SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.79 issue2 author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

    Related links

    • On index processCited by Google
    • On index processSimilars in Google

    Share


    Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research

    On-line version ISSN 2219-0635Print version ISSN 0030-2465

    Onderstepoort j. vet. res. vol.79 n.2 Pretoria Jan. 2012

     

    ABSTRACT

     

    Human cystic echinococcosis in South Africa

     

     

    Benjamin MogoyeI; Colin N. MenezesII; Martin P. GrobuschII, III, IV; Kerstin WahlersV; John FreanI

    INational Institute for Communicable Diseases, National Health Laboratory Service, South Africa
    IIDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital and University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa
    IIIInstitute of Tropical Medicine, University of Tubingen, Germany
    IVDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    VComprehensive Infectious Diseases Center, University Hospitals, Germany

    Correspondence to

     

     

    Cystic echinococcosis (CE) is caused by the tapeworm, Echinococcus granulosus. The tapeworms resides in the small intestines of canids and the lifecycle involves both intermediate and definitive hosts. Humans are accidental intermediate hosts. Cystic echinococcosis is an economically important infection constituting a threat to public health, and is considered an emerging disease around the world. There are at least 10 Echinococcus strain types (G1 - G10), each exhibiting diversity of morphology, development and host range. The epidemiology of CE is poorly understood in South Africa. A retrospective data analysis of the National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS) laboratory information system on echinococcosis serology, microscopy and histopathology results in eight provinces (excluding KwaZula-Natal) showed an overall positivity rate in submitted diagnostic samples of 17.0% (1056/6211), with the Eastern Cape (30.4%), North West (19.0%) and Northern Cape (18.0%) provinces showing highest rates. The data showed considerable variability between provinces. The review also showed that most proven cases were negative on serology, implying that the actual number of patients could be underestimated. To our knowledge, no data exist about the prevalent strains of E. granulosus and this prospective study will attempt to fill that gap. The aim is to genotype strains causing the disease in South Africa. Two different polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods will be used to respectively target the 12S rRNA and nad 1 genes. To date, three samples have been genotyped as G1, G5 and G6; suggesting diversity of strains prevalent in the country, but more data is needed for a clearer picture.

     

     

    Correspondence to:
    Martin Grobusch
    Department of Internal Medicine
    Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital and the University of the Witwatersrand
    Faculty of Health Sciences, 7
    York Road, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa
    Email: musoket@arc.agric.za

     

     

    Note: Proceedings of the Conference of the Southern African Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance 'One Health' held at the National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, July 2011.