Serviços Personalizados
Artigo
Indicadores
Links relacionados
-
Citado por Google
-
Similares em Google
Compartilhar
South African Journal of Animal Science
versão On-line ISSN 2221-4062
versão impressa ISSN 0375-1589
S. Afr. j. anim. sci. vol.52 no.3 Pretoria 2022
http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v52i3.4
Effect of ferulic acid on growth, digestibility, digestive enzyme activity, immunity and antioxidant status of broilers
J. DuI, II; Y. WangI, II; R. WangI, II; X. JiI; J. ZhangI, II; T. GuoI, II; Y. HuI, II; X. AnI, II; A. GaoI, #; J. QiI, II, #
ICollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, P.R. China
IIInner Mongolia Herbivorous Livestock Feed Engineering Technology Research Centre, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, P.R. China
ABSTRACT
This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of ferulic acid (FA) on the growth, nutrient digestibility, digestive enzyme activities, immunity and antioxidant status of broilers. Ninety-six one-day-old male Arbor Acres broilers were randomly divided into two groups with six replicates of eight birds each, including control group (CON) and FA group (80 mg/kg diet). The experiment included starter (days 1-21) and finisher (days 22-42) phases. Compared with CON, FA group had higher average daily weight gain (ADWG) and lower feed to gain ratio (F:G) in the starter phase, and higher average daily feed intake (ADFI) in the finisher phase. The digestibility of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP) and ether extract (EE) were higher in FA-fed broilers in days 19-21, but DM, OM and EE digestibility were lower in days 40-42. Ferulic acid treatment increased duodenal trypsin and jejunal amylase activity on day 21, but decreased duodenal trypsin, chymotrypsin activities and jejunal lipase activity on day 42. FA supplementation increased serum immunoglobulin M (IgM) and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) concentrations on day 21. Ferulic acid-fed broilers had greater hepatic glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activity and lower serum malondialdehyde (MDA) level on day 21. On day 42, the serum superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, hepatic SOD and GSH-Px activities was decreased in FA group. In conclusion, FA as an exogenous antioxidant at dosage of 80 mg/kg diet enhanced growth performance via improvement of digestive enzyme activities, immunity and antioxidant status of broilers in starter phase.
Key words: feed supplement; immunologic function; natural antioxidant; phenolic acid
Introduction
Population growth in China and changes in lifestyle and food preferences have led to increasing demand for animal protein. As one of the most important meat sources, broiler chicken production has increased tremendously in the past decades (Yuan et al., 2018). However, modern large-scale broiler production provokes stressful situations for the animals, such as fast growth, overcrowding, heat, handling, disease and infection (Farahat et al., 2016). These stressors elevate the production of free radicals and break the balance between the oxidation and antioxidant defence systems of chickens, resulting in oxidative stress (Espinosa-Diez et al., 2015), which causes damage to DNA, proteins and lipids, leading to immune inhibition, inflammation and growth restriction (Jia et al., 2014). Therefore, attempts have been made to conquer oxidative stress and enhance immunity and performance of broilers with antioxidants.
Many studies have reported on supplementation with natural antioxidants that originated from herbs, spices and propolis, which enhanced antioxidant capacity, immunity and growth performance in broilers (Rizzo et al., 2008; Saeed et al., 2017). These effects are possibly related to the antioxidative potential of secondary metabolites, especially phenolic compounds (Duskaev et al., 2020). Ferulic acid (4-hydroxy-3-methoxycinnamic acid) is a natural phenolic acid, which is widely distributed in cell walls of plants, cereal grains and fruits (Kumar & Pruthi, 2014). In recent years, FA and its derivatives were found to possess various biological and pharmacological properties, among which the best documented were its antioxidant properties (Srinivasan et al., 2007). Supplementation of FA has been shown to increase the content of GSH, enhance antioxidant activity, and decrease the level of MDA in the liver of rats (Kim et al., 2011; Balasubashini et al., 2004). Inclusion of FA in diets to improve antioxidant capacity was promoted for pigs (Li et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2020). These experiments confirmed the potential effects of FA to influence performance and health of rats and pigs.
Although FA has been studied in rats and pigs, its effects on poultry are less known Galal et al. (2008) reported that the use of propolis (rich in FA) in the diet of laying hens reflected increased feed intake, egg mass and lymphocytes counts. Similarly, dietary propolis supplementation improved weight gain, lymphocyte and monocyte counts of Muscovy broiler ducks (Abdel-Rahman & Mosaad, 2013).The results of these experiments led the authors to hypothesize that feeding FA would improve the growth performance, antioxidant capacity and immunity of broilers. Furthermore, the responses of the broilers to FA supplementation might differ during two feeding periods.
Thus, the present study was conducted to evaluate the effects of FA supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, digestive enzyme activities, antioxidant status, and immune response of broiler chickens.
Materials and Methods
The study was conducted according to the Institutional Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals in China (The State Science and Technology Commission of China, 1988) and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University (Protocol number 2020066). Ferulic acid powder (purity > 98%) was purchased from Shanghai Yuanye Bio-Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).
A total of 96 one-day-old male Arbor Acres broilers were randomly divided into two groups with six replicates of eight birds each, including the control group (CON) and FA supplementation group. The CON group was provided a corn-soybean basal diet, and the FA group was provided the basal diet plus FA (80 mg/kg diet). The experimental period lasted for 42 days. Feed intake and bodyweight (BW) were recorded by replication at days 22 and 42. The average daily weight gain (ADWG), average daily feed intake (ADFI) and feed to gain ratio (F:G) were calculated at days 1-21, 22-42 and 1-42.
The birds were kept in stainless-steel wire cages (100 χ 60 χ 50 cm) with eight chickens/cage and maintained in an environmentally controlled henhouse. Feed and water were available ad libitum. The inner temperature was kept at 35 °C for the first week, then gradually reduced by 2-3 °C per week to a final temperature of 25 °C. This temperature was maintained until the end of the experiment. For three days, the birds were exposed to light for 24 hours a day, and then they were exposed to a photoperiod with 16 hours of light and 8 hours of darkness during days 4-42. All birds were inoculated against Newcastle disease, infectious bronchitis and infectious bursal disease on days 7 and 21.
The level of addition of FA was selected according to the producer's recommendations and information obtained from previous experiments (Saeed et al., 2019; Kim et al., 2011). The basal starter rations and finisher ration were formulated based on NRC requirements (National Research Council, 1994) and met the nutrients recommendations of the Ministry of Agriculture (2004). The ingredient and chemical composition of the basal diets are presented in Table 1.
The apparent total tract digestibility of nutrients was determined using an acid insoluble ash (AIA) as an internal marker as described by Siriwan et al. (1993). For excreta collection, clean trays were placed under the cages. The excreta were collected daily during days 19-21 and 40-42. Feathers and down were removed carefully and the excreta collected per cage during three days were pooled. The representative samples of excreta were collected and dried in an oven at 65 °C for 72 hours, and then ground to pass through a 1.0 mm mill sieve. Components of feed and excreta samples in each group, including dry matter (DM) (method 934.01), crude protein (CP) (method 954.01), ash (method 930.05), ether extract (EE) (method 954.02), calcium (method 927.02), and phosphorus (method 984.27) were analysed according to AOAC (1995). Acid-insoluble ash was analysed based on the method of Keulen & Young (1977). Digestibility values were calculated as:
On day 21 and 42, one bird per replication (six per treatment) with BW similar to the mean of the full replicate cohort was selected for blood collection after 12 hours fasting. Blood samples were taken from the wing vein using Vacutainer tubes (BD Vacutainer, 5.0 mL). After standing for 45 min at room temperature, the blood samples were centrifuged at 3000 χ g for 15 min, and then serum samples were separated and stored at -20 °C for analysis of antioxidant capacity and immunity. After bleeding, the bird was slaughtered by cervical dislocation, and liver tissue samples were harvested, stored at -80 °C, and then used for antioxidant capacity assays. To determine digestive enzyme activities, the jejunum and duodenum digesta were collected into plastic tubes by massaging the tract, then immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80 °C until analysis.
Before analysis, the frozen jejunum and duodenum digesta samples were thawed. One g of each sample was diluted with 9 mL of ice-cold normal saline (0.9%), homogenized and centrifuged at 9000 χ g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatants of digesta homogenates were used for digestive enzyme activities assay. The α-amylase (C016-1-1), lipase (A054-1-1), trypsin (A080-2-2) and chymotrypsin (A080-3-1) activities were analysed with commercial colorimetric diagnostic kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
The concentrations of immunoglobulin A (IgA) (JYM0012Ch), immunoglobulin G (IgG) (JYM0001Ch) and immunoglobulin M (IgM) (JYM0060Ch), interleukin-2 (IL-2) (JYM0026Ch), interleukin-6 (IL-6) (JYM0028Ch), interleukin-10 (IL-10) (JYM0040Ch) and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) (JYM0033Ch) in serum were measured using chicken-specific ELISA kits (Colorful Gene Biological Technology Co., Ltd, Wuhan, China). All measurements were conducted according to the manufacturer's instructions.
The liver sample was homogenized with sterile ice-cold normal saline (0.9%) with a weight-to-volume ratio of 1:9. The supernatant was obtained after centrifuging at 9000 χ g for 10 min at 4 °C. The concentrations of hepatic superoxide dismutase (SOD) (A001-2-2), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) (A005-1 -2), and malondialdehyde (MDA) (A003-1 -2) were determined with commercial assay kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China) according to Hao et al. (2015).
All data were analysed using t-tests to compare the treatment and control diets (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA). Significance was considered at P <0.05 and tendency when 0.05 < P < 0.10.
Results and Discussion
Throughout the experimental periods, supplementation of FA did not affect the BW of broilers compared with that of the CON group (P >0.10). From days 1 to 21, broilers fed FA had higher ADWG (P =0.048) than CON group (Figure 1).
The ADFI of broilers was increased (P 0.001) by feeding with FA in days 22-42. From days 1 to 21, broilers fed FA had lower F:G (P =0.002) than CON group (Figure 2), probably as a result of their increased growth rate. However, growth performance measured as ADWG, ADFI and F:G showed no differences (P >0.10) between FA and CON during the whole period.
Natural plant extracts contain a variety of phenolic compounds such as phenolic acids, flavonoids and other polyphenols, which exert health promoting effects in poultry diets (Surai, 2014). Ferulic acid is a copious and almost ubiquitous phenolic acid, present in plant cell wall components as covalent side chains (Kumar & Pruthi, 2014). Inclusion of FA in diets of other farm animals exhibited growth promoting, antioxidative and immune stimulating effects (Wang et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2020; Pena-Torres et al., 2021). The current study assumed that FA supplementation would improve antioxidant capacity and immunity, thereby promoting growth of broilers. The current results supported the hypothesis of elevated ADWG and reduced F:G on day 21 with FA feeding. However, since there were no reports on the effects of FA on broilers, it is difficult to make direct comparisons. In Muscovy broiler ducks, Abdel-Rahman & Mosaad (2013) found the weight gain was increased and feed conversion efficiency was decreased by propolis (a supplement rich in FA). The performance-promoting effects of FA could be related to improved nutrient digestibility (Seven, 2008). It was confirmed by the increased nutrient digestibility during the starter phase in this study. Furthermore, the increases in growth performance of broilers may be associated partly with the antioxidative effects of FA, because higher antioxidant enzyme activities were observed in the current study.
The digestibility of DM, OM, CP and EE were higher (P <0.05) in broilers fed FA diet compared with CON in days 19-21 (Table 2). However, in days 40-42, decreased digestibility of DM, OM and EE (P <0.05) was observed in FA group compared with CON. Additionally, CP digestibility tended (P =0.065) to decrease in FA-fed broilers during the same period.
One of the most important factors for improving growth performance of animals is an increase in apparent digestibility odr utilization of major nutrients. In the current study, digestibility of DM, OM, CP and EE was increased by feeding FA in the starter period. The beneficial effects of phenolic compounds on nutrient digestibility of broilers were established in many reports. For instance, Hernández et al. (2004) demonstrated that supplementation of plant extracts increased the apparent digestibility of DM and EE. Malekzadeh et al. (2018) found that thyme extract increased DM, OM and EE digestibility. Similar findings were supported by Long et al. (2020), who found that DM and OM digestibility was improved by Forsythia suspensa extract. However, limited data have been reported of FA supplementation. Seven (2008) observed that propolis enhanced the apparent digestibility of DM, OM, CP, EE of broilers under heat stress. The increase in nutrient digestibility was probably related to the activities of digestive enzymes from the pancreas and intestinal mucosa, which might be stimulated by phenolic compounds (Hashemipour et al., 2013). Thus, the authors speculated that FA could enhance nutrient digestibility of broilers by increasing duodenal trypsin activity and jejunal amylase activity in their study.
No significant differences (P >0.10) were observed for FA supplementation in duodenal amylase and lipase activities on days 21 and 42 (Table 3). In comparison with the CON group, FA treatment increased (P <0.001) the duodenal trypsin activity on day 21. However, on day 42, the duodenal trypsin and chymotrypsin activities were decreased by FA supplementation (P <0.05).
Dietary FA supplementation did not influence jejunal trypsin and chymotrypsin activities on days 21 and 42 (P >0.10) (Table 4). The jejunal amylase activity was increased (P =0.049) by FA supplementation on day 21, whereas no difference was found on day 42 (P >0.10). On the contrary, jejunal lipase activity was unaffected (P >0.10) by FA supplementation, but a decrease (P =0.015) was observed on day 42.
Digestive enzymes play a key role in digestion of nutrient substrates. Their activities reflect digestive capacity directly, and are closely related to growth performance of broilers (Lee et al., 2003). The potential of phenolic compounds to stimulate digestive enzymes secretion was recorded in several studies (PuvaCa et al., 2013). Hashemipour et al. (2013) reported that supplementation of thymol and carvacrol in broiler diet ncreased the intestinal and pancreatic trypsin, protease, and lipase enzymes activities. Although Seven et al. (2008) indicated that FA-rich propolis favoured the nutrient digestibility of broilers, there are limited reports on its impacts on digestive enzyme activities. Eyng et al. (2014) indicated that pancreatic enzyme activity was unaffected by feeding ethanolic extract of propolis. As expected, the current data demonstrated that the use of FA in the diet enhanced duodenal trypsin and jejunal amylase activities on day 21. A possible explanation for this may be because of the improvement of antioxidant status by dietary FA supplementation.
Relative to the CON group (Table 5), FA supplementation increased serum IgM and TNF-α concentrations (P <0.05) and tended (P =0.088) to increase serum IL-2 concentration on day 21, but these effects were not observed on day 42 (p >0.10). No significant differences were noted for the values of IgA, gG, IL-6 and IL-10 between the treatments in serum samples of broilers on day 21 and 42 (P >0.10).
The immune status of the host plays an important role in resisting infection. Phenolic compounds in plant extracts improved host immune functions (Lee et al., 2018). FA-rich propolis has been reported to possess immunomodulating activities through the activation of lymphocytes in laying hens (Galal et al., 2008) and lymphocytes and monocytes in Muscovy broiler ducks (Abdel-Rahman & Mosaad 2013). Attia et al. (2017) indicated that the antibody titers against Avian influenza, Newcastle disease and infectious Bursal disease and IgA and IgM contents of broilers were increased with propolis supplementation. In the current experiment, dietary FA supplementation promoted the humoral immune response, leading to an increase in serum IgM concentration on day 21. Immunoglobulin A, IgM, and IgG are three major immunoglobulin involved in the maintenance of immune status in broilers. In the current study, the authors found that dietary FA supplementation increased serum TNF-α and IL-2 concentrations on day 21. As the most important T-cell growth factor, cytokine interleukin plays an important role in promoting the antibody production of the host (Choi & Lillehoj, 2000). The current results suggested dietary FA supplementation increased the TNF-α and IL-2 levels, and stimulated the production of IgM. The presence of sufficient levels of antioxidants inside the body protected immune cells from oxidative stress and thus enhanced antibody production (De La Fuente & Victor, 2000). Therefore, the immune stimulating effects of FA may be attributed to its antioxidative activity.
Ferulic acid supplementation decreased (P =0.0025) serum MDA level compared with the CON group on day 21, whereas the serum SOD and GSH-Px activities did not vary (P >0.10) between groups (Table 6). On day 42, SOD activity was decreased (P <0.05) in FA group compared with CON.
Effects of dietary FA supplementation on hepatic antioxidant status of broilers are presented in Table 7. On day 21, broilers fed FA had greater (P =0.040) GSH-Px activity in the liver than CON. On day 42, the hepatic SOD and GSH-Px activities was decreased (P <0.05) in FA group compared with CON. Moreover, an increasing trend (P =0.078) of MDA was observed in the liver
Excessive formation of free radicals and decreased activity of antioxidant defence systems contribute to a disturbance to the equilibrium status of prooxidant and antioxidant system in favour of pro-oxidation (Kennedy et al., 2005), which gives rise to oxidative stress, growth reduction and immune suppression of broilers (Salami et al., 2015). Antioxidant enzymes such as CAT, SOD and GSH-Px form part of the antioxidant defence system against oxidative stress (Wang et al., 2017). Phenolic compounds are regarded as natural sources to scavenge excess free radicals (Krishnaiah et al., 2011) and improve the antioxidant capacity of farm animals (Gessner et al., 2017). Similarly to several other phenolic compounds, FA are able to scavenge free radicals directly via donating one hydrogen atom from its phenolic hydroxyl group (Srinivasan et al., 2007). More importantly, FA could induce the activation of Nrf2-ARE pathway, which leads to an activation of antioxidant enzymes (Mahmoud et al., 2020). The current results showed that dietary supplementation with FA increased hepatic GSH-Px activity of broilers on day 21. In agreement with the current findings, Li et al. (2015) indicated that FA increased the hepatic GSH-Px activity of finishing pigs. Wang et al., (2020) confirmed that dietary FA supplementation increased hepatic CAT, T-SOD, and GSH-Px activities and upregulated the protein levels of Nrf2, HO-1 and NQO-1 in weaned piglets. The positive effects of FA-rich propolis on serum SOD and GSH-Px activities in broilers were also reported by Attia et al. (2017). Among the biological targets of oxidative stress, lipids are the most involved class of biomolecules. Malondialdihyde is the principal and product of lipid peroxidation. In this study, the MDA level was lower in the serum of broilers fed with FA on day 21. This decrease may be because of elevating antioxidative enzyme activities. Based on these findings, the authors stated that FA might play an important role as an exogenous antioxidant in improving growth performance and immune status of broilers during the starter phase.
Opposite to results found during the starter phase, FA-fed broilers during the finisher phase had reduced growth performance and antioxidant status at dosage of 80 mg/kg diet. In this study, duodenal trypsin and chymotrypsin activities and jejunal lipase activity were suppressed in broilers supplemented with FA on day 42. The suppression of enzymatic activity was reflected in the decreased digestibility of DM, OM, and EE and increased ADFI. The authors have no clear explanation for these results. Ocak et al. (2008) found that the beneficial effects of dry peppermint and thyme on growth performance disappeared at 42 days old. In agreement with these authors, Hernández et al. (2004) reported the nutrients digestibility of broilers fed with plant extracts during the finisher phase was lower than during the starter phase. Zdunczyk et al. (2002a) reported a negative correlation between phenolic compound contents and nutrient digestibility, which was attributed to the interaction of reactive hydroxyl groups of phenolic compounds with the carbonyl group of digestive enzymes (You et al., 2011). Although no evidence was presented in FA-fed broilers, a study with lambs reported that a prolonged feeding period with FA tended to decrease feedlot performance (Macías-Cruz et al., 2014). Reduced serum SOD activity and hepatic SOD and GSH-Px activities and an increased hepatic MDA level were also observed in this study. Oxidized phenols (such as quinones and semiquinones) formed from FA during redox reactions could be deleterious (Truong et al., 2020). The concentration-dependent antioxidant or prooxidant activities of FA were also reported in an earlier study (Maurya & Devasagayam, 2010). Therefore, the depression of growth performance and antioxidative status of broilers during the finisher phase could be because of the long-term-cumulative effects of FA.
Conclusion
Ferulic acid can serve as an exogenous antioxidant at a dosage of 80 mg/kg diet to enhance growth performance via improvement of digestive enzyme activities, immunity and antioxidant status of broilers in the starter phase.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by 'Double First-rate' Discipline Innovation Team Programme for Talents by IMAU (NDSC2018-02); Major Science and Technology Programme of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (2020ZD0004); Key Technology Project of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (2020GG0030). The authors thank all the laboratory colleagues for sample collection, and laboratory analysis.
Authors' Contributions
Conceptualization, XA , AG and JQ; Data curation, formal analysis and investigation, JD, RW, XJ, JZ, TG, and YH; Writing-original draft, JD; Writing-review and editing, YW; Funding acquisition, YW, AG and JQ; All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict of interest declaration
The authors certify that there is no potential conflict of interest to disclose.
References
Abdel-Rahman, M.A. & Mosaad, G.M., 2013. Effect of propolis as additive on some behavioural patterns, performance and blood parameters in Muscovy broiler ducks. J. Adv. Vet. Res. 3, 64-68. [ Links ]
AOAC, 1995. Official methods of analysis of the Association of Analytical Chemists. AOAC, Washington DC, USA. [ Links ]
Attia, A., Al-Khalaifah, H., Ibrahim, M.S., Al-Hamid, A.E.A., AI-Harthi, M.A. & EI-Naggar, A., 2017. Blood hematological and biochemical constituents, antioxidant enzymes, immunity and lymphoid organs of broiler chicks supplemented with propolis, bee pollen and mannan oligosaccharides continuously or intermittently. Poult. Sci. 96, 4182-4192. DOI: 10.3382/ps/pex173 [ Links ]
Balasubashini, M.S., Rukkumani, R., Viswanathan, P. & Venugopal, P.M., 2004. Ferulic acid alleviates lipid peroxidation in diabetic rats. Phytother. Res. 18, 310-314. DOI: 10.1002/ptr.1440 [ Links ]
Ministry of Agriculture, 2004. Feeding standard of chicken. Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Ministry of Agriculture Bulletin No. 402. [ Links ]
Choi, K.D. & Lillehoj, H.S., 2000. Role of chicken IL-2 on gammadelta T-cells and Eimeria acer-vulina-induced changes in intestinal IL-2 mRNA expression and gammadelta T-cells. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 73, 309-321. DOI: 10.1016/S0165-2427(00)00148-3 [ Links ]
De la Fuente, M. & Victor, V.M., 2000. Anti-oxidants as modulators of immune function. Immunol. Cell Biol. 78, 49-54. DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1711.2000.00884.x [ Links ]
Duskaev, G.K., Kvan, O.V. & Rakhmatullin, S.G., 2020. Eucalyptus viminalis leaf extract alters the productivity and blood parameters of healthy broiler chickens. Vet. World 13, 2673-2680. DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2020.2673-2680 [ Links ]
Espinosa-Diez, C., Miguel, V., Mennerich, D., Kietzmann, T., Sánchez-Pérez, P., Cadenas, S. & Lamas, S., 2015. Antioxidant responses and cellular adjustments to oxidative stress. Redox Biol. 6, 183-197. DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2015.07.008 [ Links ]
Eyng, C., Murakami, A.E., Duarte, C.R. & Santos, T.C., 2014. Effect of dietary supplementation with an ethanolic extract of propolis on broiler intestinal morphology and digestive enzyme activity. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 98, 393-401. DOI: 10.1111/jpn.12116 [ Links ]
Farahat, M., Abdallah, F., Abdel-Hamid, T. & Hernandez-Santana, A., 2016. Effect of supplementing broiler chicken diets with green tea extract on the growth performance, lipid profile, antioxidant status and immune response. Brit. Poult. Sci. 57, 714-722. DOI: 10.1080/00071668.2016.1196339 [ Links ]
Galal, A., El-Motaal, A.M.A., Ahmed, AMH. & Zaki, T.G., 2008. Productive performance and immune response of laying hens as affected by dietary propolis supplementation. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 7, 272-278. DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2008.272.278 [ Links ]
Gessner, D.K., Ringseis, R. & Eder, K., 2017. Potential of plant polyphenols to combat oxidative stress and inflammatory processes in farm animals. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 101, 605-628. DOI: 10.1111/jpn.12579 [ Links ]
González-Ríos, H., Gil, D.A. & Berrondo, A., 2013. Ferulic acid as feed supplement in beef cattle to promote animal growth and improve the meat quality of the carcass and the meat. US patent published in February. 13, 446-594. DOI: US20130041036 A1 [ Links ]
Hao, R., Li, Q., Zhao, J., Li, H., Wang, W. & Gao, J., 2015. Effects of grape seed procyanidins on growth performance, immune function and antioxidant capacity in weaned piglets. Livest. Sci. 178, 237-242. DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2015.06.004 [ Links ]
Hashemipour, H., Kermanshahi, H., Golian, A. & Veldkamp, T., 2013. Effect of thymol and carvacrol feed supplementation on performance, antioxidant enzyme activities, fatty acid composition, digestive enzyme activities, and immune response in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 92, 2059-2069. DOI: 10.3382/ps.2012-02685 [ Links ]
Hernandez, F., Madrid, J., Garcia, V., Orengo, J. & Megías, M.D., 2004. Influence of two plant extracts on broilers performance, digestibility, and digestive organ size. Poult. Sci. 83, 169-174. DOI: 10.1093/ps/83.2.169 [ Links ]
Jia, R., Bao, Y.H., Zhang, Y., Ji, C., Zhao, L.H., Zhang, J.Y., Gao, C.Q. & Ma, Q.G., 2014. Effects of dietary α-lipoic acid, acetyl-l-carnitine, and sex on antioxidative ability, energy, and lipid metabolism in broilers. Poult. Sci. 93, 28092817. DOI: 10.3382/ps.2014-03921 [ Links ]
Kennedy, G., Spence, V.A., McLaren, M., Hill, A., Underwood, C. & Belch, J.J., 2005. Oxidative stress levels are raised in chronic fatigue syndrome and are associated with clinical symptoms. Free Radic. Bio. Med. 39, 584-589. DOI:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2005.04.020 [ Links ]
Keulen, J.V. & Young, B.A., 1977. Evaluation of acid-insoluble ash as a natural marker in ruminant digestibility studies. J. Anim. Sci. 44, 282-287. DOI: 10.2527/jas1977.442282x [ Links ]
Kim, H.Y, Park, J., Lee, K.H., Lee, D.U. & Kwak, J.H., 2011. Ferulic acid protects against carbon tetrachloride-induced liver injury in mice. Toxicology 282, 104-111. DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2011.01.017 [ Links ]
Krishnaiah, D., Sarbatly, R. & Nithyanandam, R., 2011. A review of the antioxidant potential of medicinal plant species. Food Bioprod. Process. DOI: 10.1016/j.fbp.2010.04.008 [ Links ]
Kumar, N. & Pruthi, V., 2014. Potential applications of ferulic acid from natural sources. Biotechnol. Rep. 4, 86-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.btre.2014.09.002 [ Links ]
Lee, K.W., Everts, H., Kappert, H.J., Frehner, M., Losa, R. & Beynen, A.C., 2003. Effects of dietary essential oil components on growth performance, digestive enzymes and lipid metabolism in female broiler chickens. Brit. Poult. Sci. 44, 450-457. DOI: 10.1080/0007166031000085508 [ Links ]
Lee, M.T., Lin, W.C. & Lee, T.T., 2018. Potential crosstalk of oxidative stress and immune response in poultry through phytochemicals - A review. Asian-Austral. J. Anim. Sci. 32, 309-319. DOI: 10.5713/ajas.18.0538 [ Links ]
Li, Y.J., Li, L.Y., Li, J.L., Zhang, L., Gao, F. & Zhou, G.H., 2015. Effects of dietary supplementation with ferulic acid or vitamin e individually or in combination on meat quality and antioxidant capacity of finishing pigs. Asian-Austral. J. Anim. Sci. 28, 374-381. DOI: 10.5713/ajas.14.0432 [ Links ]
Long, S.F., He, T.F., Wu, D., Yang, M. & Piao, X.S., 2020. Forsythia suspensa extract enhances performance via the improvement of nutrient digestibility, antioxidant status, anti-inflammatory function and gut morphology in broilers. Poult. Sci. 99, 4217-4226. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.05.011 [ Links ]
Macías Cruz, U., Perard, S., Vicente, R., Álvarez, F.D., Torrentera Olivera, N.G., González Ríos, H., Soto Navarro, S.A., Rojo, R., Meza Herrera, C.A. & Avendaño Reyes, L., 2014. Effects of free ferulic acid on productive performance, blood metabolites, and carcass characteristics of feedlot finishing ewe lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 92, 5762 5768. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2014 8208 [ Links ]
Mahmoud, A.M., Hussein, O.E., Hozayen, W.G., Bin-Jumah, M. & EI-Twab, S.A., 2020. Ferulic acid prevents oxidative stress, inflammation, and liver injury via upregulation of Nrf2/HO-1 signaling in methotrexate-induced rats. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 27, 7910-7921. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-07532-6 [ Links ]
Malekzadeh, M., Shakouri, M.D. & Benamar, H.A., 2018. Effect of thyme species extracts on performance, intestinal morphometry, nutrient digestibility and immune response of broilers. Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg. 24, 783-790. DOI: 10.9775/kvfd.2018.19719 [ Links ]
Maurya, D.K. & Devasagayam, T.P., 2010. Antioxidant and prooxidant nature of hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives ferulic and caffeic acids. Food Chem. Toxicol. 48, 3369-3373. DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2010.09.006 [ Links ]
National Research Council, 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry: Ninth Revised Edition, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/2114. [ Links ]
Ocak, N., Erener, G., Burak, Ak, F., Sungu, M., Altop. A. & Ozmen, A., 2008. Performance of broilers fed diets supplemented with dry peppermint (Mentha piperita L.) or thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) leaves as growth promoter source. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 53, 169-175.-https://www.agriculturejournals.cz/publicFiles/01131.pdf [ Links ]
Pena-Torres, E.F., Dávila-Ramírez, J.L., Pena-Ramos, E.A., Valenzuela-Melendres, M., Pinelli-Saavedra, A., Avendano-Reyes, L. & González-Ríos, H., 2021. Effects of dietary ferulic acid on growth performance, carcass traits and meat quality of heifers. J. Sci. Food Agric. 101, 548-554. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.10666 [ Links ]
Puvača, N., Stanaćev, V., Glamočić, D., Lević, J., Perić, L., Stanaćev, V. & Milić, D., 2013. Beneficial effects of phytoadditives in broiler nutrition. World Poult. Sci. J. 69, 27 34. DOI: 10.1017/S0043933913000032 [ Links ]
Rizzo, P.V., Menten, J.F.M., Raccnicci, A.M.C. & Santarosa, J., 2008. Foundation and perspectives of the use of plant extracts as performance enhancers in broilers. Braz. J. Poult. Sci. 10, 195-204. DOI: 10.1590/S1516-635X2008000400001 [ Links ]
Saeed, M., Arain, M.A., Kamboh, A.A., Memon, S.A. & Alagawany, M., 2017. Raw propolis as a promising feed additive in poultry nutrition: Trends and advances. J. Anim. Health Prod. 5, 132-142. DOI: 10.17582/journal.jahp/2017/5.4.132.142 [ Links ]
Saeed, M., Alagawany, M., Fazlani, S.A., Kalhoro, S.A., Naveed, M., Ali, N., Arain, M.A. & Chao, S., 2019. Health promoting and pharmaceutical potential of ferulic acid for the poultry industry. World Poult. Sci. J. 75, 83-92. DOI: 10.1017/S0043933918000740 [ Links ]
Salami, S.A., Majoka, M.A., Saha, S., Garber, A. & Gabarrou, J.F., 2015. Efficacy of dietary antioxidants on broiler oxidative stress, performance and meat quality: Science and market. Avian Biol. Res. 8, 65-78. DOI: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.3184/175815515X14291701859483 [ Links ]
Seven, P.T., 2008. The effects of dietary Turkish propolis and vitamin C on performance, digestibility, egg production and egg quality in laying hens under different environmental temperatures. Asian-Austral. J. Anim. Sci. 21, 1164-1170. DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2008.70605 [ Links ]
Siriwan, P., Bryden, W.L., Mollah, Y. & Annison, E.F., 1993. Measurement of endogenous amino acid losses in poultry. Brit. Poult. Sci. 34, 939-949. DOI: 10.1080/00071669308417654 [ Links ]
Srinivasan, M., Sudheer, A.R. & Menon, V.P., 2007. Ferulic acid: therapeutic potential through its antioxidant property. J. Clin. Biochem. Nutr. 40, 92-100. DOI: 10.3164/jcbn.40.92 [ Links ]
Surai, P.F., 2014. Polyphenol compounds in the chicken/animal diet: From the past to the future. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 98, 19-31. DOI: 10.1111/jpn.12070 [ Links ]
Truong, D.H., Nhung, N.T.A. & Dao, D.Q., 2020. Iron ions chelation-based antioxidant potential vs. pro-oxidant risk of ferulic acid: A DFT study in aqueous phase. Comput. Theor. Chem. 1185, 112905. DOI:10.1016/j.comptc.2020.112905 [ Links ]
Wang, Y., Chen, X., Huang, Z., Chen, D., Yu, B., Yu, J., Chen, H., He, J., Luo, Y. & Zheng, P., 2020. Dietary ferulic acid supplementation improves antioxidant capacity and lipid metabolism in weaned piglets. Nutrients 12, 3800-3811. DOI: 10.3390/nu12123811 [ Links ]
Wang, Y., Wang, W., Wang, R.F., Meng, Z.Q., Duan, Y.X., An, X.P. & Qi, J.W., 2019. Dietary supplementation of ferulic acid improves performance and alleviates oxidative stress of lambs in a cold environment. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 99, 705-712. DOI: 10.1139/CJAS-2018-0200 [ Links ]
Wang, Y., Wu, Y., Wang, Y., Xu, H., Mei, X., Yu, D., Wang, Y. & Li, W., 2017. Antioxidant properties of probiotic bacteria. Nutrients. 9, 521-536. DOI: 10.3390/nu9050521 [ Links ]
You, Q., Chen, F., Wang, X., Luo, P.G. & Jiang, Y., 2011. Inhibitory effects of muscadine anthocyanins on α-glucosidase and pancreatic lipase activities. J. Agric. Food Chem. 59, 9506-9511. DOI: 10.1021/jf201452v [ Links ]
Yuan, M., Seale, Jr J.L., Wahl, T. & Bai J., 2018. The changing dietary patterns and health issues in China. China Agric. Econ. Rev. 11, 143-159. DOI: 10.1108/CAER-12-2017-0254 [ Links ]
Zdunczyk, Z., Frejnagel, S., Wróblewska, M., Jukiewicz, J. & Estrella, I., 2002. Biological activity of polyphenol extracts from different plant sources. Food Res. Int. 35, 183-186. DOI: 10.1016/S0963-9969(01)00181-8 [ Links ]
Submitted 1 April 2021
Accepted 12 August 2021
Published 27 May 2022
# Corresponding authors: gaoaiqin999@163.com, qijingwei_66@126.com