SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.42 issue1Exploring the tensions of sustaining economic empowerment of persons with disabilities through open labour market employment in the Cape MetropoleOccupational therapy and the quest for human dignity: Why human rights matter author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand



Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • On index processSimilars in Google


South African Journal of Occupational Therapy

On-line version ISSN 2310-3833
Print version ISSN 0038-2337

S. Afr. j. occup. ther. vol.42 n.1 Pretoria  2012




The achievement of community integration and productive activity outcomes by CVA survivors in the Western Cape Metro Health District



Soelaylah Am HassanI; Surona VisagieII; Gubela MjiIII

IDiploma in Social work, BA Hons Social work, MPhil (Rehabilitation). Social worker - Western Cape Rehabilitation Centre
IIB.Sc Physiotherapy, M.Sc (Rehabilitation). Extra-ordinary senior lecturer, Centre for Rehabilitation studies, University of Stellenbosch
IIIMSc Physiotherapy (UCT). Director; Centre for rehabilitation studies, University of Stellenbosch





INTRODUCTION: According to the South African National Rehabilitation policy, achieving advanced outcomes such as community integration and productive activity, should be the focus of the rehabilitation services. However, according to the literature, rehabilitation does not often progress beyond basic outcomes such as mobility and self-care. The aim of this study was to describe the achievement of community integration and productive activity outcomes by a group of CVA survivors in the Western Cape Metro Health District.
METHODS: A descriptive study was carried out. Quantitative data were collected from 57 CVA survivors and caregivers. All these CVA survivors had received in-patient rehabilitation at the Western Cape Rehabilitation Centre (WCRC). Data were collected by means of a medical and demographic questionnaire, the Barthel Index and the Outcome Levels according to Landrum et al.
RESULTS: On discharge from in-patient rehabilitation seven (12%) stroke survivors were at level II ie they had achieved only the basic rehabilitation outcomes necessary to preserve long term physiological health, whereas 37 (65%) stroke survivors were discharged at an outcome level III ie ready for residential integration, and 12 (21%) were at level IV ie community integration, and one (2%) at level V (productive activity). Assessment at the time of the study showed a general improvement post discharge, with 21 participants (37%) improving by one or two outcome to achieve community integration and five (9%) achieving the outcome level of productive activity through informal income generating activities.
CONCLUSION: Thirty three (58%) stroke survivors achieved community integration, while six (10%) progressed to employment. One would like to see further progress to employment especially for those participants who were employed before the stroke. Clinicians might be able to assist more stroke survivors to achieve this through using the outcome levels and incorporating the interventions to reach productive activity such as performing work and skills assessments, employer education and assistance with reasonable accommodations in rehabilitation goals.

Key words: Cerebro vascular accident, outcome levels, productive activity



“Full text available only in PDF format”




1. Helander E. Prejudice and Dignity. An introduction to Community-S based Rehabilitation. New York: United Nations Development Programme, 1993.         [ Links ]

2. Department of Health, Republic of South Africa. National Rehabilitation Policy (NRP). 2000 Pretoria: South Africa: Accessed 2008.02.04 at         [ Links ]

3. Department of Health, Provincial Government of the Western Cape. Comprehensive Service Plan for the Implementation of Healthcare 2010. 2007 Accessed 2008.04. 17 at         [ Links ]

4. Rhoda A, Mpofu R & De Weerdt W. The Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients at Community Health Centers in the Western Cape. SA Journal of Physiotherapy, 2009; 65 (3): 3-8.         [ Links ]

5. Kautzky K & Tollman SM. A Perspective on Primary Health Care in South Africa: 17-30. In South African Health Review. Durban, South Africa: Health Systems Trust, 2001        [ Links ]

6. Kahonde CK, Mlenzana N & Rhoda A. Persons with physical disabilities' experiences of rehabilitation services at community health centers in Cape Town. SA Journal of Physiotherapy, 2010; 66 (3): 2-7.         [ Links ]

7. Gcaza S & Visagie S. An Investigation into Processes, Mechanisms and Resources Required in order to (Re) integrate Recipients of Disability Grants into Employment. Commissioned by the Department of Social Development, 2009.         [ Links ]

8. Landrum PK, Schmidt ND & McLean A. Outcome-oriented Rehabilitation. Principles, Strategies and Tools for Effective Program Management. First edition. Maryland: Aspen Publishers, 1995.         [ Links ]

9. Shakespeare, T. Power and Prejudice; Issues of gender, sexuality and disability. In: Barton, L (ed). Disability and Society: Emerging Issues and Insights. New York: New York Addison Wesley Longman (Ltd), 1996: 191-214.         [ Links ]

10. Sundance, P. Cope, D.N. Kirshblum, S. Parsons, K.C. and Apple, D.F Systematic Care Management: Clinical and Economic Analysis of a National Sample of Patients with Spinal Cord Injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil, 2004;10(2): 17-34.         [ Links ]

11. McLean R. Employment Status Six Months after Discharge from Inpatient Rehabilitation for a Mild-to-moderate Physical Disability. Ann Acad Med Singapore, 2007; 36: 18-21.         [ Links ]

12. Wolfenden B & Grace M. Returning to Work After Stroke: A Review. International Journal Rehabilitation Res, 2009; 32(2) :93-7.         [ Links ]

13. Alavinia SM & Burdorf A. Unemployment and Retirement and Ill-health: A Cross-sectional Analysis across European Countries. International Archive Occupational Environmental Health, 2008; 82(1): 39-45.         [ Links ]

14. Alaszewski A, Alaszewski H, Potter J, Penhale B. Working after a Stroke: Survivors' Experiences and Perceptions of Barriers to and Facilitators of the Return to Paid Employment. Disability Rehabilitation, 2007; 29(24): 1858-69.         [ Links ]

15. Hartman-Maeir A, Soroker N, Ring H, Avni N & Katz N. Activities, Participation and Satisfaction One-Year Post Stroke. Disability Rehabilitation, 2007; 29(7): 559 - 566.         [ Links ]

16. Glozier N, Hackett ML, Parag V & Anderson GS. The Influence of Psychiatric Morbidity on Return to Paid Work After Stroke in Younger Adults. The Auckland Regional Community Stroke (AR-COS) Study, 2002 to 2003. Stroke, 2008; 39:1526 - 1532.         [ Links ]

17. Lindström B, Röding J & Sundelin G. Positive Attitudes and Preserved High Level of Motor Performance are Important Factors for Return to Work in Younger Persons After Stroke: A National Survey. J Rehabilitation Medical, 2009; 41(9): 714-20.         [ Links ]

18. Treger I, Shames J, Giaquinto S & Ring H. Return to work in stroke patients. Disability Rehabilitation, 2007; 29(17): 1397 - 1403.         [ Links ]

19. Hommel M, Trabucco-Miguel S, Naegele B, Gonnet N, Jaillard A. Cognitive determinants of social functioning after a first-ever mild to moderate stroke at vocational age Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 2009; 80(8).         [ Links ]

20. Domholdt E. Rehabilitation research: Principles and applications, 3rd ed. Elsevier Saunders, 2005.         [ Links ]

21. Jaillard A, Naegele B, Trabucco-Miguel S, LeBas JF Marc Hommel M. Hidden Dysfunctioning in Subacute Stroke. Stroke, 2009; 40: 2473-2479.         [ Links ]

22. Uyttenboogaart M, Stewart RE, Vroomen PCAJ, De Keyser J & Luijckx G. Optimizing cutoff scores for the Bartel Index and the Modified Rankin Scale for Defining Outcome in Acute Stroke trials. Stroke, 2005; 36:1984-1987.         [ Links ]

23. Wade D. Measurement in Neurological Rehabilitation. Third edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.         [ Links ]

24. Horgan NF & Finn AM. Motor recovery following stroke: a basic evaluation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 1997; 19(2): 64 - 70.         [ Links ]

25. Hassan S, Visagie S, Mji G. Community support services after stroke. The social work Practitioner, 2011; 23(2): 229-242.         [ Links ]

26. Rhoda AJ & Hendry JA. Profile of stroke patients treated at a community-based rehabilitation Centre in a Cape Town Health District. SA Journal of Physiotherapy, 2003; 59(4): 20-24.         [ Links ]

27. Medin J, Barajas J & Ekberg K. Stroke Patients' Experiences of Return to Work. Disability Rehabilitation, 2006; 28(17): 1051-60.         [ Links ]

28. Van Zyl R and Work Assessment Task Team. Proposal for an Intersectoral Model for the economic inclusion of Persons with Disabilities. Presentation to Dr B Engelbrecht, unpublished paper, 2005.         [ Links ]

29. Gaffney P Local Government in South Africa - Official Yearbook 2007-2008. Johannesburg: The Gaffney Group, 2007.         [ Links ]



Surona Visagie

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License