SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.13 número1Evaluation of corrective actions of feedback from clinicians on Clinical Laboratory Services at Bamenda Regional Hospital Laboratory, CameroonAddressing the shortage of pathologists in Africa: Creation of a MMed Programme in Pathology in Zambia índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

    Links relacionados

    • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
    • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

    Compartilhar


    African Journal of Laboratory Medicine

    versão On-line ISSN 2225-2010versão impressa ISSN 2225-2002

    Resumo

    HURWITZ, Jessica S.; NEWTON-FOOT, Mae; VAN ZYL, Kristien Nel  e  NEL, Pieter. Fosfomycin susceptibility testing and resistance mechanisms in Enterobacterales in South Africa. Afr. J. Lab. Med. [online]. 2024, vol.13, n.1, pp.1-6. ISSN 2225-2010.  https://doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v13i1.2252.

    BACKGROUND: Fosfomycin treatment of urinary tract infections is increasingly attractive due to escalating antibiotic resistance rates among urinary pathogens. Standard antibiotic susceptibility testing methods perform poorly for fosfomycin as there is poor correlation between susceptibility results and clinical outcomes in urinary pathogens other than Escherichia coli. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the performance of fosfomycin susceptibility testing in E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae to determine whether fosfomycin susceptibility is associated with molecular resistance mechanisms. METHODS: Forty-six each of E. coli and K. pneumoniae clinical isolates were obtained from a tertiary hospital in South Africa, from 01 June 2017 to 31 January 2018. Agar dilution, disk diffusion, and gradient diffusion were performed and interpreted using the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing guidelines. Molecular resistance mechanisms were identified by whole genome sequence analysis. RESULTS: Disk diffusion and gradient diffusion were accurate alternatives for fosfomycin susceptibility testing in E. coli (98% categorical agreement), but not in K. pneumoniae (47% categorical agreement). All E. coli isolates contained at least one resistance mechanism, but only one isolate with a fosA gene was resistant. In K. pneumoniae, 63% (29/46) and 70% (32/46) of isolates were susceptible to fosfomycin, using Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoints, respectively, despite all isolates containing a fosA gene and a uhpT mutation. CONCLUSION: A better understanding of fosfomycin susceptibility and improved antibiotic susceptibility testing tools could improve diagnostic capability and clinical guidelines for fosfomycin treatment of urinary tract infections. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: This study highlights the importance of adhering to interpretive guidelines when performing antimicrobial susceptibility testing and the need for simplified, accurate and standardised susceptibility testing methodology and interpretation for fosfomycin in Enterobacterales organisms.

    Palavras-chave : fosfomycin; phenotypic susceptibility testing; molecular resistance mechanisms; Escherichia coli; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Enterobacterales.

            · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )