., 2004. Effect of plant extracts and formic acid on the intestinal equilibrium of early-weaned pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 82, 3210-3218. doi: 10.2527/2004.82113210x.         [ Links ]

Mendel, M., Chtopecka, M., Dziekan, N. & Karlik, W., 2017. Phytogenic feed additives as potential gut contractility modiflers-a review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 230, 30-46. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.05.008.         [ Links ]

Murakami, A.E, Eyng, C. & Torrent, J., 2014. Effects of functional oils on coccidiosis and apparent metabolizable energy in broiler chickens. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 27, 981-989. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2013.13449.         [ Links ]

Oetting, L.L., Utiyama, C.E., Giani, P.A., Ruiz, U.S.R. & Miyada, V.S., 2006. Efeitos de extratos vegetais e antimicrobianos sobre a digestibilidade aparente, o desempenho, a morfometria dos órgãos e a histologia intestinal de leitões recém-desmamados. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 35, 1389-1397. doi: 10.1590/S1516-35982006000500019.         [ Links ]

Pedroso, A.A., Oetting, L.L., Utiyama, C.E., Menten, J.F.M., Lambais, M.R. & Miyada, V.S., 2005. Variabilidade espacial da comunidade bacteriana intestinal de suínos suplementados com antibióticos ou extratos herbais. R. Bras. Zootec. 34, 1225-1233. doi: 10.1590/S1516-35982005000400018. (in Portugese, English abstract).         [ Links ]

Purevjav, T., Hoffman, M.P., Ishdorj, A., Conover, A.J., Jedlicka, M.E., Prusa, K., Torrent, J. & Pusillo, G.M., 2013. Effects of functional oils and monensin on cattle finishing programs. Prof. Anim. Sci. 29, 426-434. DOI: 10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30256-4.         [ Links ]

Rerat, A. & Corring, T., 1991. Animal factors affecting protein digestion and absorption. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Digestive Physiology in Pigs. Ed: Verstegen, M.W.A., Huisman, J. & Den Hartog, L.A., EAAP Publications, Wageningen, Netherlands. pp. 5.         [ Links ]

Rossi, C.A., Soares, M., Luchese, F.C. & Santurio, J.M., 2015. Uso de óleos essenciais no controle dos sinais clínicos das diarreias neonatais em leitões nascidos de fêmeas com diferentes ordens de parto. Cienc. Anim. Bras. 16, 93-102. doi: 10.1590/1089-6891v16i119669. (in Portugese, English abstract).         [ Links ]

Rostagno, H.S., Albino, L.F.T., Hannas, M.I., Donzele, J.L., Sakomura, N.K., Perazzo, F.G., Saraiva, A., Teixeira, M.L., Rodrigues, P.B., Oliveira, R.F., Barreto, S.L.T. & Brito, C.O., 2017. Tabelas brasileiras para aves e suínos: composição de alimentos e exigências nutricionais (4th ed.), Volume 1. Ed. UFV, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil. (in Portugese).         [ Links ]

Silva, N., Junqueira, V.C A., Silveira, N.F.A., Taniwaki, M.H., Gomes, R.A.R. & Okazaki, M.M., 2017. Manual de métodos de análise microbiológica de alimentos (5th ed.), Volume 1. Ed. Blucher, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. (in Portugese).         [ Links ]

Silva, T.R.G., Martins, T.D.D., Silva, J.H.V., Silva, L.P.G., Pascoal, L.A.F, Oliveira, E.R.A. & Brito, M.S., 2012. Inclusão de óleos essenciais como elementos fitoterápicos na dieta de suínos. Rev. Bras. Saúde Prod. Anim. 13, 181-191. (in Portugese, English abstract).         [ Links ]

Torrent, J., Menocal, J.A., Coello, C.L. & González, E.A., 2019. Effects of functional oils on performance and carcass characteristics of broilers under two different temperature environments. Poult. Sci. J. 98, 5855-5861. doi:10.3382/ps/pez235.         [ Links ]

Utiyama, C.E., Oetting, L.L., Giani, P.A., Ruiz, U.S. & Miyada, V.S., 2006. Efeitos de antimicrobianos, prebióticos, probióticos e extratos vegetais sobre a microbiota intestinal, a frequência de diarreia e o desempenho de leitões recém-desmamados. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 35, 2359-2367. doi: 10.1590/S1516-35982006000800023. (in Portugese, English abstract).         [ Links ]

Vannucci, F.A. & Guedes, R.M.C., 2009. Fisiopatologia das diarreias em suínos. Ciênc. Rural, 39, 2233-2242. (in Portugese, English abstract).         [ Links ]

Xiong, X., Yang, H.S., Wamg, X.C., Hu, Q., Liu, C.X., Wu, X., Deng, D., Hou, Y.Q., Nyachoti, C. M. & Xiao, D.F., 2015. Effect of low dosage of chito-oligosaccharide supplementation on intestinal morphology, immune response, antioxidant capacity, and barrier function in weaned piglets. J. Anim. Sci. 93, 1089-1097. doi: 10.2527 / jas.2014-7851.         [ Links ]

Yan, L., Meng, Q. W. & Kim, I.H., 2011. The effect of an herb extract mixture on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics, and fecal noxious gas content in growing pigs. Livest. Sci. 141, 143-147. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2011.05.011.         [ Links ]

Yan, L., Meng, Q.W. & Kim, I.H., 2012. Effect of an herb extract mixture on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics, and fecal microbial shedding in weanling pigs. Livest. Sci. 145(suppl_1-3), 189-195. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2012.02.001.         [ Links ]

Weiss, D.J. & Wardrop, K.J., 2010. Schalm's Veterinary Hematology (6th ed.), Volume 1. Ed. Wiley-Blackwell, Ames, Lowa, USA.         [ Links ]

Wijtten P.J.A., Van Der Meulen, J. & Verstegen, M.W.A., 2011. Intestinal barrier function and absorption in pigs after weaning: A review. Br. J. Nutr. 105, 967-981. doi: 10.1017/S0007114510005660.         [ Links ]

Windisch, W.M., Schedle, K., Plitzner, C. & Kroismayr, A., 2008. Use of phytogenic products as feed additives for swine and poultry. J. Anim. Sci. (14 suppl), E140-8. doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0459.         [ Links ]

Zhang, S., Jung, J.H., Kim, H.S., Kim, B.Y. & Kim, I.H., 2012. Influences of phytoncide supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood profiles, diarrhoea scores, and fecal microflora shedding in weaning pigs. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 25, 1309-1315. doi: 10.5713 / ajas.2012.12170.         [ Links ]

Zhu, W.Y., Williams, B.A., Akkermans, A. & Tamminga, S., 2000. Development of the microbial community in weaning piglets. In: 2nd INRA-RRI Symposium on The Challenges for Microbial Digestive Ecology at the Third millennium. Ed: Bernalier, A., Flint, H., Fonty, G., Forano, E., Jouany, J.P., Martin, C., Michalet-Doreau, B., Newbold, J., Scott, K. & Wallace, J., INRA-RRI, Clermont-Ferrand, France. pp. 180.         [ Links ]

 

 

Submitted 14 January 2022
Accepted 8 May 2022
Published 28 January 2023

 

 

# Corresponding author: jansllerg@gmail.com