SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.47 número1If the Colour of Jesus Is not an Issue, why Are you so Incensed at the Suggestion that Jesus Is Black?Controversial Contradictions in Testimonies about Manche Masemola: The Challenge of Variability in Oral History índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Studia Historiae Ecclesiasticae

versión On-line ISSN 2412-4265
versión impresa ISSN 1017-0499

Resumen

EASTMAN, David L. The Apocryphal Paul as Divided Martyr: The Rhetoric of Schism and Legitimacy in Early Christian North Africa. Studia Hist. Ecc. [online]. 2021, vol.47, n.1, pp.1-18. ISSN 2412-4265.  http://dx.doi.org/10.25159/2412-4265/8933.

Neither the epistles of Paul (authentic or disputed) nor the Acts of the Apostles address the death of the apostle, but this is a focus in the later apocryphal acts. This article examines the importance of this image of Paul as a martyr for the development of early Christianity in North Africa. Evidence from Tertullian, from texts describing the death of Cyprian of Carthage, and from the writings of Augustine, demonstrates that Paul was the model martyr for the African church. Paul's status as such became a major point of contention in the competing claims to authority and legitimacy during the Donatist Controversy. The article analyses rhetorical claims to the Pauline legacy from the Caecilianist side (the writings of Optatus of Milev and Augustine) and the Donatist side (a mosaic from Uppenna and the Acts of the Abitinian Martyrs). Each side claimed that their martyrs were the true successors of Paul, and therefore they were the true Christians in Africa.

Palabras clave : Apostle Paul; martyrdom; Donatist Controversy; Tertullian; Augustine; Optatus; apocryphal acts; Cyprian.

        · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons