SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.10 número1 índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


African Evaluation Journal

versión On-line ISSN 2306-5133
versión impresa ISSN 2310-4988

Resumen

BLASER-MAPITSA, Caitlin. A scoping review of intersections between indigenous knowledge systems and complexity-responsive evaluation research. AEJ [online]. 2022, vol.10, n.1, pp.1-10. ISSN 2306-5133.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/aej.v10i1.624.

BACKGROUND: Acknowledging the need to transform the evaluation sector in Africa, locally generated approaches have been a recent area of contestation for both researchers and practitioners. Whilst the need for an African evaluation approach has been well established in the literature, there are still significant gaps in a proactive response. One of these gaps is the role of indigenous knowledge systems in these evaluation approaches. Indigenous knowledge systems have been a priority research area for decades, often in fields of science and technology, education and in research methods. Despite these strong overlaps with areas of interest to evaluators, there has been relatively little intersection between research on evaluation systems and that on indigenous knowledge systems OBJECTIVES: This article brings together these two areas of research to see what lessons for African-rooted evaluation approaches emerge from the body of research on indigenous knowledge systems METHOD: To do this, a scoping review was conducted, applying a thematic analysis to literature identified for inclusion in the study RESULTS: This study found that there is considerable scope for the evaluation sector to draw on indigenous knowledge systems research, particularly drawing on process and methodological lessons from designing studies, as well as defining power dynamics and critical systems approaches CONCLUSION: This analysis can contribute to a needed debate about how to define and promote localised, contextually relevant evaluation tools and methods. It can also contribute to building a research agenda around African evaluation approaches

Palabras clave : evaluation; critical systems; indigenous knowledge systems; research methods; applied research; transforming development.

        · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons