SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.25The implications of the Public Protector's remedial action directing the exercise of discretionary constitutional powers: separation of powers implications author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Law, Democracy and Development

On-line version ISSN 2077-4907
Print version ISSN 1028-1053

Abstract

NKOANE, Paul. Deciding non-constitutional matters of general public importance in South African law: can constitutional values be used?. Law democr. Dev. [online]. 2021, vol.25, pp.604-631. ISSN 2077-4907.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2077-4907/2021/ldd.v25.21.

The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 is supreme. It can be used to assess the soundness of various policies and laws. This statement has however been challenged based on the apparent limited range of the provisions of the Constitution. The Bill of Rights enshrined in the Constitution comprises of dedicated rules intended to address certain issues. Owing to this supposed limitation, some have questioned the tag of supremacy attached to the Constitution. The article examines how the Constitutional Court has decided issues which did not raise clear constitutional questions to determine whether values could be used to decide various issues of law. This determination, similarly, informs whether constitutional values could be used to administer matters of general public importance that are not founded on clear constitutional questions.

Keywords : Constitutional Court; constitutional values; matters of public importance; public policy; the common good.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License