SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.33 issue1Understanding the influence of 24-hour movement behaviours on the health and development of preschool children from low-income South African settings: the SUNRISE pilot studyObjective sleep patterns and validity of self-reported sleep monitoring across different playing levels in rugby union author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


South African Journal of Sports Medicine

On-line version ISSN 2078-516X
Print version ISSN 1015-5163

Abstract

KEMLER, E; CORNELISSEN, MH  and  GOUTTEBARGE, V. The effectiveness of an online intervention in stimulating injury-preventive behaviour in adult novice runners: Results of a randomised controlled trial. SA J. Sports Med. [online]. 2021, vol.33, n.1, pp.1-9. ISSN 2078-516X.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2078-516x/2021/v33i1a11297.

BACKGROUND: The online intervention Runfitcheck was developed to stimulate injury-preventive behaviour among adult novice runners OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the effectiveness of Runfitcheck on injury-preventive behaviour among adult novice runners METHODS: A randomised controlled trial was conducted among adult novice runners. The intervention group had access to the Runfitcheck intervention, the control group performed their running activities as usual. One, three, and five months after enrolment, participants reported retrospectively what they had done regarding injury-preventive behaviour (operationalised as (i) using a (personalised) training schedule; (ii) performing strength and technique exercises; and (iii) performing a warm-up routine prior to running). Relative Risks (RR) and 95% Confidence Interval (95%CI) were used to analyse behavioural change. RESULTS: The intervention group (n=715) searched more often for information about a warm-up routine (RR 1.211; 95%CI 1.0801.357), and added more often strength exercises to their warm-up routine (RR 1.228; 95%CI 1.092-1.380). The intervention group performed more often running technique exercises compared to the control group (n=696) (RR 1.134; 95%CI 1.015-1.267), but less often strength exercises (RR 0.865 (95%CI 0.752-0.995). Within the group of runners that did not perform any warm-up routine at enrolment (n=272), the intervention group started to perform a regular warm-up routine more often than the control group (RR 1.461; 95%CI 1.084-1.968). No significant results were found for using a training schedule. CONCLUSION: The online intervention Runfitcheck was effective in stimulating aspects of injury-preventive behaviour in adult novice runners, mostly related to a warm-up routine. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NL6225, Registered April 24th 2007 - Retrospectively registered, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/6225

Keywords : behaviour; running; primary prevention; tailor-made; intervention.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License