SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.53 número1Gender-based violence ignites the re-emergence of public opinion on the exercise of judicial authorityConceptualising the home in law and gender índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

    Links relacionados

    • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
    • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

    Compartir


    De Jure Law Journal

    versión On-line ISSN 2225-7160versión impresa ISSN 1466-3597

    Resumen

    NANIMA, Robert Doya. Evaluating the jurisprudence of the African Commission on evidence obtained through human rights violations. De Jure (Pretoria) [online]. 2020, vol.53, n.1, pp.307-331. ISSN 2225-7160.  https://doi.org/10.17159/2225-7160/2020/v53a20.

    The normative framework of the African Commission, which regulates the admission of evidence obtained through human rights violations, is largely based on a number of instruments. These include the Tunisian Resolution, the Dakar Declaration, the Robben Island Guidelines and the Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Fair Trial and Legal Representation in Africa. It is argued that the emerging jurisprudence on evidence obtained through human rights violations has a limited developmental framework, owing to the normative framework. This contribution discusses the normative framework, and qualifies the limited jurisprudence. The final step engages the jurisprudence of the Commission followed by a conclusion and recommendations.

            · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )