SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.121 número10 índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

    Links relacionados

    • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
    • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

    Compartir


    Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy

    versión On-line ISSN 2411-9717versión impresa ISSN 2225-6253

    Resumen

    VAN ROOYEN, M.; VAN STADEN, P.J.  y  DU PREEZ, K.A.. Sulphate removal technologies for the treatment of mine-impacted water. J. S. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. [online]. 2021, vol.121, n.10, pp.523-530. ISSN 2411-9717.  https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-9717/1541/2021.

    Mine-impacted water, including acid mine drainage (AMD), is a global problem. While precipitation of dissolved metals and neutralization of acidity from mine-impacted water is accomplished relatively easily with lime addition, removal of sulphate to permissible discharge limits is challenging. This paper presents a high-level comparison of four sulphate removal technologies, namely reverse osmosis, ettringite precipitation, barium carbonate addition, and biological sulphate reduction. Primarily operating costs, based on reagent and utility consumptions, are compared. Each process is shown to be subject to a unique set of constraints which might favour one over another for a specific combination of location and AMD composition. Access to and cost of reagents would be a key cost component to any of the processes studied. The total cost calculated for each process also depends on the type of effluents that are allowed to be discharged.

    Palabras clave : acid mine water; sulphate removal; reverse osmosis; ettringite; barium carbonate; and biological reduction.

            · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )