SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.57 issue1Direct Red: A Surgeon's View of her Life or Death Profession author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

    Related links

    • On index processCited by Google
    • On index processSimilars in Google

    Share


    South African Journal of Surgery

    On-line version ISSN 2078-5151Print version ISSN 0038-2361

    S. Afr. j. surg. vol.57 n.1 Cape Town Mar. 2019

     

    PLASTIC SURGERY

     

    Lymph node transplant in Kenya: a case series of 20 patients

     

     

    AO WamalwaI; FW NangoleII; SO KhaingaIII

    IPlastic Surgery Registrar, School of Medicine, University of Nairobi
    IIConsultant Plastic Surgeon & Lecturer; Department of Surgery (Plastic), University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
    IIIConsultant Plastic Surgeon & Associate Professor; Department of Surgery (Plastic), University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya

    Correspondence

     

     


    SUMMARY

    Chronic limb lymphedema is a debilitating condition whose definitive management eludes medical practice to date. Lymph node transplant results in improvement of symptomatology amongst patients with lymphedema non-responsive to non-operative management. A retrospective audit of all patients who underwent lymph node transplant in Nairobi, Kenya for the period June 2014-June 2017 (three years) was done. We report improvement of symptomatology amongst patients with stage II lymphedema non-responsive to non-operative management. We also highlight surgical considerations taken during the management of these cases.


     

     

    Erratum

    RE: ERRATUM FOR "The first series of laparoscopic radical cystectomies done in South Africa" S Afr J Surg 2018;56(4).

    In the article "The first series of laparoscopic radical cystectomies done in South Africa" Cassim F, Sinha S, Jaumdally S, Lazarus J. S Afr J Surg 2018;56(4), an error was picked up after the final version of the manuscript was approved by the Editorial Office and after the journal went to print. The figure below is the correct version that should have accompanied the paper in place of the original Figure 2. The only difference reflected in the new figure below is a marked decrease in Clavian 5 of the classification scale where the level went from 10% and 23% respectively for the laparoscopic and open groups to 6% each. The changes occurred with selection of the right time-frame for the Clavian classification, which should be limited to 30 days post-procedure, while the original Figure was reflecting data for follow-up well past this 30-day window.

    Sunil Sinha

    (For authors listed in the manuscript)

     

     

    Correspondence:
    Dr Alex Wamalwa
    aleoke@gmail.com