Services on Demand
Article
Indicators
Related links
- Cited by Google
- Similars in Google
Share
South African Journal of Science
On-line version ISSN 1996-7489
Print version ISSN 0038-2353
Abstract
DE JAGER, Kylie; CHIMHUNDU, Chipo; SAIDI, Trust and DOUGLAS, Tania S.. The medical device development landscape in South Africa: Institutions, sectors and collaboration. S. Afr. j. sci. [online]. 2017, vol.113, n.5-6, pp.1-8. ISSN 1996-7489. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2017/20160259.
A characterisation of the medical device development landscape in South Africa would be beneficial for future policy developments that encourage locally developed devices to address local healthcare needs. The landscape was explored through a bibliometric analysis (2000-2013) of relevant scientific papers using co-authorship as an indicator of collaboration. Collaborating institutions thus found were divided into four sectors: academia (A); healthcare (H); industry (I); and science and support (S). A collaboration network was drawn to show the links between the institutions and analysed using network analysis metrics. Centrality measures identified seven dominant local institutions from three sectors. Group densities were used to quantify the extent of collaboration: the A sector collaborated the most extensively both within and between sectors; local collaborations were more prevalent than international collaborations. Translational collaborations (AHI, HIS or AHIS) are considered to be pivotal in fostering medical device innovation that is both relevant and likely to be commercialised. Few such collaborations were found, suggesting room for increased collaboration of these types in South Africa. SIGNIFICANCE: • Results could inform the development of strategies and policies to promote certain types of medical device development. • Further studies could identify drivers and barriers to successful medical device development in South Africa.
Keywords : bibliometrics; co-authorship; social network analysis; translational collaboration; foreign influence.