SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.45 issue3Mental illness, harassment and labour laws: some thoughts on harassment by employees suffering from mental illnessThe international labour organisation in pursuit of decent work in Southern Africa: an appraisal author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

    Related links

    • On index processCited by Google
    • On index processSimilars in Google

    Share


    Obiter

    On-line version ISSN 2709-555XPrint version ISSN 1682-5853

    Abstract

    PHUNGULA, Simphiwe P. The effect of business rescue's moratorium on property belonging to the company or in its lawful possession and third-party contracts. Obiter [online]. 2024, vol.45, n.3, pp.635-648. ISSN 2709-555X.

    The rights of both company and property owner have been a burning issue when a company embarks on business rescue proceedings. This issue has been plagued by difficulties with the interpretation of "moratorium" as found in section 133(1) of the Companies Act 71 of 2008. Property owners who have concluded contracts of lease or instalment sale with a company constantly find themselves in difficult positions when the company commences business rescue proceedings. These difficulties include, inter alia, the business rescue practitioner's cancelling of agreements between the property owner and the company, and the associated procedure; the failure of the company to pay in accordance with the agreements and the property owners' recourse/cause of action; and the effect of a moratorium on those properties. This article therefore deals with the competing legal and commercial interests, including rights, of both company and property owners when a company has commenced business rescue proceedings.

            · text in English     · English ( pdf )