SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.65 número1 índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


South African Family Practice

versión On-line ISSN 2078-6204
versión impresa ISSN 2078-6190

Resumen

MOTHIBA, Marabe S.; TSHEPUWANE, Tshimane C.; ADEFOLALU, Adegoke O.  y  MONOKOANE, Tshweu S.. Alexis O-ring wound retractor versus traditional metal retractors for the prevention of postcaesarean surgical site infections. SAFP [online]. 2023, vol.65, n.1, pp.1-6. ISSN 2078-6204.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/safp.v65i1.5651.

BACKGROUND: Postcaesarean surgical site infections (SSI) remain a burden globally. The Alexis® O C-Section Retractor, a plastic sheath retractor known to have decreased incidence of SSIs in gastrointestinal surgery, is yet to have its efficacy established during caesarean section (CS). This study aimed to compare the differences in the rate of postcaesarean surgical wound site infections between the Alexis® retractor and traditional metal retractors during CS at a large tertiary hospital in Pretoria METHODS: Pregnant women scheduled for elective CS were prospectively randomised to either the Alexis® retractor group or the traditional metal retractor group at a tertiary hospital in Pretoria between August 2015 and July 2016. The defined primary outcome was development of SSI, and secondary outcomes comprised patients' peri-operative parameters. All participants' wound sites were observed in the hospital for 3 days before discharge and again at 30 days postpartum. Data were analysed using SPSS version 25 with p < 0.05 considered significant RESULTS: A total of 207 participants were involved, Alexis® (n = 102) and metal retractors (n = 105). None of the participants developed postsurgical site wound infection after 30 days, and there were no differences in time to delivery, total operative time, estimated blood loss or postoperative pain between the two arms of study CONCLUSION: The study found no difference in participants' outcomes using the Alexis® retractor in comparison with the traditional metal wound retractors. We suggest that the use of Alexis® retractor be at the surgeon's discretion and its routine use not advised for now CONTRIBUTION: This research being the first of its kind in South Africa in which patients' clinical outcomes were compared post caesarean section from Alexis's plastic sheath group and metal retractors group in an attempt to proffer solution to the high burden of SSI. Although no difference was seen at this point, the research was pragmatic, as it was carried out in a setting with high burden of SSI. The study is going to serve as a baseline against which studies carried out in future can be compared

Palabras clave : metal retractors; wound retraction; Alexis® O-ring retractors; plastic sheath wound retractor; surgical site infection; caesarean section.

        · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons