SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.47 número3Pre-disaster planning and preparedness: drought and flood forecasting and analysis in ZimbabweDesign optimization of water distribution networks: real-world case study with penalty-free multi-objective genetic algorithm using pressure-driven simulation índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Water SA

versão On-line ISSN 1816-7950
versão impressa ISSN 0378-4738

Resumo

MADZIVANZIRA, TC; SOUTH, J; NHIWATIWA, T  e  WEYL, OLF. Standardisation of alien invasive Australian redclaw crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus sampling gear in Africa. Water SA [online]. 2021, vol.47, n.3, pp.380-384. ISSN 1816-7950.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/wsa/2021.v47.i3.11866.

Freshwater crayfish are damaging invaders across southern Africa; however, monitoring techniques and efforts are disparate across the region as different sampling methods have been used. To develop a standard method for assessing redclaw crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus abundance, a survey was conducted to assess for differences in detection and catch per unit effort (CPUE) in Lake Kariba. Two sampling approaches were compared: opera traps baited with cooked maize meal historically used in crayfish surveys in Zimbabwe, and Promar collapsible traps baited with dry dog food, which have been used for assessments in South Africa and Swaziland. Baits were compared in the Barotse Floodplain in Zambia using the Promar trap. Detection probability (Pcapture) and CPUE were significantly lower for opera traps baited with cooked maize meal (Pcapture = 0.41; CPUE = 1.19 ± 0.24 ind.•trap -1•night -1) compared to the Promar traps baited with dry dog food (Pcapture = 0.67; CPUE = 4.53 ± 0.82 ind•trap -1•night -1). The Pcapture and CPUE for Promar traps baited with dog food (Pcapture = 0.89; CPUE = 4.29 ± 0.83 ind•trap-1•night -1) was significantly higher than for maize meal baited traps (Pcapture = 0.29; CPUE = 0.25 ± 0.17 ind•trap -1•night -1). Sex ratio and carapace length of crayfish sampled did not differ between sampling methods. Due to higher CPUE, the authors consider the Promar collapsible trap baited with dog food approach as the better method for determining crayfish population abundance and suggest that comparisons of abundance take this into consideration by applying conversion factors if different methods are applied.

Palavras-chave : Barotse Floodplain; crayfish; freshwater; Lake Kariba; opera trap; Promar trap; bait type.

        · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons