Resumen

MAKWAIBA, Basutu S. Tension between the individual's fundamental human rights and the protection of the public from infectious and formidable epidemic diseases. Afr. hum. rights law j. [online]. 2021, vol.21, n.1, pp.311-334. ISSN 1996-2096.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1996-2096/2021/v21n1a14.

Emerging infectious and formidable epidemic diseases are a cause for concern and a serious threat to the global health. At the time of writing a number of these diseases have no cure. States in their domestic legislation applicable to matters of public health have come up with approaches to deal with such diseases. Zimbabwe has enacted primary legislation and regulations dealing with public health in an effort to suppress and prevent these diseases. The Zimbabwean Public Health Act, for example, authorises the notification of infectious and formidable epidemic diseases and the inspection of infected premises. The Act further empowers the Minister of Health and Child Care to enact regulations. Through the Public Health Regulations, the government of Zimbabwe declared COVID-19 a formidable epidemic disease. Warranted by the Health Act, the Minister of Health and Child Care made treatment, testing, detention and isolation compulsory during the period in which COVID-19 is declared a formidable epidemic disease. This article seeks to provide a critical analysis of these measures as provided in the Public Health Act and health regulations in light of the constitutionally-guaranteed rights of privacy, freedom of security, liberty and freedom of movement. The question sought to be answered by the author is whether these measures justifiably trumps the rights of individuals.

Palabras clave : infectious diseases; formidable epidemic diseases; public health; fundamental human rights; legislation.

        · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )