SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.116 número11 índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

    Links relacionados

    • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
    • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

    Compartir


    Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy

    versión On-line ISSN 2411-9717versión impresa ISSN 2225-6253

    Resumen

    FOURIE, A.  y  MINNITT, R.C.A.. Review of gold reef sampling and its impact on the mine call factor. J. S. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. [online]. 2016, vol.116, n.11, pp.1001-1009. ISSN 2411-9717.  https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-9717/2016/v116n11a2.

    Sampling error and bias, especially the Increment Preparation Error (IPE), are introduced when the tool allocated to do the job fails to extract a representative sample. This is the case with chip sampling; the tool can only extract haphazard shapes of loose or fractured material and not always from within the demarcated sample area. Increment Extraction Error (IEE) and Increment Delimitation Error (IDE) could be severe, but are found to be relatively unbiased. The uncontrolled action of the sampler in discarding excess sample material after sample collection has a significant impact on the error and bias introduced with each and every extraction. A new type of bias, referred to as the 'waste discard bias', arises when samplers select what portion of the excess sample material to discard at the sample site. Material visually identified as waste is discarded in preference to mineralized broken ore if there is an excess of sample material. This results in a considerable error in the analytical results. The bias is proportional to the reef-waste ratio in the demarcated sample.

    Palabras clave : sampling; error; bias; mine call factor.

            · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )