SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.27 número1Breast imaging at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital: A clinically relevant auditTuberculosis, a great masquerader: A case series unveiling rare sites of musculoskeletal involvement through imaging índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


SA Journal of Radiology

versión On-line ISSN 2078-6778
versión impresa ISSN 1027-202X

Resumen

DE MAN, Leoni; WENTZEL, Mari; VAN ROOYEN, Cornel  y  TURTON, Edwin. Comparison between ultrasound and chest X-ray to confirm central venous catheter tip position. S. Afr. J. radiol. (Online) [online]. 2023, vol.27, n.1, pp.1-8. ISSN 2078-6778.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v27i1.2587.

BACKGROUND: Mechanical central venous catheter (CVC) placement complications are mostly malposition or iatrogenic pneumothorax. Verification of catheter position by chest X-ray (CXR) is usually performed postoperatively. OBJECTIVES: This prospective observational study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of peri-operative ultrasound and a 'bubble test' to detect malposition and pneumothorax. METHOD: Sixty-one patients undergoing peri-operative CVC placement were included. An ultrasound protocol was used to directly visualise the CVC, perform the 'bubble test' and assess for the presence of pneumothorax. The time from agitated saline injection to visualisation of microbubbles in the right atrium was evaluated to determine the correct position of the CVC. The time required to perform the ultrasound assessment was compared to that of conducting the CXR. RESULTS: Chest X-ray identified 12 (19.7%) malpositions while ultrasound identified 8 (13.1%). Ultrasound showed a sensitivity of 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72 to 0.93) and a specificity of 0.5 (95% CI: 0.16 to 0.84). The positive and negative predictive values were 0.92 (95% CI: 0.80 to 0.98) and 0.33 (95% CI: 0.10 to 0.65), respectively. No pneumothorax was identified on ultrasound and CXR. The median time for ultrasound assessment was significantly shorter at 4 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 3-6 min), compared to performing a CXR that required a median time of 29 min (IQR: 18-56 min) (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study showed that ultrasound produced a high sensitivity and moderate specificity in detecting CVC malposition. CONTRIBUTION: Ultrasound can improve efficiency when used as a rapid bedside screening test to detect CVC malposition.

Palabras clave : central venous catheter; position; chest X-ray; ultrasound; peri-operative; CVC; CXR.

        · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons