SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.28Experiences and mentoring needs of novice nurse educators at a public nursing college in the Eastern CapeA model to facilitate self-management of human immunodeficiency virus in students within a university setting and promoting their mental health author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Health SA Gesondheid (Online)

On-line version ISSN 2071-9736
Print version ISSN 1025-9848

Abstract

CHETTY, Ashley; GUSE, Tharina  and  MALEMA, Mosa. Integrated vs non-integrated treatment outcomes in dual diagnosis disorders: A systematic review. Health SA Gesondheid (Online) [online]. 2023, vol.28, pp.1-10. ISSN 2071-9736.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v28i0.2094.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of dual diagnosis (DD) (i.e. substance use disorders [SUD] and co-occurring mental disorders) is widespread; however, they vary widely in permutation and combination. As a result, establishing effective and empirically supported interventions for this clinical population remains challenging. AIM: This study aimed to examine current literature on the treatment outcomes for patients with DD. METHOD: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2009 and 2018 was conducted for two broad intervention categories identified by the literature: non-integrated and integrated treatment. Multiple electronic databases were searched using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA). RESULTS: The search generated a total of 743 studies, of which 11 satisfied the inclusion criteria. These studies were thematically synthesised into two main analytical themes: 'treatment outcomes' and 'reported strengths and limitations of DD treatment'. Specifically, integrated treatment held an advantage over non-integrated treatment in significantly improving psychiatric symptomatology. However, no significant benefits were found between integrated and non-integrated treatment regarding substance misuse and treatment retention CONCLUSION: Overall, the results provided insufficient evidence to support the enhanced efficacy of integrated or non-integrated treatment over the other in treating patients with DD. CONTRIBUTION: The study's findings were used to provide recommendations to inform the clinical psychological service delivery of dual diagnosis treatment in South Africa and also to identify gaps in the literature and highlight areas for future research.

Keywords : dual diagnosis; mental disorders; substance use disorder; alcohol dependence; integrated treatment; non-integrated treatment; service delivery; randomised controlled trials; systematic review.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License