Serviços Personalizados
Journal
Artigo
Indicadores
Links relacionados
Compartilhar
Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies
versão On-line ISSN 1996-1421versão impressa ISSN 2072-845X
Jàmbá vol.10 no.1 Cape Town 2018
https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v10i1.518
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
A geographic information system-based approach of flood hazards modelling, Paschim Medinipur district, West Bengal, India
Kishor Dandapat; Gopal K. Panda
Department of Geography, Utkal University, India
ABSTRACT
From the beginning of civilisation, human beings have preferred living on the river banks which have been the most vulnerable areas of flood hazards and consequent disasters. During the monsoon period, in many developing countries of south-east Asia, flood hazards and disasters have been a serious challenge for their development. Most of the rivers exceed their normal channel capacity attaining the flood stage and frequently overflow their banks, causing great havoc to the life and property of the people. Flooding is a very serious problem in many districts of West Bengal. The prime concern of delineation of flood-prone areas is to regulate the land use in the flood-prone areas to restrict damage potential and also mitigate the negative effects of floods on people and the economy. In a regulated way, flood-prone areas are required to be developed. Because, on one hand, it is to be ensured that existing hazard and flood damage potential do not increase and new developmental works become a step towards mitigation of disaster risk. In a perspective view, the demarcation and identification of flood-prone areas of different magnitudes, frequencies and return periods on a large-scale map seem to have great importance. Satellite-derived flood maps from 2007 to 2016 have been applied to form a flood frequency map and the same as a group of flood depth maps has been employed to produce the Flood Damage Map for depth data of flood. Finally, the modelling of flood hazards has been directed by envisaging amalgamation of Flood Depth and Flood Affected Frequency. Then the final flood hazard map amalgamated with population and housing data has been used to ascertain the flood disclosure for these two components. Flood hazard analysis in the study area revealed that 24% of the population has been located in high flood hazard zones, where 39% of human settlements are located in different flood hazard zones.
Introduction
A large portion of Paschim Medinipur district in the state of West Bengal in eastern India is vulnerable to flooding. The area of the district is 9295 km2, out of which 1952 km2 is flood prone. The district has four major rivers: Kangsabati, Silabati and Subarnarekha, which have their origin from Chotanagpur and Ranchi plateaus; and Kaliaghai River, which originates in the said district and is also very much flood prone in rainy season. All these rivers are commanding huge catchment areas in and outside the district and bring enormous volumes of water during the rainy season. The frequent floods occurring in great magnitude have left their indelible marks over this region since its history and their ravages tell a grim and sorrowful tale of the suffering of the people. The annual rainfall of the district varies from 1400 mm to 1500 mm, while the annual temperature ranges from 9 °C to 43 °C. The maximum rainfall occurs (75%) during the monsoon periods, from May to September. Heavy rainfall in Chotonagpur plateau results in large inflow into the reservoirs of Chandil, Galudi and Durgapur and heavy rain in Bankura and adjacent districts results in large inflow into the reservoir of Kangsabati. All these reservoirs have failed to control the flood discharge into the rivers in the later part of the rainy season to control the heavy flows. The heavy discharge within a short span of time with onrush of water through the rivers causes inundation, submergence and water logging in vast areas. Very often river banks collapse with high floods and create havoc to the life and property of the people in low lying regions of the district. The high flood events have been determined on the basis of the river gauge site and which flood year crossed the danger level that is addressed as a high flood event. The recurrence interval or return period T in years is calculated by using the Weibull's formula: T = N+1/M, where N is the total number of events and M is the magnitude of high flood events (see Table 1).
The damage caused by floods during the period 2008-2016 revealed that maximum damage occurred in the year 2008, 2009, 2013 and 2015. The damage caused by floods in these 4 years brought immense misery to the people of the district. The population most affected by heavy rain and flood water discharge from different dams was in 2015 and it has been estimated to be 35 lakhs (see Figure 1) as per report of the Disaster Management Department, which supersedes all other damages recorded earlier. In 2015, the flood damage occurred over 3200 km2 of area and 90 374 ha of crop area (see Figure 2) were damaged. It has been estimated that 56 214 houses were fully and 211 411 houses were partly damaged by the 2015 flood. It was also estimated that 11 267 villages were affected and 13 persons died besides a large number of cattle population. Thus, the damages occur in several forms. The agricultural lands with standing paddy plants remain completely submerged for several days in low lying areas. Human habitation and crops are washed away by strong currents, causing numerous breaches across the roads and embankments. Communication links get dislocated and damaged. The researcher extensively visited different places of the district to have a picture of the catastrophic flood of 2015. Some people who had experiences to witness several floods in the district liked to opine that such floods had not occurred in the district during the last two decades. So, in the present context it is an important matter to identify the flood hazard zones and precautionary measures should be taken in the high flood hazard zones.
Literature review
Many scholars and geographers have studied flood inundations and tried to determine the flood areas in different parts of the world with different approaches. In the beginning of the 19th century, attempts were made to draw inundations maps in different parts of the world. The flood hazard mapping and zoning techniques in the United States owe their origin and development to the pioneering works of several researchers including Ellis (1969), Wolman (1971) and Dingman (1975). Islam, Bala and Haque (2010) prepared a flood inundation map for Bangladesh by using moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) images of different times for their study. They also compared RADARSAT images with satellite-based remote sensing data set in their study and found a very strong correlation to derive an inundation map with a determinant coefficient of R2 = 0.96. Huang, Chen and Wu (2014) studied on dynamics of flood inundation in Murray-Darling river basin in Australia. For this study, they used time series flood data and MOIDS imagery. They used peak flood data for choosing exact MOIDS imagery to identify the submerged area of flood. Using hydrological and remotely sensed inundation data, they produced a spatiotemporal inundation map, which will be very helpful to study the eco-hydrological characteristics of the Murray-Darling river basin. Another study on flood hazard assessment was conducted by Islam and Sado (2000). In their study, the authors used National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration advanced very high radiometric resolution (NOAA AVHRR) data with geographic information system(GIS). Different time series flood images have been used to produce flood hazard maps. One flood frequency map and a flood water depth map have been prepared as final output of flood hazard maps. Bates et al. (2006) studied the dynamics of floodplain inundation. For their study, they used airborne synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery. Kopili River Basin of Brahmaputra River situated in the north eastern part of India is one of the most vulnerable flood-affected river basins in India. In the last two decades, 183 flood events have been identified there. In 1977, 1988 and 1998-2015, a total of 3.89 lakh hectares land area was inundated during the time of flood. For flood hazard zonation, Sharma et al. (2016) selected a village as a unit and classified low, medium and high flood hazard zones on the basis of how many villages have been affected in a particular flood. From the study, it has been revealed that 742 villages belong to low hazard zones, 396 villages belong to medium flood hazard zones and 150 villages fall into the high zones of flood hazards.
Objectives
India is one of the most flood-prone countries in the world. The need for flood inundation mapping as well as flood plain zoning is most essential for disaster preparedness and mitigation of floods. It is, however, to be noted that the pace of research in this area of vital human concern is rather scarce in the country. Paschim Medinipur district is also affected by flood in every year, yet no attempt has so far been made to study or map the flood intensifying zones of the district. Therefore, the prime objective of this study was to delineate a flood hazard map of the district, which would be very helpful for the local people to understand the hazards comprehensively.
Methodology
The adopted methodology of this study is shown in Figure 3, which shows the flowchart for the development of a flood hazard map. The various steps are involved in the following manner. Firstly, the flood inundation map from 2007 to 2016 has been collected from the National Remote Sensing Centre, Bhuvan, a geo-platform of the Indian Space Research Organisation. River Peak Water Level (PWL) data have been collected from the Irrigation and Waterways Department of West Bengal. Secondly, for demarcation of the river basin area, Digital Elevation Model (DEM) was derived from Bhuvan. Thirdly, to determine the flood-affected frequency map, flood inundation maps from 2007 to 2016 have been used (see the 'Flood frequency analysis' section) and to determine the flood water depth map, DEM and PWL of the major rivers have been used (see the 'Flood water depth analysis'section). Finally, the flood hazard map has been developed by considering both the flood-affected frequency map and flood water depth map (see the 'Flood hazard map preparation' section).
Description of the study area
Paschim Medinipur district, located in the southern part of West Bengal, has been curved from the erstwhile Medinipur district, the then largest district of India, and came into existence in the present from 01 January 2002. It is situated between 22°57'10" north and 21°36'35" north latitude and 88°12'40" east and 86°35'55" east longitude (see Figure 4). It is bounded by Bankura district at the northern side and Purba Medinipur district at the south-eastern side. The southern boundary of the district is merged with Balasore and Mayurbhanj districts of Odisha and the western boundary is merged with Singhbhum district of Jharkhand. The geographical area of the district is 9295km2. The district is divided into 4 subdivisions, 29 blocks and 8 municipalities. The major rivers of the district, namely, Kangsabati, Silabati and Subarnarekha, originate from the Chotanagpur plateau on the north-west side of the district. The river Kaliaghai, another important river of the district, originates in the district itself. All the rivers flow towards south-east direction according to the variation of the topographical characteristics. The topographical slope of the district is from north-west to south-east. In the extreme south-east of the district, altitude varies from 3 m to 5 m (see Figure 4d).
Discussion and analysis
Flood frequency analysis
Different hydrological variables, such as flood frequency, depth of flooding, rate of water level rises, water velocity, topographical exposure and sediment load, influence flood hazards of a particular area. Two hydraulic components, that is, flood frequency and flood water depth, have been taken into consideration for the assessment and confirmation of the vulnerability of the district to flood hazards.
The notion of the frequency of flood has been adopted from Islam and Sado (2000). The water and non-water areas have been classified from 9 year images and superimposed for generating a map that can record the frequency of flood (see Table 2). Firstly, the classified image of 2007, 2008 and 2009 has been associated to formulate an individual flood frequency map. The method is followed throughout the year. By this method, a three-flood compass map has been prepared. And this three-flood frequency map is assembled to formulate a flood-affected frequency map (see Figure 5).
When the inundated area is found in all three images, then it is identified as the worst affected area and hence it is the most vulnerable zone. The inundated identical area when found in two out of three images is identified as the medium to low affected area. If in any of the images inundated areas are not found, then this is classified as a non-flooded area (Figure 6). The final map of flood-affected frequency has been reclassified again into four types as per the intensity of inundation, assembling to flood rankings order class 1, class 2, class 3 and class 4 as no-flood, low flood, medium flood and high flood hazards areas, respectively.
The flood-affected frequency map revealed that around 12% of the study area in the worst affected area is prone to regular inundation. Around 80% of the study area falls under non-flood category and around 8% of the area has been subjected to medium to low flood categories.
Flood water depth analysis
For developing the series of flood water depth maps, DEM and data of the main rivers have been used. The flood depth maps have been reclassified into four categories: no water, shallow water, medium water and deep water. The model builder utility of Arc GIS has been used to bring out the flood water depth map for the study area. If in the same image deep flood and a medium flood are noticed at least once in the other images, then it has been identified as deep water; if in two images it is found medium, then it has been considered medium water; if in two images it is found shallow, then it has been considered shallow water. The remaining areas are considered as non-flooded areas (Figure 7).
Flood depth maps revealed that around 1025 km2 area occupied deep flood depth categories and medium, shallow and non-flood area occupied 2.26%, 1.21%, 85%, respectively (see Table 4). Here, the depth maps developed only the basis of topographical conditions during the formation of the elevation model of the study area and field visit (see Table 3).
Flood hazard map preparation
Geospatial techniques, particularly Remote Sensing (RS), are the most reliable techniques for the assessment of flood hazard (McKean, Buechel & Gaydo 1991). The final hazard map has been derived from combining the flood-affected frequency maps and flood depth maps. If a cell marks non-flooded in both maps, then it has been regarded as a non-hazard zone. If a cell represents low flooded areas in flood-affected frequency map and shallow flood water depth in flood water depth maps, then it is regarded as a low hazard zone. If a cell represents medium flooded areas in flood-affected frequency map and medium flood water depth in flood water depth maps, then it is regarded as a medium hazard zone. And then if a cell represents deep flood water in flood water depth maps and high flood areas in flood-affected frequency map, then it is regarded as a high hazard zone.
On the basis of hazard intensity, again the flood hazard map has been reclassified into four types: class 1, class 2, class 3 and class 4 as no hazard, low hazard, medium hazard and high hazard zone, respectively (see Figures 8,9,10). The final flood hazard map was incorporated with population and housing data of 2011 census to assess the vulnerability of these two components to flood hazard. Table 5 presents the distribution of population and Table 6 reveals the distribution of housing units in different flood hazard zones. In Silabati river catchment, high flood hazard area is maximum, approximately 313.60 km2, and in Subarnarekha river catchment it is minimum at approximately 118.50 km2 (see Table 7).
Conclusion
The vulnerability analysis exposed that 24% of the total population in the study area has been exposed to high flood hazard zone and 6.35%, 22.13%, 47.52% of population has been exposed to medium, low and no hazards zones, respectively. Similarly, 21% female population and 23% child population have been exposed to high flood hazard zones. Around 35.74% female population and 32.28% child population have been exposed to low to medium hazard zones. Almost 43.53% female population and 44.72% child population have been exposed to no hazard zones. In addition to the housing types, almost 16.51% katcha, 15.54% semi-pucca and 10.19% pucca houses have been exposed to high hazard zones. Around 34.78% katcha, 26.84% semi-pucca and 25.52% pucca houses are exposed to medium to low hazard zones. The analysis of the study clearly indicates that floods remain a significant threat to the people in Paschim Medinipur. As observed in Paschim Medinipur district, people set up their settlements on the floodplains and many brick-kiln industries are also set up on the floodplains which destroy the stiffness of the river embankment. Therefore, the flood hazards increased rapidly. That is why to ameliorate the flood-induced damage, the derived flood hazard map is worthless. Despite the above work, a study should be undertaken to assess the vulnerability and risk of flooding on physical and demographical variables. Therefore, research on flood effects may provide a deeper understanding of flooding in the study area or elsewhere.
In developing countries, where exact information is seriously lacking, such hazard maps are extremely useful for saving the lives and property of millions of people, particularly marginal groups.
Acknowledgements
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.
Authors' contributions
K.D. wrote the first draft of the manuscript and G.K.P. made conceptual contributions. G.K.P. and K.D. conceived and designed the experiments and analysed the data. Both the authors agree with the manuscript results and conclusions. All the authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
References
Bates, P.D., Wilson, M.D., Horritt, M.S., Mason, D.C., Holden, N. & Currie, A., 2006, 'Reach scale floodplain inundation dynamics observed using airborne synthetic aperture radar imagery: Data analysis and modelling', Journal of Hydrology 328, 306-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.12.028 [ Links ]
Dingman, S.L., 1975, 'An expedient approach to community wide flood plain delineation and regulation', Paper Presented at Annual Meeting, AGU, Washington, DC, 17th June.
Ellis, D.W., 1969, 'Flood plain mapping by the U. Sr Geological Survey', in M.D. Dougal (ed.), Floodplain management: Lowa's experience, pp. 197-206, Lowa State University Press, Ames, LA.
Huang, C., Chen, Y. & Wu, J., 2014, 'Mapping spatio-temporal flood inundation dynamics at large river basin scale using time-series flow data and MODIS imagery', International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 26, 350-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2013.09.002 [ Links ]
Islam, A.S., Bala, S.K. & Haque, M.A., 2010, 'Flood inundation map of Bangladesh using MODIS time-series images', Journal of Flood Risk Management 3, 210-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-318X.2010.01074.x [ Links ]
Islam, M.M. & Sado, K., 2000, 'Flood hazard assessment in Bangladesh using NOAA AVHRR data with geographical information system', Hydrological Processes 14(3), 605-620. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(20000228)14:3<605::AID-HYP957>3.0.CO;2-L [ Links ]
McKean, J., Buechel, S. & Gaydo, L., 1991, 'Remote sensing and landslide hazard assessment', Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 57(9), 1185-1193. [ Links ]
Sharma, S.V., Chakravarthi, V., Srinivasarao, G. & Bhanumurthy, V., 2016, 'Extraction of detailed level flood hazard zones using multi-temporal historical satellite data-sets - A case study of Kopili River Basin, Assam, India', Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk 20, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2016.1265014 [ Links ]
Wolman, M.G., 1971, 'Evaluating alternative techniques of flood-plain mapping', Water Resources Research 7(6), 1383-1392. [ Links ]
Correspondence:
Kishor Dandapat
kishordandapat@gmail.com
Received: 01 July 2017
Accepted: 20 Oct. 2017
Published: 26 Mar. 2018