Resumo

NDAHINDA, Felix M. Peoples' rights, indigenous rights and interpretative ambiguities in decisions of the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights. Afr. hum. rights law j. [online]. 2016, vol.16, n.1, pp.29-57. ISSN 1996-2096.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1996-2096/2016/v16n1a2.

The evolving jurisprudence of the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights displays ambiguities in interpretations of the peoples' rights provisions of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights. The article comparatively examines the Endorois and Southern Cameroon decisions adopted in 2009 in an effort to uncover the challenges faced by the African Commission in contextually applying peoples' rights provisions of the African Charter to particular collectives. In the Endorois case, the Commission made a positive finding on violations of applicants' claims of violations of their collective rights as an indigenous people. Conversely, in the Southern Cameroon case, the Commission made a negative finding on the applicants' arguments for remedial secession, using more or less the same collective rights provisions of the African Charter. The article contextualises the two cases in critically examining the African Commission's legal reasoning in both decisions.

Palavras-chave : indigenous; peoples; African Commission; jurisprudence; ambiguities.

        · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )