SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.15 número1A linguistic analysis of spelling errors in Grade 3 isiXhosa home-language learnersInvestigating the interpretation and implementation of policies that guide the teaching of reading in the Foundation Phase índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

    Links relacionados

    • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
    • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

    Compartir


    Reading & Writing

    versión On-line ISSN 2308-1422versión impresa ISSN 2079-8245

    Resumen

    PEUNGCHAROENKUN, Tipaya  y  WALUYO, Budi. Writing pedagogy in higher education: The efficacy of mediating feedback with technology. Reading & Writing [online]. 2024, vol.15, n.1, pp.1-12. ISSN 2308-1422.  https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v15i1.487.

    BACKGROUND: Research in the field of writing pedagogy within higher education has extensively examined the significant roles that feedback plays in the development of students' writing skills. However, comparative studies that investigate the efficacy of teacher-provided written and oral feedback, both with and without the aid of technology, remain scarce. Such research is crucial for understanding the impact of different feedback modalities on student learning and could inform best practices in educational settings. OBJECTIVES: This research, which was part of a larger study, specifically examined the impact of teacher-provided feedback-both written and oral-on the development of students' writing skills. We conducted this evaluation within the framework of the process-genre approach, comparing the outcomes of technology-facilitated feedback with traditional methods of delivery. The study sought to determine which forms of feedback, technology-mediated or otherwise, are the most effective in enhancing students' writing proficiency. METHOD: It used a sequential explanatory design, selecting 28 first-year students from a veterinary international programme through purposive sampling. The participants were divided into control and experimental groups. Data collection methods included written and oral feedback surveys, pre-test and post-test evaluations, formative essay assessments, and participant interviews. RESULTS: The experimental group, receiving technology-mediated teacher feedback through writeabout.com, demonstrated significantly better writing skills compared to the control group with a conventional lesson plan. Students found the technology-mediated written feedback efficient and precise, but faced language proficiency challenges and sought more personalised interaction. There was a strong positive correlation between this feedback and various aspects of writing achievement, including task response, coherence, lexical resources, and grammatical accuracy. CONCLUSION: The research highlights the significance of a balanced feedback provision strategy that accommodates the varied preferences of students CONTRIBUTION: It adds to the wider conversation on efficacious writing pedagogy within Thai Higher Education, spotlighting the beneficial effects of technology-mediated feedback as part of the process-genre approach.

    Palabras clave : technology-mediated feedback; Thai Higher Education; written feedback; oral feedback; process-genre approach.

            · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )