SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.110 número6Leadership and early strategic response to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic at a COVID-19 designated hospital in South AfricaCOVID-19: Mandatory institutional isolation v. voluntary home self-isolation índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

    Links relacionados

    • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
    • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

    Compartir


    SAMJ: South African Medical Journal

    versión On-line ISSN 2078-5135versión impresa ISSN 0256-9574

    Resumen

    MOODLEY, K; OBASA, A E  y  LONDON, L. Isolation and quarantine in South Africa during COVID-19: Draconian measures or proportional response?. SAMJ, S. Afr. med. j. [online]. 2020, vol.110, n.6, pp.1-2. ISSN 2078-5135.  https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2020.v110i6.14842.

    In the midst of an unprecedented public health crisis, extraordinary containment measures must be implemented. These include both isolation and quarantine, either on a voluntary basis or enforced. In the transition from voluntary to mandatory isolation, conflicts arise at the intersection of ethics, human rights and the law. The Siracusa Principles adopted by the United Nations Economic and Social Council in 1985 and enshrined in international human rights legislation and guidelines specify conditions under which civil liberties may be infringed. In order for isolation processes in South Africa to claim legitimacy, it is important that these principles as well as national laws and constitutional rights are embedded in state action.

            · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )