SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.24 issue1When rain clouds gather: Digital curation of South African public records in the cloudA review of knowledge transfer tools in knowledge-intensive organisations author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

    Related links

    • On index processCited by Google
    • On index processSimilars in Google

    Share


    South African Journal of Information Management

    On-line version ISSN 1560-683XPrint version ISSN 2078-1865

    Abstract

    MANGUNDU, John. Higher education institutional innovation: An analysis of challenges to e-academic advising during emergency remote teaching. SAJIM (Online) [online]. 2022, vol.24, n.1, pp.1-9. ISSN 1560-683X.  https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v24i1.1569.

    BACKGROUND: The sudden shift by higher education institutions (HEIs) to emergency remote teaching (ERT), driven by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, pushed academic advisors of HEIs to suddenly shift towards e-academic advising to continue with the provision of academic advisory support services. However, few studies have concentrated on e-academic advising innovation challenges in the context of developing countries. OBJECTIVES: Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine students' challenges in the innovative e-academic advising during ERT in a HEI in South Africa. METHOD: The study employed an online survey method and a stratified random sampling technique to select 240 first-year university undergraduate students from six faculties for the study. Structural equation modelling (SEM) with post hoc analysis, Bonferroni correlation, factor analysis with promax rotation and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy were employed in analysing the collected data. RESULTS: The findings revealed significantly correlated institutional, technological and personal challenges to e-academic advising. Despite e-academic advising challenges being experienced differently across faculties, findings revealed that students experienced personal challenges more than institutional and technological challenges. CONCLUSION: Personal challenges are the most important factors for consideration when innovating to e-academic advising. The study concludes that the management of the HEI studied could improve the success of its innovation of integrating e-academic advising solutions to its academic affairs by considering a holistic approach that recognises the multifaceted challenges identified. CONTRIBUTION: The study contributes to the discussion on student success in online learning environments. Once the challenges are identified, measures can be put in place to address them.

    Keywords : e-academic advising; innovation; first-year students; challenges; higher education institution; emergency remote teaching.

            · text in English     · English ( pdf )