SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.61 número4Current practice of inguinal hernia repair at University of Cape Town affiliated hospitals: implications for training índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


South African Journal of Surgery

versión On-line ISSN 2078-5151
versión impresa ISSN 0038-2361

Resumen

WAIN, AB; WALL, S  y  CLARKE, DL. Adverse events associated with the use of indwelling devices in surgical patients. S. Afr. j. surg. [online]. 2023, vol.61, n.4, pp.11-15. ISSN 2078-5151.  http://dx.doi.org/10.36303/sajs.4019.

BACKGROUND: Indwelling devices (IDs) are ubiquitous in modern healthcare and may often be associated with morbidity. This paper investigates adverse events related to IDs in surgical patients, which are generally placed into patients either to administer therapy, manage outputs or for specific therapeutic benefit. METHODS: A retrospective electronic database-based assessment of all adverse events relating to IDs was undertaken from December 2012 to August 2021. All events were categorised by device type, event type, and event severity. RESULTS: A total of 11 130 morbidities were captured over the study period. Of those, 2 195 entries pertained to an ID with 2 402 reported adverse events affecting 1 592 patients. Two-thirds occurred in males and injuries occurred in patients age ranging from eight days to 93 years, with an average age of 36 years. The most frequently implicated devices were surgical drains (including intercostal chest drains), accounting for 491 (20.44%) of adverse events. Central venous catheters (CVCs) and intravenous cannulae were involved in 374 (15.57%) and 332 (13.83%) events, respectively. Unplanned removal (346, 13.91%), output not measured (319, 12.82%), injury (314, 12.62%), and blockage (279, 11.21%) were the most common error types. The majority of adverse events were considered minor, however 27 (1.1%) patients experienced organ dysfunction as a result of an ID-related adverse event, and seven (0.3%) died. CONCLUSION: Morbidity related to IDs in surgical patients is a relatively frequent occurrence. Standardisation of ID insertion and care, staff education, and improvements in communication have been identified as the most important strategies by which we can limit error-associated morbidity in patients with IDs.

Palabras clave : adverse events; complications; central venous catheters (CVC); drain; peripherally inserted venous cannula (PIVC); error.

        · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons