SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número69The criminalisation of gang activity in South Africa: Re-assessing the rationaleAdmission of guilt fine: A legal shortcut with delayed shock? índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

    Links relacionados

    • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
    • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

    Compartir


    South African Crime Quarterly

    versión On-line ISSN 2413-3108versión impresa ISSN 1991-3877

    Resumen

    SWEMMER, Sheena. Justice Denied? Prosecutors and presiding officers' reliance on evidence of previous sexual history in South African rape trials. SA crime q. [online]. 2020, n.69, pp.45-56. ISSN 2413-3108.  https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3108/2020/i69a6380.

    This article presents data from a study conducted by the Medical Research Council of South Africa, focusing on rape attrition in South Africa at different stages in the processes (from reporting at a police station to potential conviction). The study found that of the 3 952 reported cases of rape analysed 65% were referred to prosecution, and trials commenced in 18,5% of cases. Of the total 3 952 cases reported, 8,6% resulted in a guilty verdict. Using qualitative data from a subset of trial transcripts, the article focuses specifically on the problematic views of both presiding officers and prosecutors based on rape myths and gender-stereotyping at trial, and suggests that these are a factor affecting the attrition rate between cases referred to trial and those that result in a not guilty verdict.

            · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )