SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.34 número5Perceptions of students on factors that constrain their involvement in quality assurance and promotion in two comprehensive universities in South AfricaIndicators of students' satisfaction of quality education services in some selected universities in Ghana índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

    Links relacionados

    • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
    • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

    Compartir


    South African Journal of Higher Education

    versión On-line ISSN 1753-5913

    Resumen

    NCUBE, M.. Quality assurance-student involvement confluence: exploring gaps and implications for higher education institutions in Zimbabwe. S. Afr. J. High. Educ. [online]. 2020, vol.34, n.5, pp.47-60. ISSN 1753-5913.  https://doi.org/10.20853/34-5-4256.

    Since postulation, the student involvement (SI) theory of development by Alexander Astin has been crucial in reconfiguring and maximizing the higher education experience through improving the quality. Student-input is instrumental in examining student-experience and managing the quality in higher-education-institutions (HEIs). Amidst industrial revolutionary technologies that transcend bureaucratic procedures governing HEIs, involving students, most of whom are technologically savvy, potentially sparks innovation. Transitioning from education 3.0 to doctrine education 5.0 has implications of quality assurance (QA)-student involvement (SI) confluence on Zimbabwe's HEIs. Two out of nine HEIs in Matabeleland were selected for convenience of location. Findings show SI should precede QA outcomes although HEI practices do-not reflect this important means-to-an-end-relationship. To attain quality under the doctrine, SI must satisfy students on all doctrine 5.0's standards. Few HEI-programmes target SI for QA. Programming gaps affect student-learning, hence innovative learning-systems must respond to evolving societal-needs and satisfy students-diversity including in curriculum-development; staff-quality; and research and development-projects. Thus, SI reflects placation at best and tokenism at worst. Government/HEIs must export leading academics, fund their attainment of updated skills-set from modernised countries, and deploy them to reorient HEI programmes while concurrently modernising industries to ensure newly attained skills have platforms for applicability.

    Palabras clave : student-involvement; quality-assurance; confluence; HEIs; criteria.

            · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )