Services on Demand
Article
Indicators
Related links
- Cited by Google
- Similars in Google
Share
South African Journal of Surgery
On-line version ISSN 2078-5151
Print version ISSN 0038-2361
S. Afr. j. surg. vol.48 n.1 Cape Town Feb. 2010
TRAUMA
Pancreaticoduodenal injuries: Re-evaluating current management approaches
G. E. ChinneryI; T. E. MadibaII
IM.B. CH.B, F.C.S. (S.A.); Department of Surgery, King Edward VIII Hospital, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban
IIM.B. CH.B., M.MED., PH.D., F.C.S. (S.A.), F.A.S.C.R.S.; Department of Surgery, King Edward VIII Hospital, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pancreaticoduodenal injuries are uncommon owing to the protected position of the pancreas and duodenum in the retroperitoneum. Management depends on the extent of injury. This study was undertaken to document outcome of pancreaticoduodenal injuries and to re-evaluate our approach.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study of all patients treated for pancreaticoduodenal trauma in one surgical ward at King Edward VIII hospital over a 7-year period (1998 -2004). Demographic data, clinical presentation, findings at laparotomy and outcome were documented. Prophylactic antibiotics were given at induction of anaesthesia.
RESULTS: A total of 488 patients underwent laparotomy over this period, 43 (9%) of whom (all males) had pancreatic and duodenal injuries. Injury mechanisms were gunshot (30), stabbing (10) and blunt trauma (3). Their mean age was 30.1+9.6 years. Delay before laparotomy was 12.8+29.1 hours. Seven were admitted in shock. Mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 14+8.6. Management of 20 duodenal injuries was primary repair (14), repair and pyloric exclusion (3) and conservative (3). Management of 15 pancreatic injuries was drainage alone (13), conservative management of pseudocyst (1) and distal pancreatectomy (1). Management of 8 combined pancreati-coduodenal injuries was primary duodenal repair and pancreatic drainage (5) and repair with pyloric exclusion of duodenal injury and pancreatic drainage (3). Twenty-one patients (49%) developed complications, and 28 required ICU admission with a median ICU stay of 4 days. Ten patients died (23%). Mean hospital stay was 18.3+24.4 days.
CONCLUSIONS: The overall mortality was comparable with that in the world literature. We still recommend adequate exploration of the pancreas and duodenum and conservative operative management where possible.
“Full text available only in PDF format”
REFERENCES
1. Glancy KE. Review of pancreatic trauma. West J Med 1989; 151: 45-51. [ Links ]
2. Jurkovich GJCCJ. Pancreatic trauma. Surg Clin North Am 1990; 70: 575593. [ Links ]
3. Recinos G, DuBose JJ, Teixeira PGR, et al. Local complications following pancreatic trauma. Injury 2008 doi:10.1016/j.injury2008.06.026. [ Links ]
4. Bradley EL,Young PR, Chang MC, et al. Diagnosis and initial management of blunt pancreatic trauma. Guidelines from a multi-institutional review. Ann Surg 1998; 227: 861-869. [ Links ]
5. Stawicki SP, Schwab CW. Pancreatic trauma: demographic, diagnosis, and management. Am Surg 2008; 74: 1133-1145. [ Links ]
6. Madiba TE, Mokoena TR. Favourable prognosis after surgical drainage of gunshot, stab or blunt trauma of the pancreas. Br J Surg 1995; 82: 12361239. [ Links ]
7. Rickard MJ, Brohi K, Bautrz PC. Pancreatic and duodenal injuries: keep it simple. Aust NZ J Surg 2005; 75: 581-586. [ Links ]
8. Shorr RM, Greaney GC, Donovan AJ. Injuries of the duodenum. Am J Surg 1987; 154: 93-99. [ Links ]
9. Vasquez JC, Coimbra R, Hoyt DB, et al. Management of penetrating pancreatic trauma: an 11-year experience of a level-1 trauma centre. Injury 2001; 32: 753-759. [ Links ]
10. Moore EE, Cogbill TH, Malangoni MA, et al. Organ Injury Scaling II: Pancreas, duodenum, small bowel, colon and rectum. J Trauma 1990; 30: 14271429. [ Links ]
11. Baker SP, O'Neill B, Hadden W, et al. The Injury Severity Score. A method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma 1974; 14: 187-196. [ Links ]
12. Nilsson E, Norrby S, Skullman S, et al. Pancreatic trauma in a defined population. Acta Chir Scand 1986; 152: 647-651. [ Links ]
13. Wilson RH, Moorehead RJ. Current management of trauma to the pancreas. Br J Surg 1991; 78: 1196-1202. [ Links ]
14. Ballard RB, Badellimo MM, Eynon CA, et al. Blunt duodenal rupture: a 6-year statewide experience. J Trauma 1997; 43: 229-233. [ Links ]
15. Takishima T, Sugimoto K, Hirata M, et al. Serum amylase level on admission in the diagnosis of blunt injury to the pancreas: Its significance and limitations. Ann Surg 1997; 226: 70-76. [ Links ]
16. Olsen WR. The serum amylase in blunt abdominal trauma. J Trauma 1973; 13: 200-204. [ Links ]
17. Cone JB, Eidt JF. Delayed diagnosis of duodenal rupture. Am J Surg 1994; 168: 676-679. [ Links ]
18. Desai KM, Dorward IG, Minkes RK, et al. Blunt duodenal injuries in children. J Trauma 2003; 54: 640-645. [ Links ]
19. Daly KP, Hp CP, Persson DL, et al. Traumatic retroperitoneal injuries: review of multidetector CT findings. Radiographics 2008; 28: 1571-1590. [ Links ]
20. Jeffrey RB, Ferdele MP, Crass RA. Computed tomography of pancreatic trauma. Radiology 1983; 147: 491-494. [ Links ]
21. Lane MJ, Mindulzun RE, Sandhu JS, et al. CT diagnosis of blunt pancreatic trauma: importance of detecting fluid between the pancreas and splenic vein. Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163: 833-835. [ Links ]
22. Sivit CJ, Eichelberger MR, Taylor GA, et al. Blunt pancreatic trauma in children: CT diagnosis. Am J Roentgenol 1992; 158: 1097-1100. [ Links ]
23. Venkatesh SK, Wan JMC. CT of blunt pancreatic trauma - a pictorial essay. Eur J Radiol 2008; 67: 311-320. [ Links ]
24. Akhrass R, Kim K, Brandt C. Computed tomography: an unreliable indicator of pancreatic trauma. Am Surg 1996; 62: 647-651. [ Links ]
25. Patel SV, Spencer JA, El-Hasani S, et al. Pictorial review. Imaging of pancreatic trauma. Br J Radiol 1998; 71: 985-990. [ Links ]
26. Degiannis E, Boffard K. Duodenal injuries. Br J Surg 2000; 87: 14731479. [ Links ]
27. Taxier M, Sivak MV, Cooperman AM, et al. Endoscopic retrograde pancre-atography in the evaluation of trauma to the pancreas. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1980; 150: 65-68. [ Links ]
28. Whitwell AE, Gomez GA, Byers P, et al. Blunt pancreatic trauma: prospective evaluation of early endoscopic retrograde pancreatography. South Med J 1989; 82: 586-591. [ Links ]
29. Barkin JS, Ferstenberg RM, Panullo W, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholan-giopancreatography in pancreatic trauma. Gastrointest Endosc 1988; 34: 102105. [ Links ]
30. Hayword SR, Lucas CE, Sugawa C, et al. Emergent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. A highly specific test for acute pancreatic trauma. Arch Surg 1989; 124: 745-746. [ Links ]
31. Brennan PM, Stefaniak T, Palmer KR, et al. Endoscopic transpapillary stenting of pancreatic duct disruption. Dig Surg 2006; 23: 250-254. [ Links ]
32. Huckfeldt R, Agee C, Nichols WK, et al. Nonoperative treatment of traumatic pancreatic duct disruption using an endoscopically placed stent. J Trauma 1996; 41: 143-144. [ Links ]
33. Telford JJ, Farrell JJ, Saltzman JR, et al. Pancreatic stent placement for duct disruption. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 150-152. [ Links ]
34. Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Yelon JA, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in the assessment of pancreatic duct trauma and its sequelae: preliminary findings. J Trauma 2000; 48: 1001-1007. [ Links ]
35. Gupta A, Stuhlfaut JW, Fleming KW, et al. Blunt trauma of the pancreas and biliary tract: a multimodality imaging approach to diagnosis. Radiographics 2004; 24: 1381-1394. [ Links ]
36. Ivatury RR, Nallathambi M, Guadino J, et al. Penetrating duodenal injuries. Analysis of 100 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 1985; 202: 153-158. [ Links ]
37. Kline G, Lucas CE, Ledgerwood AM, et al. Duodenal organ injury severity (OIS) and outcome. Am Surg 1994; 60: 500-504. [ Links ]
38. Nassoura ZE, Ivatury RR, Simon RJ, et al. A prospective reappraisal of primary repair of penetrating duodenal injuries. Am Surg 1994; 60: 35-39. [ Links ]
39. Talving P, Nicol AJ, Navsaria PH. Civilian duodenal gunshot wounds: surgical management made simpler. World J Surg 2006; 30: 488-494. [ Links ]
40. Timaran CH, Martinez O, Ospina JA. Prognostic factors and management of civilian penetrating duodenal trauma. J Trauma 1999; 47: 330-335. [ Links ]
41. Blocksom JM, Tyburski JG, Sohn RL, et al. Prognostic determinants in duodenal injuries. Am Surg 2004; 70: 248-255. [ Links ]
42. Bozkurt B, Ozdemir BA, Kocer B, et al. Operative approach in traumatic injuries of the duodenum. Acta Chir Belg 2006; 106: 405-408. [ Links ]
43. Seamon MJ, Pieri PG, Fisher CA, et al. A ten-year retrospective review: does pyloric exclusion improve outcome after penetrating duodenal and combined pancreaticoduodenal injuries? J Trauma 2007; 62: 829-833. [ Links ]
44. Velmahos GC, Constatninou C, Kasotakis G. Safety of repair foe severe duodenal injuries. World J Surg 2008; 32: 7-12. [ Links ]
45. Chinnery GE, Thomson SR, Ghimenton F, et al. Pancreatico-enterostomy for isolated main pancreatic duct disruption. Injury 2008; 39: 50-56. [ Links ]
46. Degiannis E, Levy RD, Potokar T, et al. Distal pancreatectomy for gunshot injuries of the distal pancreas. Br J Surg 1995; 82: 1240-1242. [ Links ]
47. Cogbill TH, Moore EE, Morris JA, et al. Distal pancreatectomy for trauma: a multicentre experience. J Trauma 1991; 31: 1600-1606. [ Links ]
48. Thomson SR, Ghimenton F. Pancreatico-gastrostomy for trauma: an alternative to distal pancreatectomy. Injury 2000; 31: 394-395. [ Links ]
49. Subramanian A, Dente CJ, Feliciano DV. The management of pancreatic trauma in the modern era. Surg Clin N Am 2007; 87: 1515-1532. [ Links ]
50. Whalen GF, Robbs JV, Baker LW. Injuries of the pancreas and duodenum - results of a conservative approach. S Afr J Surg 1987; 25: 15-18. [ Links ]
51. Degiannis E, Glapa M, Loukogeorgakis SP, et al. Management of pancreatic trauma. Injury 2008; 39: 21-29. [ Links ]
52. Barthat M, Lamblin G, Gasmi M, et al. Clinical usefulness of a treatment algorithm for pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: 245-252. [ Links ]
53. Lin B-C, Fang J-F, Wong Y-C. Blunt pancreatic trauma and pseudocyst: Management of major pancreatic duct injury. Injury 2007; 38: 588-593. [ Links ]
54. Tyburski JG, Dente CJ, Wilson RF, et al. Infectious complications following duodenal and/or pancreatic trauma. Am Surg 2001; 67: 227-230. [ Links ]
55. Akhrass R, Yaffe MB, Brandt CP, et al. Pancreatic trauma: a ten-year multi-institutional experience. Am Surg 1997; 63: 598-604. [ Links ]
56. Mayer JM, Tomczak R, Rau B, et al. Pancreatic injury in severe trauma: early diagnosis and therapy improve the outcome. Dig Surg 2002; 19: 291-299. [ Links ]
57. Asensio JA, Petrone P, Roldan G, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a rare procedure for the management of complex pancreaticoduodenal injuries. J Am Coll Surg 2003; 197: 937-942. [ Links ]
58. Delcore R, Stauffer JS, Thomas JH, et al. The role of pancreaticogastros-tomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy for trauma. J Trauma 1994; 37: 395-400. [ Links ]
59. Krige JEJ, Beningfield SJ, Nicol AJ, et al. The management of complex pancreatic injuries. S Afr J Surg 2005; 43: 92-102. [ Links ]
60. Gupta V, Wig JD, Carg H. Trauma pancreaticoduodenectomy for complex pancreaticoduodenal injury: Delayed reconstruction. J Pancreas (JOP) 2008; 9: 618-623. [ Links ]
61. Huerta S, Bui T, Porral D, et al. Predictors of morbidity and mortality in patients with traumatic duodenal injuries. Am Surg 2005; 71: 763-767. [ Links ]