SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.7 número2 índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados



Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google


SA Orthopaedic Journal

versión On-line ISSN 2309-8309
versión impresa ISSN 1681-150X

SA orthop. j. vol.7 no.2 Centurion abr./jun. 2008




Lumbar spinal stenosis



JA Shipley

MMed(Orth); Department Orthopaedic Surgery, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein





Lumbar spinal stenosis is diagnosed by the clinical picture of radiculopathy and / or spinal claudication caused by narrowing of the spinal canal. Anatomical and radiological features correlate poorly with the clinical features, and are of little prognostic value. The natural history is very benign with fluctuating levels and types of symptoms. Indications for surgery must be individualized, but decompression is effective in the short and medium term. Fusion is only indicated in the case of instability.



“Full text available only in PDF format”




1. Verbiest H. A radicular syndrome from developmental narrowing of the lumbar vertebral canal. JBJS 1954;36B:230-7.         [ Links ]

2. Arnoldi CC et al. Lumbar spinal stenosis and nerve root entrapment syndromes. Definition and classification. CORR 1976;115:4-5.         [ Links ]

3. Lee CK et al. Lateral lumbar spinal canal stenosis; classification, pathological anatomy and surgical decompression. Spine 1988;13(3):313-20.         [ Links ]

4. Johnsson KE et al. The natural course of lumbar spinal stenosis. CORR 1992;279:82-6.         [ Links ]

5. Amundsen T et al. Lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical and radiological features. Spine 2000;25;1424-35.         [ Links ]

6. Sengupta DK, Herkowitz HN. Lumbar spinal stenosis. Treatment strategies and indications for surgery. OCNA 2003;34:281-95.         [ Links ]

7. Haig et al. Predictors of pain and function in persons with spinal stenosis, low back pain and no back pain. Spine 2006;31(25):2950-7.         [ Links ]

8. Lohman MC et al. Comparison of radiological signs and clinical symptoms of spinal stenosis. Spine 2006; 31(16):1834-40.         [ Links ]

9. Amundsen T et al. Lumbar spinal stenosis; conservative or surgical management? A prospective 10 year study. Spine 2000;25:1424-35.         [ Links ]

10. Katz JN et al. 7-10 year outcome of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 1996;21:92-8.         [ Links ]

11. Grob D et al. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Decompression with and without arthrodesis. JBJS 1995;77A:1036-41.         [ Links ]

12. Malmivaara A et al. Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? Spine 2007;32(1):1-8.         [ Links ]

13. Postacchini F et al. Bone regrowth after surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. JBJS 1992;74B(6):862-9.         [ Links ]

14. Herkowitz HN et al. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse arthrodesis. JBJS 1991;73A:802-8.         [ Links ]

15. Fischgrund JS et al. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation. Spine 1997;22(24):2807-12.         [ Links ]

16. Kornblum, Fischgrund & Herkowitz. AAOS 2000.         [ Links ]

17. Bassewitz & Herkowitz. Lumbar stenosis with spondylolisthesis. CORR 2001;384:54-60.         [ Links ]



Prof JA Shipley MMed(Orth)
Department Orthopaedic Surgery
University of the Free State, Bloemfontein
Tel: (051) 405-2242; Fax: (051) 430-7101

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons