SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.13 issue5The Dutch Crisis and Recovery Act: economic recovery and legal crisis?How to use voluntary, self-regulatory and alternative environmental compliance tools: some lessons learnt author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand



Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google


Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal (PELJ)

On-line version ISSN 1727-3781


KIDD, M. Public interest environmental litigation: recent cases raise possible obstacles. PER [online]. 2010, vol.13, n.5, pp.27-47. ISSN 1727-3781.

Despite the broadening of locus standi in environmental cases by both Section 38 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, and Section 32 of the National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998, two recent cases suggest that the preconstitutional approach to locus standi still holds sway in our Courts. Moreover, failure to recognise the environmental right in Section 24 of the Constitution may be an impediment to applicants' ability to bring an interdict application successfully. Correct use of the relevant constitutional provisions ought to obviate such problems, but alternatives are suggested. In the course of the article, it is suggested that the rule in Patz v Greene is no longer relevant and should be consigned to the history books.

Keywords : Environment; environmental protection; public interest environmental litigation; locus standi; interdict; Patz v Greene; environmental right; remedies; Constitution; common law.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )


Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License