SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.113 issue5-6Competence of Science Foundation students in some simple strategies for problem solvingMicrowave plasma-enhanced chemical vapour deposition growth of carbon nanostructures author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

South African Journal of Science

On-line version ISSN 1996-7489
Print version ISSN 0038-2353

Abstract

DE JAGER, Kylie; CHIMHUNDU, Chipo; SAIDI, Trust  and  DOUGLAS, Tania S.. The medical device development landscape in South Africa: Institutions, sectors and collaboration. S. Afr. j. sci. [online]. 2017, vol.113, n.5-6, pp.1-8. ISSN 1996-7489.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2017/20160259.

A characterisation of the medical device development landscape in South Africa would be beneficial for future policy developments that encourage locally developed devices to address local healthcare needs. The landscape was explored through a bibliometric analysis (2000-2013) of relevant scientific papers using co-authorship as an indicator of collaboration. Collaborating institutions thus found were divided into four sectors: academia (A); healthcare (H); industry (I); and science and support (S). A collaboration network was drawn to show the links between the institutions and analysed using network analysis metrics. Centrality measures identified seven dominant local institutions from three sectors. Group densities were used to quantify the extent of collaboration: the A sector collaborated the most extensively both within and between sectors; local collaborations were more prevalent than international collaborations. Translational collaborations (AHI, HIS or AHIS) are considered to be pivotal in fostering medical device innovation that is both relevant and likely to be commercialised. Few such collaborations were found, suggesting room for increased collaboration of these types in South Africa. SIGNIFICANCE: • Results could inform the development of strategies and policies to promote certain types of medical device development. • Further studies could identify drivers and barriers to successful medical device development in South Africa.

Keywords : bibliometrics; co-authorship; social network analysis; translational collaboration; foreign influence.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )